The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Addressing embodied inequities in health: how do we enable improvement in women's diet in pregnancy?

Addressing embodied inequities in health: how do we enable improvement in women's diet in pregnancy?
Addressing embodied inequities in health: how do we enable improvement in women's diet in pregnancy?
Objective:
To disrupt cycles of health inequity, traceable to dietary inequities in the earliest stages of life, public health interventions should target improving nutritional wellbeing in preconception/pregnancy environments. This requires a deep engagement with pregnant/postpartum people (PPP) and their communities (including their health and social care providers, HSCP). We sought to understand the factors that influence diet during pregnancy from the perspectives of PPP and HSCP, and to outline intervention priorities.

Design:
We carried out thematic network analyses of transcripts from ten focus group discussions (FGD) and one stakeholder engagement meeting with PPP and HSCP in a Canadian city. Identified themes were developed into conceptual maps, highlighting local priorities for pregnancy nutrition and intervention development.

Setting:
FGD and the stakeholder meeting were run in predominantly lower socioeconomic position (SEP) neighbourhoods in the sociodemographically diverse city of Hamilton, Canada.

Participants:
All local, comprising twenty-two lower SEP PPP and forty-three HSCP.

Results:
Salient themes were resilience, resources, relationships and the embodied experience of pregnancy. Both PPP and HSCP underscored that socioeconomic-political forces operating at multiple levels largely determined the availability of individual and relational resources constraining diet during pregnancy. Intervention proposals focused on cultivating individual and community resilience to improve early-life nutritional environments. Participants called for better-integrated services, greater income supports and strengthened support programmes.

Conclusions:
Hamilton stakeholders foregrounded social determinants of inequity as main factors influencing pregnancy diet. They further indicated a need to develop interventions that build resilience and redistribute resources at multiple levels, from the household to the state.
Community engagement, Developmental origins, Dietary inequities, Health inequities, Pregnancy
1368-9800
2994-3004
McKerracher, L.
fbdb8e61-5a2e-41a6-a2e3-b429fd7e79fb
Oresnik, S.
318bdbf0-d4f5-4088-9e0e-d02ee359fdb7
Moffat, T.
96237a64-3039-4cbe-b9d3-ce5c2a06523a
Murray Davies, B.
4485fb9b-665f-47a7-ab16-ab23293c79a5
Vickers-Manzin, J.
e5b02f15-9929-425b-8165-8d3f2c194d27
Zalot, L.
00da562d-8d1b-4eff-8d2b-2cb6f3c4f7d4
Williams, D
08e26dc1-a8a8-4e3e-8fe3-d21b73ffeae9
Sloboda, D.M.
6ce36e7c-9182-450e-820d-3de47c1fc5fb
Barker, M.E.
374310ad-d308-44af-b6da-515bf5d2d6d2
McKerracher, L.
fbdb8e61-5a2e-41a6-a2e3-b429fd7e79fb
Oresnik, S.
318bdbf0-d4f5-4088-9e0e-d02ee359fdb7
Moffat, T.
96237a64-3039-4cbe-b9d3-ce5c2a06523a
Murray Davies, B.
4485fb9b-665f-47a7-ab16-ab23293c79a5
Vickers-Manzin, J.
e5b02f15-9929-425b-8165-8d3f2c194d27
Zalot, L.
00da562d-8d1b-4eff-8d2b-2cb6f3c4f7d4
Williams, D
08e26dc1-a8a8-4e3e-8fe3-d21b73ffeae9
Sloboda, D.M.
6ce36e7c-9182-450e-820d-3de47c1fc5fb
Barker, M.E.
374310ad-d308-44af-b6da-515bf5d2d6d2

McKerracher, L., Oresnik, S., Moffat, T., Murray Davies, B., Vickers-Manzin, J., Zalot, L., Williams, D, Sloboda, D.M. and Barker, M.E. (2020) Addressing embodied inequities in health: how do we enable improvement in women's diet in pregnancy? Public Health Nutrition, 23 (16), 2994-3004. (doi:10.1017/S1368980020001093).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective:
To disrupt cycles of health inequity, traceable to dietary inequities in the earliest stages of life, public health interventions should target improving nutritional wellbeing in preconception/pregnancy environments. This requires a deep engagement with pregnant/postpartum people (PPP) and their communities (including their health and social care providers, HSCP). We sought to understand the factors that influence diet during pregnancy from the perspectives of PPP and HSCP, and to outline intervention priorities.

