The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer on patient survival

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer on patient survival
Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer on patient survival

BACKGROUND: Trials of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy generally require chemotherapy to start within 90 days postoperatively. However, it is unclear, whether the interval between surgery and start of adjuvant therapy (S-AC-interval) impacts the oncological outcome.

METHODS: Using the Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC) data base, we identified patients who underwent radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate analysis of patient characteristics, surgical factors and tumor characteristics regarding their impact on S-AC-interval was performed using Kruskal-Wallis testing and Fisher's exact test. Analysis of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (follow-up time beginning with the start date of adjuvant chemotherapy) was analyzed in relation to S-AC-interval (continuous and dichotomous with a cut-off at 90 days) using Kaplan-Meier method and COX regression analysis.

RESULTS: We identified 238 eligible patients (83.5% male, mean age: 63.4 years, 76.1% T3/T4, 66.4% pN+, 14.7% R+, 70.6% urothelial carcinoma, 71% cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy). The majority of patients (n = 207, 87%) started chemotherapy within 90 days after surgery. Median S-AC-interval was 57 days (interquartile range 32.8). S-AC-interval did not have consistent association with any patient/tumor characteristics or surgery related factors (type of surgery, urinary diversion). Survival analysis using continuous S-AC-interval revealed a trend toward an impact of S-AC-interval on OS (hazard ratio 1.004, 95% confidence ratio 0.9997-1.0084, P = 0.071). With regards to PFS, that impact was shown to be statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.004, 95% confidence ratio 1.0003-1.0075, P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, however, S-AC-interval was negated by tumor and patient related factors (pathological T-stage, N-stage, ECOG performance status). Accounting for eligibility criteria defined in some clinical trials, we extended our analysis dividing S-AC-interval in ≤90 and >90 days. Although we could confirm the trend toward better outcome in patients with a shorter S-AC interval in dichotomous analysis, neither differences in OS nor in PFS reached statistical significance (P = 0.438 and P = 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS: In a large multi-institutional experience, 87% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy received it within the guideline recommended window of 90 days. While it was not possible to determine whether this is the optimal cut-off, early start of adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be reasonable. Regarding prognosis, tumor-related pathological factors abrogated the importance of the S-AC-interval in our analysis.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, Locally advanced bladder cancer, Muscle invasive bladder cancer, RISC data base
1078-1439
934.e1-934.e9
Grunewald, Camilla M
b2302ffa-af0f-497b-ad39-3d84f6b6edfc
Henn, Alina
b8823a4a-c778-488c-ac63-bfe130fa76a8
Galsky, Matthew D
57bcde2a-bfea-490b-8a09-8ee8e28563da
Plimack, Elizabeth R
1813cdc7-c75c-4161-834c-6dc10354c973
Harshman, Lauren C
65c2410e-23a7-49e4-b2ac-05409f320222
Yu, Evan Y
929df91d-9197-40a1-9260-fe52652fa93e
Crabb, Simon J
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Pal, Sumanta K
62b6ea1e-83c1-4ba7-a37a-c813fe15b55c
Alva, Ajjai Shivaram
9d502ceb-759b-469f-b6f9-eda0590bbf12
Powles, Thomas
55539b87-1c5e-45ae-9e07-5b2232c2236c
De Giorgi, Ugo
86c9f3a7-1680-4a3f-a34f-32cab5d47b4f
Agarwal, Neeraj
ca5b2c21-6702-48d8-a138-56d7e9cfca17
Bamias, Aristotelis
d7ea23db-1f9f-4ad8-bff7-b3316eec610d
Ladoire, Sylvain
62c6053f-7695-4c1e-aa07-eeb98caaf17e
Necchi, Andrea
fb44790a-f8fe-43b6-ad82-72cf5b9107d6
Vaishampayan, Ulka N
377052c6-1d03-4f21-97b6-dd857cd5648c
Sternberg, Cora N
fece0083-29af-4bf4-a90d-04159da38beb
Bellmunt, Joaquim
a9cece8e-55c5-4e2e-bb1f-aec7aa8cba91
Baniel, Jack
fce42171-4c34-4bc1-896b-484471830852
Niegisch, Guenter
e155079b-8120-4472-901c-8a6ca3423024
Grunewald, Camilla M
b2302ffa-af0f-497b-ad39-3d84f6b6edfc
Henn, Alina
b8823a4a-c778-488c-ac63-bfe130fa76a8
Galsky, Matthew D
57bcde2a-bfea-490b-8a09-8ee8e28563da
Plimack, Elizabeth R
1813cdc7-c75c-4161-834c-6dc10354c973
Harshman, Lauren C
65c2410e-23a7-49e4-b2ac-05409f320222
Yu, Evan Y
929df91d-9197-40a1-9260-fe52652fa93e
Crabb, Simon J
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Pal, Sumanta K
62b6ea1e-83c1-4ba7-a37a-c813fe15b55c
Alva, Ajjai Shivaram
9d502ceb-759b-469f-b6f9-eda0590bbf12
Powles, Thomas
55539b87-1c5e-45ae-9e07-5b2232c2236c
De Giorgi, Ugo
86c9f3a7-1680-4a3f-a34f-32cab5d47b4f
Agarwal, Neeraj
ca5b2c21-6702-48d8-a138-56d7e9cfca17
Bamias, Aristotelis
d7ea23db-1f9f-4ad8-bff7-b3316eec610d
Ladoire, Sylvain
62c6053f-7695-4c1e-aa07-eeb98caaf17e
Necchi, Andrea
fb44790a-f8fe-43b6-ad82-72cf5b9107d6
Vaishampayan, Ulka N
377052c6-1d03-4f21-97b6-dd857cd5648c
Sternberg, Cora N
fece0083-29af-4bf4-a90d-04159da38beb
Bellmunt, Joaquim
a9cece8e-55c5-4e2e-bb1f-aec7aa8cba91
Baniel, Jack
fce42171-4c34-4bc1-896b-484471830852
Niegisch, Guenter
e155079b-8120-4472-901c-8a6ca3423024

