The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Personal Protective Equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19

Personal Protective Equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19
Personal Protective Equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have had to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for prolonged periods. This has been associated with detrimental effects, especially in relation to the skin health. The present study describes a comprehensive survey of healthcare workers (HCWs) to describe their experiences using PPE in managing COVID-19 patients, with a particular focus on adverse skin reactions. A 24-hour prevalence study and multi-centre prospective survey were designed to capture the impact of PPE on skin health of hospital staff. Questionnaires incorporated demographics of participants, PPE type, usage time, and removal frequency. Participants reported the nature and location of any corresponding adverse skin reactions. The prevalence study included all staff in intensive care from a single centre, while the prospective study used a convenience sample of staff from three acute care providers in the United Kingdom. A total of 108 staff were recruited into the prevalence study, while 307 HCWs from a variety of professional backgrounds and demographics participated in the prospective study. Various skin adverse reactions were reported for the prevalence study, with the bridge of the nose (69%) and ears (30%) being the most affected. Of the six adverse skin reactions recorded for the prospective study, the most common were redness blanching (33%), itchiness (22%), and pressure damage (12%). These occurred predominantly at the bridge of the nose and the ears. There were significant associations (P <.05) between the adverse skin reactions with both the average daily time of PPE usage and the frequency of PPE relief. The comprehensive study revealed that the use of PPE leads to an array of skin reactions at various facial locations of HCWs. Improvements in guidelines are required for PPE usage to protect skin health. In addition, modifications to PPE designs are required to accommodate a range of face shapes and appropriate materials to improve device safety.

COVID-19, personal protective equipment (PPE), pressure ulcers, respirator protective equipment (RPE), skin adverse reactions
1742-4801
312-322
Abiakam, Nkemjika
26818cc2-758e-4fa2-b1c3-8fef0ae82c4a
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Jayabal, Hemalatha
8f2b053c-b614-4af2-b332-8ee861ab75f6
Mitchell, Kay
970e7c2c-35f5-497c-9cee-c6ec9bc7a8a9
Jones, Michaela
4696e74e-39d3-4ff4-aae7-31a1c4088987
Fletcher, Jacqui
9828ba29-ecad-47f5-9133-53edcb94fdad
Spratt, Fran
da65664a-257a-47b7-9372-8fb352918c6a
Bader, Daniel
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf
Abiakam, Nkemjika
26818cc2-758e-4fa2-b1c3-8fef0ae82c4a
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Jayabal, Hemalatha
8f2b053c-b614-4af2-b332-8ee861ab75f6
Mitchell, Kay
970e7c2c-35f5-497c-9cee-c6ec9bc7a8a9
Jones, Michaela
4696e74e-39d3-4ff4-aae7-31a1c4088987
Fletcher, Jacqui
9828ba29-ecad-47f5-9133-53edcb94fdad
Spratt, Fran
da65664a-257a-47b7-9372-8fb352918c6a
Bader, Daniel
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf

Abiakam, Nkemjika, Worsley, Peter, Jayabal, Hemalatha, Mitchell, Kay, Jones, Michaela, Fletcher, Jacqui, Spratt, Fran and Bader, Daniel (2021) Personal Protective Equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19. International Wound Journal, 18 (3), 312-322. (doi:10.1111/iwj.13534).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have had to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for prolonged periods. This has been associated with detrimental effects, especially in relation to the skin health. The present study describes a comprehensive survey of healthcare workers (HCWs) to describe their experiences using PPE in managing COVID-19 patients, with a particular focus on adverse skin reactions. A 24-hour prevalence study and multi-centre prospective survey were designed to capture the impact of PPE on skin health of hospital staff. Questionnaires incorporated demographics of participants, PPE type, usage time, and removal frequency. Participants reported the nature and location of any corresponding adverse skin reactions. The prevalence study included all staff in intensive care from a single centre, while the prospective study used a convenience sample of staff from three acute care providers in the United Kingdom. A total of 108 staff were recruited into the prevalence study, while 307 HCWs from a variety of professional backgrounds and demographics participated in the prospective study. Various skin adverse reactions were reported for the prevalence study, with the bridge of the nose (69%) and ears (30%) being the most affected. Of the six adverse skin reactions recorded for the prospective study, the most common were redness blanching (33%), itchiness (22%), and pressure damage (12%). These occurred predominantly at the bridge of the nose and the ears. There were significant associations (P <.05) between the adverse skin reactions with both the average daily time of PPE usage and the frequency of PPE relief. The comprehensive study revealed that the use of PPE leads to an array of skin reactions at various facial locations of HCWs. Improvements in guidelines are required for PPE usage to protect skin health. In addition, modifications to PPE designs are required to accommodate a range of face shapes and appropriate materials to improve device safety.

Text
Personal Protective Equipment related Skin Reactions in Healthcare professionals during COVID - Accepted Manuscript
Download (886kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 November 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 January 2021
Published date: 11 May 2021
Keywords: COVID-19, personal protective equipment (PPE), pressure ulcers, respirator protective equipment (RPE), skin adverse reactions

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 445687
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445687
ISSN: 1742-4801
PURE UUID: 91fbaa3b-e3d6-4972-8532-7d2826f66150
ORCID for Peter Worsley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042
ORCID for Hemalatha Jayabal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-4464
ORCID for Daniel Bader: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-3507

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2021 17:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nkemjika Abiakam
Author: Peter Worsley ORCID iD
Author: Hemalatha Jayabal ORCID iD
Author: Kay Mitchell
Author: Michaela Jones
Author: Jacqui Fletcher
Author: Fran Spratt
Author: Daniel Bader ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×