Design:
We carried out thematic network analyses of transcripts from ten focus group discussions (FGD) and one stakeholder engagement meeting with PPP and HSCP in a Canadian city. Identified themes were developed into conceptual maps, highlighting local priorities for pregnancy nutrition and intervention development.

Setting:
FGD and the stakeholder meeting were run in predominantly lower socioeconomic position (SEP) neighbourhoods in the sociodemographically diverse city of Hamilton, Canada.

Participants:
All local, comprising twenty-two lower SEP PPP and forty-three HSCP.

Results:
Salient themes were resilience, resources, relationships and the embodied experience of pregnancy. Both PPP and HSCP underscored that socioeconomic-political forces operating at multiple levels largely determined the availability of individual and relational resources constraining diet during pregnancy. Intervention proposals focused on cultivating individual and community resilience to improve early-life nutritional environments. Participants called for better-integrated services, greater income supports and strengthened support programmes.

Conclusions:
Hamilton stakeholders foregrounded social determinants of inequity as main factors influencing pregnancy diet. They further indicated a need to develop interventions that build resilience and redistribute resources at multiple levels, from the household to the state.

Text
Anon_addr_inequitiesPHN_feb242020rev - Accepted Manuscript
Download (107kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 March 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 July 2020
Published date: 1 November 2020
Additional Information: Funding Information: Acknowledgements: The study reported here would have been impossible without the support of a number of people and organisations. Next, we express our gratitude for the practical and logistical support we received from our partners in Hamilton’s Public Health Services and in Hamilton’s Ontario Early Years Centres. We would especially like to highlight the integral roles of Michaela Servos, Kathy Pierce, Laura Wilson and their staff and colleagues who collectively run a variety of programmes aimed at improving maternal–child health, wellbeing and nutrition in the city of Hamilton. Much of our study promotion was carried out through and with these organisations, with the support and encouragement of their leaders and staff. We also thank other members of the M2B study team, especially Debbie Kao and Fei Fei Xia, along with members of the Sloboda Lab, for insightful comments on earlier presentations of our data. Finally, our deepest gratitude goes to the twenty-two PPP who took time from their hectic lives to participate in FGD and a stakeholder meeting with members of our team. Financial support: We acknowledge the contributions of our funders – the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Hugs for Health Team Grant, no. 146333), the Women’s College Hospital (XChange Grant 15k Challenge) and McMaster University (Provost’s Award). Conflict of interest: We have no conflicts of interest to declare. Authorship: All authors contributed to the design of the study, spearheaded by D.M.S. and M.B. Additionally, all authors participated in a minimum of one analytical discussion session, and agreed on data interpretation and data presentation strategy. L.M. and M.B. wrote the manuscript and sketched first drafts of the figures. L.M. and S.O. constructed data tables. S.O. developed the final digital versions of figures. All authors read, edited, discussed and approved the submitted manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: The current study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Copyright © © McMaster University and The Author(s), 2020
Keywords: Community engagement, Developmental origins, Dietary inequities, Health inequities, Pregnancy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 444178
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444178
ISSN: 1368-9800
PURE UUID: 637e4e7c-65e2-43f6-bf3f-cf17ab8c7253
ORCID for M.E. Barker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2976-0217

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Sep 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. McKerracher
Author: S. Oresnik
Author: T. Moffat
Author: B. Murray Davies
Author: J. Vickers-Manzin
Author: L. Zalot
Author: D Williams
Author: D.M. Sloboda
Author: M.E. Barker ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×