Grunewald, Camilla M, Henn, Alina, Galsky, Matthew D, Plimack, Elizabeth R, Harshman, Lauren C, Yu, Evan Y, Crabb, Simon J, Pal, Sumanta K, Alva, Ajjai Shivaram, Powles, Thomas, De Giorgi, Ugo, Agarwal, Neeraj, Bamias, Aristotelis, Ladoire, Sylvain, Necchi, Andrea, Vaishampayan, Ulka N, Sternberg, Cora N, Bellmunt, Joaquim, Baniel, Jack and Niegisch, Guenter (2020) Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer on patient survival. Urologic Oncology, 38 (12), 934.e1-934.e9. (doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.008).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trials of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy generally require chemotherapy to start within 90 days postoperatively. However, it is unclear, whether the interval between surgery and start of adjuvant therapy (S-AC-interval) impacts the oncological outcome.

METHODS: Using the Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC) data base, we identified patients who underwent radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate analysis of patient characteristics, surgical factors and tumor characteristics regarding their impact on S-AC-interval was performed using Kruskal-Wallis testing and Fisher's exact test. Analysis of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (follow-up time beginning with the start date of adjuvant chemotherapy) was analyzed in relation to S-AC-interval (continuous and dichotomous with a cut-off at 90 days) using Kaplan-Meier method and COX regression analysis.

RESULTS: We identified 238 eligible patients (83.5% male, mean age: 63.4 years, 76.1% T3/T4, 66.4% pN+, 14.7% R+, 70.6% urothelial carcinoma, 71% cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy). The majority of patients (n = 207, 87%) started chemotherapy within 90 days after surgery. Median S-AC-interval was 57 days (interquartile range 32.8). S-AC-interval did not have consistent association with any patient/tumor characteristics or surgery related factors (type of surgery, urinary diversion). Survival analysis using continuous S-AC-interval revealed a trend toward an impact of S-AC-interval on OS (hazard ratio 1.004, 95% confidence ratio 0.9997-1.0084, P = 0.071). With regards to PFS, that impact was shown to be statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.004, 95% confidence ratio 1.0003-1.0075, P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, however, S-AC-interval was negated by tumor and patient related factors (pathological T-stage, N-stage, ECOG performance status). Accounting for eligibility criteria defined in some clinical trials, we extended our analysis dividing S-AC-interval in ≤90 and >90 days. Although we could confirm the trend toward better outcome in patients with a shorter S-AC interval in dichotomous analysis, neither differences in OS nor in PFS reached statistical significance (P = 0.438 and P = 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS: In a large multi-institutional experience, 87% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy received it within the guideline recommended window of 90 days. While it was not possible to determine whether this is the optimal cut-off, early start of adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be reasonable. Regarding prognosis, tumor-related pathological factors abrogated the importance of the S-AC-interval in our analysis.

Text
Revised final version - Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer on patient survival - Accepted Manuscript
Download (183kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 June 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 July 2020
Published date: December 2020
Additional Information: Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Adjuvant chemotherapy, Locally advanced bladder cancer, Muscle invasive bladder cancer, RISC data base

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 445550
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445550
ISSN: 1078-1439
PURE UUID: 4e3bdcb6-c60c-4486-81c1-b7e1ffd40f5a
ORCID for Simon J Crabb: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-9064

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Dec 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Camilla M Grunewald
Author: Alina Henn
Author: Matthew D Galsky
Author: Elizabeth R Plimack
Author: Lauren C Harshman
Author: Evan Y Yu
Author: Simon J Crabb ORCID iD
Author: Sumanta K Pal
Author: Ajjai Shivaram Alva
Author: Thomas Powles
Author: Ugo De Giorgi
Author: Neeraj Agarwal
Author: Aristotelis Bamias
Author: Sylvain Ladoire
Author: Andrea Necchi
Author: Ulka N Vaishampayan
Author: Cora N Sternberg
Author: Joaquim Bellmunt
Author: Jack Baniel
Author: Guenter Niegisch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×