The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Research review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex/gender differences in social interaction and communication in autistic and non-autistic children and adolescents

Research review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex/gender differences in social interaction and communication in autistic and non-autistic children and adolescents
Research review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex/gender differences in social interaction and communication in autistic and non-autistic children and adolescents

Background: Evidence increasingly suggests that ASD manifests differently in females than males. Previous reviews investigating sex/gender differences in social interaction and social communication have focused at the level of broad constructs (e.g. comparing algorithm scores from pre-existing diagnostic instruments) and have typically reported no significant differences between males and females. However, a number of individual studies have found sex/gender differences in narrow construct domains. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and random effects model meta-analyses (in January 2019 and updated January 2020) that investigated sex/gender differences in narrow construct measures of social communication and interaction in autistic and nonautistic children and adolescents, and adults. Study quality was appraised using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS, BMJ Open, 6, 2016, 1). Results: Across 16 studies (including 2,730 participants), the analysis found that female (vs. male) individuals with ASD had significantly better social interaction and social communication skills (SMD = 0.39, p <.001), which was reflective of a similar sex/gender profile in nonautistic individuals (SMD = 0.35, p <.001). Nonautistic males had significantly better social interaction and communication than males with ASD (SMD = 0.77, p <.001). Nonautistic females also had significantly better social interaction and communication than females with ASD (SMD = 0.72, p <.001). Nonautistic males had better social interaction and communication than females with ASD, though this difference was not significant (SMD = 0.30, p =.07). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted important sex/gender differences in social interaction and communication for individuals with ASD, likely not captured by pre-existing diagnostic instruments, which potentially contribute to the under recognition of autism in females, and may need to be reflected in the diagnostic process.

Autism spectrum disorders, DSM, gender difference, meta-analysis, sex differences
1469-7610
922-936
Wood-Downie, Henry
3ea6dda6-516f-4bc8-9854-186540fb30e0
Wong, Bonnie
c3e27b3e-41bb-419e-acfc-620e4bbecc78
Kovshoff, Hanna
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Hadwin, Julie A.
a364caf0-405a-42f3-a04c-4864817393ee
Wood-Downie, Henry
3ea6dda6-516f-4bc8-9854-186540fb30e0
Wong, Bonnie
c3e27b3e-41bb-419e-acfc-620e4bbecc78
Kovshoff, Hanna
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Hadwin, Julie A.
a364caf0-405a-42f3-a04c-4864817393ee

Wood-Downie, Henry, Wong, Bonnie, Kovshoff, Hanna, Cortese, Samuele and Hadwin, Julie A. (2021) Research review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex/gender differences in social interaction and communication in autistic and non-autistic children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 62 (8), 922-936. (doi:10.1111/jcpp.13337).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: Evidence increasingly suggests that ASD manifests differently in females than males. Previous reviews investigating sex/gender differences in social interaction and social communication have focused at the level of broad constructs (e.g. comparing algorithm scores from pre-existing diagnostic instruments) and have typically reported no significant differences between males and females. However, a number of individual studies have found sex/gender differences in narrow construct domains. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and random effects model meta-analyses (in January 2019 and updated January 2020) that investigated sex/gender differences in narrow construct measures of social communication and interaction in autistic and nonautistic children and adolescents, and adults. Study quality was appraised using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS, BMJ Open, 6, 2016, 1). Results: Across 16 studies (including 2,730 participants), the analysis found that female (vs. male) individuals with ASD had significantly better social interaction and social communication skills (SMD = 0.39, p <.001), which was reflective of a similar sex/gender profile in nonautistic individuals (SMD = 0.35, p <.001). Nonautistic males had significantly better social interaction and communication than males with ASD (SMD = 0.77, p <.001). Nonautistic females also had significantly better social interaction and communication than females with ASD (SMD = 0.72, p <.001). Nonautistic males had better social interaction and communication than females with ASD, though this difference was not significant (SMD = 0.30, p =.07). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted important sex/gender differences in social interaction and communication for individuals with ASD, likely not captured by pre-existing diagnostic instruments, which potentially contribute to the under recognition of autism in females, and may need to be reflected in the diagnostic process.

Text
Sex Gender Differences in Social Interaction and Communication Revision 1 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (356kB)
Text
jcpp.13337 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (830kB)
Text
Child Psychology Psychiatry - 2020 - Wood‐Downie - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 September 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 November 2020
Published date: August 2021
Keywords: Autism spectrum disorders, DSM, gender difference, meta-analysis, sex differences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 444036
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444036
ISSN: 1469-7610
PURE UUID: e8e03918-ee04-4b21-88dd-8665913d79f4
ORCID for Henry Wood-Downie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4965-7778
ORCID for Hanna Kovshoff: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-0376
ORCID for Samuele Cortese: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-8075

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Sep 2020 16:30
Last modified: 13 Sep 2024 04:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bonnie Wong
Author: Hanna Kovshoff ORCID iD
Author: Samuele Cortese ORCID iD
Author: Julie A. Hadwin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×