Protocol for randomised controlled feasibility study comparing cruroplasty with circumferential DynaMesh-HIATUS® versus suture-only repair for large hiatus hernias
Protocol for randomised controlled feasibility study comparing cruroplasty with circumferential DynaMesh-HIATUS® versus suture-only repair for large hiatus hernias
Laparoscopic fundoplication has become a standard surgical treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Many of these patients also have a hiatus hernia that is repaired at the same time. However, suture-only repair of larger hiatus hernias has recurrence rates as high as 50%. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of surgical mesh to reinforce hiatal repair compared with suture-only repair is currently lacking. This study aims to assess the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial comparing the results of large hiatus hernia repair with DynaMesh-HIATUS® crural reinforcement versus standard suture repair alone. This is a single-centre, double-blind, parallel group randomised feasibility study. Forty patients with large hiatus hernia will be randomised to standard laparoscopic suture repair or suture repair with cruroplasty using the DynaMesh-HIATUS® circumferential mesh, with a 3-year follow-up period. Participants and assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Outcomes include trial process indicators (eligible participants, recruitment, and retention rates), surgical indicators (placement of mesh, operative complications, length of stay), adverse events, patient quality of life and symptom scores and mesh position after 1 year, and patient quality of life measures to 3 years. Feasibility will be assessed by rates of recruitment, retention, and successful surgical procedures. Clinical and patient-related outcomes for the two surgical methods will be described, and those most appropriate to include in a definitive trial identified. Correlation will be made between the position of the mesh on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical outcomes. The DYNAMIC study will provide information to design and deliver a definitive randomised controlled trial of DynaMesh-HIATUS® cruroplasty compared with suture repair alone. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN76437720
Darbyshire, Alexander
455a6d36-8dba-4d7e-8bfc-70506a0f6a68
May-Miller, Peter
45082025-0446-4054-a42c-2fd38eb6269f
Fogg, Carole
42057537-d443-462a-8944-c804252c973b
Knight, Benjamin
e18ac89e-bae5-4990-a9b3-8e3d7f2b1c12
Toh, Simon
29a101d4-47c1-405d-ae26-8082d10a2708
Darbyshire, Alexander
455a6d36-8dba-4d7e-8bfc-70506a0f6a68
May-Miller, Peter
45082025-0446-4054-a42c-2fd38eb6269f
Fogg, Carole
42057537-d443-462a-8944-c804252c973b
Knight, Benjamin
e18ac89e-bae5-4990-a9b3-8e3d7f2b1c12
Toh, Simon
29a101d4-47c1-405d-ae26-8082d10a2708
Darbyshire, Alexander, May-Miller, Peter, Fogg, Carole, Knight, Benjamin and Toh, Simon
(2020)
Protocol for randomised controlled feasibility study comparing cruroplasty with circumferential DynaMesh-HIATUS® versus suture-only repair for large hiatus hernias.
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.
(doi:10.1007/s42399-020-00519-2).
Abstract
Laparoscopic fundoplication has become a standard surgical treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Many of these patients also have a hiatus hernia that is repaired at the same time. However, suture-only repair of larger hiatus hernias has recurrence rates as high as 50%. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of surgical mesh to reinforce hiatal repair compared with suture-only repair is currently lacking. This study aims to assess the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial comparing the results of large hiatus hernia repair with DynaMesh-HIATUS® crural reinforcement versus standard suture repair alone. This is a single-centre, double-blind, parallel group randomised feasibility study. Forty patients with large hiatus hernia will be randomised to standard laparoscopic suture repair or suture repair with cruroplasty using the DynaMesh-HIATUS® circumferential mesh, with a 3-year follow-up period. Participants and assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Outcomes include trial process indicators (eligible participants, recruitment, and retention rates), surgical indicators (placement of mesh, operative complications, length of stay), adverse events, patient quality of life and symptom scores and mesh position after 1 year, and patient quality of life measures to 3 years. Feasibility will be assessed by rates of recruitment, retention, and successful surgical procedures. Clinical and patient-related outcomes for the two surgical methods will be described, and those most appropriate to include in a definitive trial identified. Correlation will be made between the position of the mesh on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical outcomes. The DYNAMIC study will provide information to design and deliver a definitive randomised controlled trial of DynaMesh-HIATUS® cruroplasty compared with suture repair alone. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN76437720
Text
Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study Comparing Cruroplasty with Circumferential DynaMesh-HIATUS® Versus Suture-Only Repair for Large Hiatus Hernias
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 10 September 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 September 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 444283
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444283
PURE UUID: 7e17098f-acae-4fe0-bba5-14e53d6566a9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Oct 2020 16:51
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alexander Darbyshire
Author:
Peter May-Miller
Author:
Benjamin Knight
Author:
Simon Toh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics