The acceptability of remote prescribing and postal delivery services for contraceptive pills and treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis
The acceptability of remote prescribing and postal delivery services for contraceptive pills and treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis
Objectives: The
digitalisation of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services offer valuable
opportunities to deliver contraceptive pills and Chlamydia treatment by post. We
aimed to examine the acceptability of remote prescribing and “medication-by-post”
in SRH.
Study design: An online
survey assessing attitudes towards remote management was distributed in three UK
SRH clinics and via an integrated sexually transmitted infection (STI) postal
self-sampling service. Logistic regressions were performed to identify
potential correlates.
Results: There were 1281
participants (74% female and 49% <25 years old). Eight per cent reported having
received medication via post and 83% were willing to receive Chlamydia treatment
and contraceptive pills by post. Lower acceptability was observed among
participants who were: >45 years old OR:0.43(0.23-0.81), screened for STIs
less than once annually OR:0.63(0.42-0.93), concerned about confidentiality OR:0.21(0.90-0.50),
concerned about absence during delivery OR:0.09(0.02-0.32), unwilling to
provide blood pressure readings OR:0.22(0.04-0.97). Higher acceptability was
observed among participants who reported: previously receiving medication by
post OR:4.63(1.44-14.8), preference for home delivery over clinic collection OR:24.1(11.1-51.9),
preference for home STI testing OR:10.3(6.16-17.4), ability to communicate with
health advisors OR:4.01(1.03-15.6), and willingness to: register their real
name OR:3.09(1.43-10.6), complete online health questionnaires OR:3.09(1.43-10.6),
and use generic contraceptive pills OR:2.88(1.21-6.83).
Conclusion: Postal
treatment and entering information online to allow remote prescribing were acceptable
methods for SRH services and should be considered alongside medication
collection in pharmacies. These methods could be particularly useful for
patients facing barriers in accessing SRH. The cost-effectiveness and
implementation of these novel methods of service delivery should be further investigated.
Nadarzynski, Tomasz
218d69a1-d1be-46f4-bead-23071bd4f270
Symonds, Ynez
90ec291a-8d20-4842-8c88-74bf82ac9fae
Carroll, Robert J.
2ea630ba-95a1-48ce-a03a-bba5ab4e7f3a
Gibbs, Jo
865a17f1-45af-4750-8fd9-441350bc80b2
Kidsley, Sally
8d50b7da-b557-42a6-b023-cc7966a86053
Graham, Cynthia
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
Nadarzynski, Tomasz
218d69a1-d1be-46f4-bead-23071bd4f270
Symonds, Ynez
90ec291a-8d20-4842-8c88-74bf82ac9fae
Carroll, Robert J.
2ea630ba-95a1-48ce-a03a-bba5ab4e7f3a
Gibbs, Jo
865a17f1-45af-4750-8fd9-441350bc80b2
Kidsley, Sally
8d50b7da-b557-42a6-b023-cc7966a86053
Graham, Cynthia
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
Nadarzynski, Tomasz, Symonds, Ynez, Carroll, Robert J., Gibbs, Jo, Kidsley, Sally and Graham, Cynthia
(2020)
The acceptability of remote prescribing and postal delivery services for contraceptive pills and treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis.
BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, 47 (3).
Abstract
Objectives: The
digitalisation of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services offer valuable
opportunities to deliver contraceptive pills and Chlamydia treatment by post. We
aimed to examine the acceptability of remote prescribing and “medication-by-post”
in SRH.
Study design: An online
survey assessing attitudes towards remote management was distributed in three UK
SRH clinics and via an integrated sexually transmitted infection (STI) postal
self-sampling service. Logistic regressions were performed to identify
potential correlates.
Results: There were 1281
participants (74% female and 49% <25 years old). Eight per cent reported having
received medication via post and 83% were willing to receive Chlamydia treatment
and contraceptive pills by post. Lower acceptability was observed among
participants who were: >45 years old OR:0.43(0.23-0.81), screened for STIs
less than once annually OR:0.63(0.42-0.93), concerned about confidentiality OR:0.21(0.90-0.50),
concerned about absence during delivery OR:0.09(0.02-0.32), unwilling to
provide blood pressure readings OR:0.22(0.04-0.97). Higher acceptability was
observed among participants who reported: previously receiving medication by
post OR:4.63(1.44-14.8), preference for home delivery over clinic collection OR:24.1(11.1-51.9),
preference for home STI testing OR:10.3(6.16-17.4), ability to communicate with
health advisors OR:4.01(1.03-15.6), and willingness to: register their real
name OR:3.09(1.43-10.6), complete online health questionnaires OR:3.09(1.43-10.6),
and use generic contraceptive pills OR:2.88(1.21-6.83).
Conclusion: Postal
treatment and entering information online to allow remote prescribing were acceptable
methods for SRH services and should be considered alongside medication
collection in pharmacies. These methods could be particularly useful for
patients facing barriers in accessing SRH. The cost-effectiveness and
implementation of these novel methods of service delivery should be further investigated.
Text
Remote prescribing revised final 220920 clean
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 29 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 November 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 444821
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444821
ISSN: 2515-1991
PURE UUID: a0958dea-48ff-4de7-b8c6-16dca80a8588
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Nov 2020 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:02
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Tomasz Nadarzynski
Author:
Ynez Symonds
Author:
Robert J. Carroll
Author:
Jo Gibbs
Author:
Sally Kidsley
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics