Influence of the Month of Birth and Persistence of ADHD in Prospective Studies: Protocol for an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
Influence of the Month of Birth and Persistence of ADHD in Prospective Studies: Protocol for an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
Introduction: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with symptoms, especially the hyperactive ones, that tend to decrease in severity with age. Interestingly, children born just before the school-entry cut-off date (i.e., the youngest pupils of a classroom) are at higher risk of being diagnosed with ADHD compared to children born just after the cut-off date. Noteworthy, this month-of-birth effect tends to disappear with increasing absolute age. Therefore, it is possible that young children erroneously diagnosed with ADHD due to their month of birth present a lower chance to have their diagnosis confirmed at later age, artificially reinforcing the low persistence of ADHD across the lifespan. This protocol outlines an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of prospective observational studies to explore the role of month of birth in the low persistence of ADHD across the lifespan.
Methods and analysis: five databases will be systematically searched in order to find prospective observational studies where the presence of ADHD is assessed both at baseline and at a follow-up of at least four years. We will use a two-stage IPD meta-analytic approach to estimate the role of month of birth in the persistence of ADHD. Various sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the results.
Ethics and dissemination: no additional data will be collected and no deidentified raw data will be used. Ethics approval is thus not required for the present study. Results of this IPD meta-analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Gosling, Corentin
bedea316-94ad-44c7-a171-a978e4654581
Pinabiaux, Charlotte
ad150028-591a-4233-8093-739a13f9d4d4
Caparos, Serge
031c7c97-b95c-4838-8a42-3e10a63e3339
Delorme, Richard
7a080da7-d547-43a7-a9b7-5e250c381e38
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Gosling, Corentin
bedea316-94ad-44c7-a171-a978e4654581
Pinabiaux, Charlotte
ad150028-591a-4233-8093-739a13f9d4d4
Caparos, Serge
031c7c97-b95c-4838-8a42-3e10a63e3339
Delorme, Richard
7a080da7-d547-43a7-a9b7-5e250c381e38
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Gosling, Corentin, Pinabiaux, Charlotte, Caparos, Serge, Delorme, Richard and Cortese, Samuele
(2020)
Influence of the Month of Birth and Persistence of ADHD in Prospective Studies: Protocol for an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
BMJ Open, 10 (11).
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040952).
Abstract
Introduction: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with symptoms, especially the hyperactive ones, that tend to decrease in severity with age. Interestingly, children born just before the school-entry cut-off date (i.e., the youngest pupils of a classroom) are at higher risk of being diagnosed with ADHD compared to children born just after the cut-off date. Noteworthy, this month-of-birth effect tends to disappear with increasing absolute age. Therefore, it is possible that young children erroneously diagnosed with ADHD due to their month of birth present a lower chance to have their diagnosis confirmed at later age, artificially reinforcing the low persistence of ADHD across the lifespan. This protocol outlines an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of prospective observational studies to explore the role of month of birth in the low persistence of ADHD across the lifespan.
Methods and analysis: five databases will be systematically searched in order to find prospective observational studies where the presence of ADHD is assessed both at baseline and at a follow-up of at least four years. We will use a two-stage IPD meta-analytic approach to estimate the role of month of birth in the persistence of ADHD. Various sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the results.
Ethics and dissemination: no additional data will be collected and no deidentified raw data will be used. Ethics approval is thus not required for the present study. Results of this IPD meta-analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Text
Revision - Manuscript - Month of birth - BMJ Open
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 November 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 444725
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444725
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: e77266a5-f682-43bd-84bd-0f9ed1531be2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Nov 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Corentin Gosling
Author:
Charlotte Pinabiaux
Author:
Serge Caparos
Author:
Richard Delorme
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics