The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Are trainees working in obstetrics and gynecology confident and competent in the care of frail gynecological oncology patients?

Are trainees working in obstetrics and gynecology confident and competent in the care of frail gynecological oncology patients?
Are trainees working in obstetrics and gynecology confident and competent in the care of frail gynecological oncology patients?
Introduction
Older patients undergoing cancer surgery are at increased risk of post-operative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and mortality. Identification of frailty can help predict patients at high risk of peri-operative complications and allow a collaborative, multidisciplinary team approach to their care. A survey was conducted to assess the confidence and knowledge of trainees in obstetrics and gynecology regarding identification and management of peri-operative issues encountered in frail gynecological oncology patients.

Methods
A web-based survey was distributed via the Audit and Research in Gynaecological Oncology (ARGO) collaborative and UK Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (UKARCOG) . The survey on the management of frail peri-operative patients was disseminated to doctors-in-training (trainees) working in obstetrics and gynecology in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. Specialty (ST1–7), subspecialty, and general practice trainees, non-training grade doctors, and foundation year doctors currently working in obstetrics and gynecology were eligible. Consultants were excluded. Study data were collected using REDCAP software hosted at the University of Manchester. Responses were collected over a 6-week period between January and February 2020.

Results
Of the 666 trainees who participated, 67% (425/666) reported inadequate training in peri-operative management of frail patients. Validated frailty assessment tools were used by only 9% (59/638) of trainees and less than 1% (4/613) were able to correctly identify all the diagnostic features of frailty. Common misconceptions included the use of chronological age and gender in frailty assessments. The majority of trainees (76.5%, 448/586) correctly answered a series of questions relating to mental capacity; however, only 6% (36/606) were able to correctly identify all three diagnostic features of delirium. A total of 87% (495/571) of trainees supported closer collaboration with geriatricians and a multidisciplinary approach.

