Identification of uncertainty sources in quasi-global discharge and inundation simulations using satellite-based precipitation products
Identification of uncertainty sources in quasi-global discharge and inundation simulations using satellite-based precipitation products
Predicting river discharge and inundation is crucial for water resources management and flood hazard reduction; however, it is still unclear to what extent their variabilities can be captured on global scale. This study evaluates uncertainty sources in the quasi-global river discharge and inundation simulations using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrologic model and the Catchment-based Macroscale Floodplain (CaMa-Flood) hydrodynamic model, forced with five high-resolution satellite precipitation datasets. The simulated discharge is first evaluated against more than 2852 sites selected from the Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM) dataset, and then the simulated inundation is compared with complementary multiple satellite observations. Globally, about 38% – 43% of the stations produce reasonable discharge simulations with positive Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) on monthly time scale. The simulations show good agreement for flood fractions with mean correlations ranging from 0.47 to 0.62 for satellite detected events. The potential uncertainties sources of discharge and inundation simulation related to physics setting and forcing datasets, such as precipitation, land surface model, routing model, and observation from site and satellite are discussed, as well as future directions for improving large-scale model applications. By using default model settings, we hope our study can offer valuable insights into the applicability of flood simulations and provide guides for model development.
Floodplain hydrodynamic model, Inundation simulations, Land surface model, River discharge, Uncertainty sources
1-15
Wei, Zhongwang
8c8a2714-1913-4deb-a440-827a382cc775
He, Xiaogang
5fd2fdc9-b14e-4010-8490-c02950d0a62a
Zhang, Yonggen
1792a9cb-6d99-46c9-baa5-25db13db3c90
Pan, Ming
5f0a6106-cf97-4213-b345-6b220f3d9bc4
Sheffield, Justin
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Peng, Liqing
5a4984ff-9082-4a4c-8e17-991d9eda35cc
Yamazaki, Dai
795ad2c7-e501-4dc7-adf3-09a75951e56d
Moiz, Abdul
b1bf1840-3fde-40e0-bac1-e35cc7a2f226
Liu, Yaping
b1538d46-c1b5-421b-8d85-57e1da8f84bd
Ikeuchi, Koji
e92a161a-0ccf-4b35-86e7-06d4da9a3b31
1 October 2020
Wei, Zhongwang
8c8a2714-1913-4deb-a440-827a382cc775
He, Xiaogang
5fd2fdc9-b14e-4010-8490-c02950d0a62a
Zhang, Yonggen
1792a9cb-6d99-46c9-baa5-25db13db3c90
Pan, Ming
5f0a6106-cf97-4213-b345-6b220f3d9bc4
Sheffield, Justin
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Peng, Liqing
5a4984ff-9082-4a4c-8e17-991d9eda35cc
Yamazaki, Dai
795ad2c7-e501-4dc7-adf3-09a75951e56d
Moiz, Abdul
b1bf1840-3fde-40e0-bac1-e35cc7a2f226
Liu, Yaping
b1538d46-c1b5-421b-8d85-57e1da8f84bd
Ikeuchi, Koji
e92a161a-0ccf-4b35-86e7-06d4da9a3b31
Wei, Zhongwang, He, Xiaogang, Zhang, Yonggen, Pan, Ming, Sheffield, Justin, Peng, Liqing, Yamazaki, Dai, Moiz, Abdul, Liu, Yaping and Ikeuchi, Koji
(2020)
Identification of uncertainty sources in quasi-global discharge and inundation simulations using satellite-based precipitation products.
Journal of Hydrology, 589, , [125180].
(doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125180).
Abstract
Predicting river discharge and inundation is crucial for water resources management and flood hazard reduction; however, it is still unclear to what extent their variabilities can be captured on global scale. This study evaluates uncertainty sources in the quasi-global river discharge and inundation simulations using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrologic model and the Catchment-based Macroscale Floodplain (CaMa-Flood) hydrodynamic model, forced with five high-resolution satellite precipitation datasets. The simulated discharge is first evaluated against more than 2852 sites selected from the Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM) dataset, and then the simulated inundation is compared with complementary multiple satellite observations. Globally, about 38% – 43% of the stations produce reasonable discharge simulations with positive Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) on monthly time scale. The simulations show good agreement for flood fractions with mean correlations ranging from 0.47 to 0.62 for satellite detected events. The potential uncertainties sources of discharge and inundation simulation related to physics setting and forcing datasets, such as precipitation, land surface model, routing model, and observation from site and satellite are discussed, as well as future directions for improving large-scale model applications. By using default model settings, we hope our study can offer valuable insights into the applicability of flood simulations and provide guides for model development.
Text
Precipitation Cama draft
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 June 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 June 2020
Published date: 1 October 2020
Keywords:
Floodplain hydrodynamic model, Inundation simulations, Land surface model, River discharge, Uncertainty sources
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 443783
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/443783
ISSN: 0022-1694
PURE UUID: 6c89ec7c-422c-4e67-ba21-97e12b9f4d12
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Sep 2020 16:41
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Zhongwang Wei
Author:
Xiaogang He
Author:
Yonggen Zhang
Author:
Ming Pan
Author:
Liqing Peng
Author:
Dai Yamazaki
Author:
Abdul Moiz
Author:
Yaping Liu
Author:
Koji Ikeuchi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics