The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The impact of regional 99mTc-HMPAO single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging on clinician diagnostic confidence in a mixed cognitive impairment sample

The impact of regional 99mTc-HMPAO single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging on clinician diagnostic confidence in a mixed cognitive impairment sample
The impact of regional 99mTc-HMPAO single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging on clinician diagnostic confidence in a mixed cognitive impairment sample
AIM:To assess the clinical impact of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging on diagnosis and clinician diagnostic confidence in a cohort of individuals with cognitive impairment. 
MATERIALS AND METHODS:Forty-one clinicians who referred 79 patients for a [99mTc]-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) SPECT for cognitive complaints completed a two-part questionnaire to determine the diagnosis and diagnostic confidence (using a 0-100 visual analogue scale [VAS]) before and after imaging. SPECT images were analysed using statistical parametric mapping and interpreted semi-quantitatively. Clinicians were also asked directly for their opinion on whether the imaging contributed to their diagnostic process. 
RESULTS:Diagnosis changed after imaging in 44% of cases, and confidence was significantly improved (VAS score change= +26.3±22.2) after imaging in cases where the pre-imaging confidence was low (p<0.001). Clinician confidence was not significantly different (VAS score change=-6.6±25.5) after imaging when pre-imaging confidence was moderate to high. Interestingly, a proportion of clinicians with the highest confidence levels became less certain about their diagnosis following imaging results. When asked directly, 96% of clinicians stated that the imaging contributed to the diagnostic process. 
CONCLUSIONS:In a mixed clinical cognitive impairment cohort, perfusion SPECT is valued by referring clinicians and contributes to diagnostic decision making. Imaging is of particular value when diagnostic confidence is low prior to imaging
0009-9260
714.e7-714.e14
Prosser, A.M.J.
de1efee5-67f5-478e-8cfa-12a8e78a68e5
Tossici-Bolt, L.
5bb6c0b3-3ba7-4ffc-9922-8f9cdb9f5829
Kipps, C.M.
e43be016-2dc2-45e6-9a02-ab2a0e0208d5
Prosser, A.M.J.
de1efee5-67f5-478e-8cfa-12a8e78a68e5
Tossici-Bolt, L.
5bb6c0b3-3ba7-4ffc-9922-8f9cdb9f5829
Kipps, C.M.
e43be016-2dc2-45e6-9a02-ab2a0e0208d5

Prosser, A.M.J., Tossici-Bolt, L. and Kipps, C.M. (2020) The impact of regional 99mTc-HMPAO single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging on clinician diagnostic confidence in a mixed cognitive impairment sample. Clinical Radiology, 75 (9), 714.e7-714.e14. (doi:10.1016/j.crad.2020.04.016).

Record type: Article

Abstract

AIM:To assess the clinical impact of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging on diagnosis and clinician diagnostic confidence in a cohort of individuals with cognitive impairment. 
MATERIALS AND METHODS:Forty-one clinicians who referred 79 patients for a [99mTc]-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) SPECT for cognitive complaints completed a two-part questionnaire to determine the diagnosis and diagnostic confidence (using a 0-100 visual analogue scale [VAS]) before and after imaging. SPECT images were analysed using statistical parametric mapping and interpreted semi-quantitatively. Clinicians were also asked directly for their opinion on whether the imaging contributed to their diagnostic process. 
RESULTS:Diagnosis changed after imaging in 44% of cases, and confidence was significantly improved (VAS score change= +26.3±22.2) after imaging in cases where the pre-imaging confidence was low (p<0.001). Clinician confidence was not significantly different (VAS score change=-6.6±25.5) after imaging when pre-imaging confidence was moderate to high. Interestingly, a proportion of clinicians with the highest confidence levels became less certain about their diagnosis following imaging results. When asked directly, 96% of clinicians stated that the imaging contributed to the diagnostic process. 
CONCLUSIONS:In a mixed clinical cognitive impairment cohort, perfusion SPECT is valued by referring clinicians and contributes to diagnostic decision making. Imaging is of particular value when diagnostic confidence is low prior to imaging

Text
ProsserAMJ_2020_ClinRad_HMPAO-SPECT_impact - Accepted Manuscript
Download (612kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 April 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 June 2020
Published date: September 2020
Additional Information: Funding Information: This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex (NIHR ARC Wessex) . The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 442094
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/442094
ISSN: 0009-9260
PURE UUID: 53f3ef4d-e767-48e1-83b6-fe69ffa31356
ORCID for A.M.J. Prosser: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2705-1222
ORCID for C.M. Kipps: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5205-9712

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jul 2020 16:49
Last modified: 21 Nov 2024 05:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.M.J. Prosser ORCID iD
Author: L. Tossici-Bolt
Author: C.M. Kipps ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×