Conclusions
Obstetrics and gynecology trainees reported inadequate training in the peri-operative care of frail gynecological oncology patients, and overwhelmingly favored input from geriatricians. Routine use of validated frailty assessment tools may aid diagnosis of frailty in the peri-operative setting. There is an unmet need for formal education in the management of frail surgical patients within the UK and Irish obstetrics and gynecology curriculum.
gynecology, postoperative care, surgical oncology
1048-891X
1959-1965
Owens, Gemma Louise
d1598e7e-a8e0-4615-b91a-daa4281c2011
Sivalingam, Vanitha
35422774-52fc-4ae4-a4ad-c94f9bca7f50
Abdelrahman, Mohamed
a5f62655-d5ff-475f-b86e-d760a44eb21f
Beirne, James P.
7ae3511f-17b7-4faa-a5f7-dc18c8bf096f
Blake, Dominic
1068432e-b98a-41be-8af6-c773fbbe0a9c
Collins, Anna
e90faa67-bd44-4373-9aa9-e61034b4b3c4
Davies, Rhianna
42c6e964-f2c2-40ae-bc9c-9da4df8a8578
Dilley, James
8b2347cf-07a3-4a78-859c-92fdd6560244
Farquharson, Malcolm
c3f5f16d-96ea-4217-8c18-e690b62a270d
Frimpong, Diana
2d443b12-56a0-4d43-9fe0-29a82892bc45
Gomes, Nana
3600e080-36fb-44c4-a3b0-920b7498650f
Hawco, Sarah
74bcad91-4e6d-47f2-b46b-0495aa855c30
Ilenkovan, Narthana
5181ba3a-988b-45ba-b8c3-c7d660de934a
Jones, Eleanor
3c4342c8-9d2e-4d6d-9d04-7fc28d158592
Jones, Sadie Esme Fleur
9df9a431-b043-48ce-8884-f12ea2aa43c2
Khan, Tabassum
bc2b57d8-65c4-4a00-bfd9-654624112984
Leung, Elaine
952298fc-ee35-4fd3-8dc3-1d5c6b45b847
Otify, Mohamed
8a11d2cb-3d3e-49f7-a2e6-b8ea4b7692b9
Parnell, Laura
cee885c9-d27f-47c7-8e19-085833b8968c
Rimmer, Michael P.
7883e9ed-f0d5-4c0a-9e32-730fd9078a39
Ryan, Neil
d31f504f-df63-4aba-8bac-8cf823e3b4ed
Sanderson, Peter
2d088346-693b-4340-bc7a-405173ef0ff9
Stocker, Linden
6990b82e-4431-4e32-8250-309d61e1a01b
Wilkinson, Michael
13c4494c-2155-4aec-9273-da13f58ccce0
Wong, Siewchee
a1de79fb-851d-4680-85ea-6f4be95bfc3c
Bharathan, Rasiah
7213eb0b-4db7-4e75-9a42-1484dfe2c595
Wan, Yee-Loi Louise
f9035160-e269-48b0-a90f-ef187b6f8180
The Audit and Research in Gynaecological Oncology (ARGO) Collaborative
Owens, Gemma Louise
d1598e7e-a8e0-4615-b91a-daa4281c2011
Sivalingam, Vanitha
35422774-52fc-4ae4-a4ad-c94f9bca7f50
Abdelrahman, Mohamed
a5f62655-d5ff-475f-b86e-d760a44eb21f
Beirne, James P.
7ae3511f-17b7-4faa-a5f7-dc18c8bf096f
Blake, Dominic
1068432e-b98a-41be-8af6-c773fbbe0a9c
Collins, Anna
e90faa67-bd44-4373-9aa9-e61034b4b3c4
Davies, Rhianna
42c6e964-f2c2-40ae-bc9c-9da4df8a8578
Dilley, James
8b2347cf-07a3-4a78-859c-92fdd6560244
Farquharson, Malcolm
c3f5f16d-96ea-4217-8c18-e690b62a270d
Frimpong, Diana
2d443b12-56a0-4d43-9fe0-29a82892bc45
Gomes, Nana
3600e080-36fb-44c4-a3b0-920b7498650f
Hawco, Sarah
74bcad91-4e6d-47f2-b46b-0495aa855c30
Ilenkovan, Narthana
5181ba3a-988b-45ba-b8c3-c7d660de934a
Jones, Eleanor
3c4342c8-9d2e-4d6d-9d04-7fc28d158592
Jones, Sadie Esme Fleur
9df9a431-b043-48ce-8884-f12ea2aa43c2
Khan, Tabassum
bc2b57d8-65c4-4a00-bfd9-654624112984
Leung, Elaine
952298fc-ee35-4fd3-8dc3-1d5c6b45b847
Otify, Mohamed
8a11d2cb-3d3e-49f7-a2e6-b8ea4b7692b9
Parnell, Laura
cee885c9-d27f-47c7-8e19-085833b8968c
Rimmer, Michael P.
7883e9ed-f0d5-4c0a-9e32-730fd9078a39
Ryan, Neil
d31f504f-df63-4aba-8bac-8cf823e3b4ed
Sanderson, Peter
2d088346-693b-4340-bc7a-405173ef0ff9
Stocker, Linden
6990b82e-4431-4e32-8250-309d61e1a01b
Wilkinson, Michael
13c4494c-2155-4aec-9273-da13f58ccce0
Wong, Siewchee
a1de79fb-851d-4680-85ea-6f4be95bfc3c
Bharathan, Rasiah
7213eb0b-4db7-4e75-9a42-1484dfe2c595
Wan, Yee-Loi Louise
f9035160-e269-48b0-a90f-ef187b6f8180

Owens, Gemma Louise, Sivalingam, Vanitha, Abdelrahman, Mohamed, Beirne, James P., Blake, Dominic, Collins, Anna, Davies, Rhianna, Dilley, James, Farquharson, Malcolm, Frimpong, Diana, Gomes, Nana, Hawco, Sarah, Ilenkovan, Narthana, Jones, Eleanor, Jones, Sadie Esme Fleur, Khan, Tabassum, Leung, Elaine, Otify, Mohamed, Parnell, Laura, Rimmer, Michael P., Ryan, Neil, Sanderson, Peter, Stocker, Linden, Wilkinson, Michael, Wong, Siewchee, Bharathan, Rasiah and Wan, Yee-Loi Louise , The Audit and Research in Gynaecological Oncology (ARGO) Collaborative (2020) Are trainees working in obstetrics and gynecology confident and competent in the care of frail gynecological oncology patients? International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 30 (12), 1959-1965, [ijgc-2020-001834]. (doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001834).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction
Older patients undergoing cancer surgery are at increased risk of post-operative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and mortality. Identification of frailty can help predict patients at high risk of peri-operative complications and allow a collaborative, multidisciplinary team approach to their care. A survey was conducted to assess the confidence and knowledge of trainees in obstetrics and gynecology regarding identification and management of peri-operative issues encountered in frail gynecological oncology patients.

Methods
A web-based survey was distributed via the Audit and Research in Gynaecological Oncology (ARGO) collaborative and UK Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (UKARCOG) . The survey on the management of frail peri-operative patients was disseminated to doctors-in-training (trainees) working in obstetrics and gynecology in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. Specialty (ST1–7), subspecialty, and general practice trainees, non-training grade doctors, and foundation year doctors currently working in obstetrics and gynecology were eligible. Consultants were excluded. Study data were collected using REDCAP software hosted at the University of Manchester. Responses were collected over a 6-week period between January and February 2020.

Results
Of the 666 trainees who participated, 67% (425/666) reported inadequate training in peri-operative management of frail patients. Validated frailty assessment tools were used by only 9% (59/638) of trainees and less than 1% (4/613) were able to correctly identify all the diagnostic features of frailty. Common misconceptions included the use of chronological age and gender in frailty assessments. The majority of trainees (76.5%, 448/586) correctly answered a series of questions relating to mental capacity; however, only 6% (36/606) were able to correctly identify all three diagnostic features of delirium. A total of 87% (495/571) of trainees supported closer collaboration with geriatricians and a multidisciplinary approach.

Conclusions
Obstetrics and gynecology trainees reported inadequate training in the peri-operative care of frail gynecological oncology patients, and overwhelmingly favored input from geriatricians. Routine use of validated frailty assessment tools may aid diagnosis of frailty in the peri-operative setting. There is an unmet need for formal education in the management of frail surgical patients within the UK and Irish obstetrics and gynecology curriculum.

Text
Main Document (3)-EIC - Accepted Manuscript
Download (158kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 September 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 October 2020
Published date: 1 December 2020
Additional Information: © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Keywords: gynecology, postoperative care, surgical oncology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 444476
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444476
ISSN: 1048-891X
PURE UUID: 491b01c9-d0f8-4a93-9cba-f83b92334b2f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Oct 2020 16:34
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 09:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gemma Louise Owens
Author: Vanitha Sivalingam
Author: Mohamed Abdelrahman
Author: James P. Beirne
Author: Dominic Blake
Author: Anna Collins
Author: Rhianna Davies
Author: James Dilley
Author: Malcolm Farquharson
Author: Diana Frimpong
Author: Nana Gomes
Author: Sarah Hawco
Author: Narthana Ilenkovan
Author: Eleanor Jones
Author: Sadie Esme Fleur Jones
Author: Tabassum Khan
Author: Elaine Leung
Author: Mohamed Otify
Author: Laura Parnell
Author: Michael P. Rimmer
Author: Neil Ryan
Author: Peter Sanderson
Author: Linden Stocker
Author: Michael Wilkinson
Author: Siewchee Wong
Author: Rasiah Bharathan
Author: Yee-Loi Louise Wan
Corporate Author: The Audit and Research in Gynaecological Oncology (ARGO) Collaborative

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×