The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma after previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy for localized disease: A retrospective comparison of different chemotherapy regimens

Treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma after previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy for localized disease: A retrospective comparison of different chemotherapy regimens
Treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma after previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy for localized disease: A retrospective comparison of different chemotherapy regimens

Background: Optimal chemotherapy for patients who received cisplatin for localized urothelial carcinoma (UC) and develop metastatic disease is unclear. We compared the efficacy of platinum-based (PBC) versus non–platinum-based (NPBC) first-line chemotherapy for metastasis. 


Patients and Methods: Data were collected from the Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract (RISC), a database of 3024 patients from 28 international academic centers from 2005 to 2012. Patient inclusion criteria included: (1) predominant UC; (2) any primary tumor site; (3) cT2-4, cN0-N2, cM0; (4) prior receipt of perioperative/radiation cisplatin-containing chemotherapy; and (5) receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the first-line metastatic setting. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to show progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the first day of chemotherapy for metastatic disease to date of censor. 


Results: Eligibility criteria was met by 132 patients (n = 74 PBC; n = 58 NPBC). The median OS was 8.13 months (interquartile range, 4.87-16.64 months) and 8.77 months (interquartile range, 4.01-13.49 months) for PBC and NPBC, respectively. Neither OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.69; P =. 87) nor PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.31; P =. 48) differed for PBC versus NPBC. However, for patients who received chemotherapy more than a year after perioperative/radiation chemotherapy, OS was superior for PBC over NPBC (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.92; P = .03). 


Conclusions: There is no significant outcome difference between PBC and NPBC in patients with metastatic UC who previously received cisplatin-based chemotherapy for localized disease. However, if over a year has elapsed, return to PBC is associated with superior OS. The optimal chemotherapy regimen for metastatic urothelial carcinoma following previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy, administered for localized disease, remains unclear. We found benefit of platinum-based over non–platinum-based first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic disease treated at least 1 year from completion of prior perioperative and/or peri-radiation cisplatin-based chemotherapy. These findings support return to platinum chemotherapy in this clinical scenario.

Bladder cancer, First-line, Neoadjuvant, Platinum, Survival
1558-7673
Do, Olivia A
a2a76c77-7295-4776-990a-f1d493ba9558
Ferris, Lorin A
c52c5284-de44-4be4-8708-fbc951af4073
Holt, Sarah K
43daf173-2101-4270-af02-9931fae0b8b7
Ramos, Jorge D
4152fb92-a4bc-4b00-b635-289d75eae81c
Harshman, Lauren C
65c2410e-23a7-49e4-b2ac-05409f320222
Plimack, Elizabeth R
1813cdc7-c75c-4161-834c-6dc10354c973
Crabb, Simon J
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Pal, Sumanta K
62b6ea1e-83c1-4ba7-a37a-c813fe15b55c
De Giorgi, Ugo
86c9f3a7-1680-4a3f-a34f-32cab5d47b4f
Ladoire, Sylvain
62c6053f-7695-4c1e-aa07-eeb98caaf17e
Baniel, Jack
fce42171-4c34-4bc1-896b-484471830852
Necchi, Andrea
fb44790a-f8fe-43b6-ad82-72cf5b9107d6
Vaishampayan, Ulka N
377052c6-1d03-4f21-97b6-dd857cd5648c
Bamias, Aristotelis
d7ea23db-1f9f-4ad8-bff7-b3316eec610d
Bellmunt, Joaquim
a9cece8e-55c5-4e2e-bb1f-aec7aa8cba91
Srinivas, Sandy
4dd68ce5-fe05-4613-b029-49082edacc32
Dorff, Tanya B
3b3aee84-b38b-405b-977f-2a2a8c164e62
Galsky, Matt D
97ded1fd-60b0-4ba5-adb9-81a9750eb21b
Yu, Evan Y
929df91d-9197-40a1-9260-fe52652fa93e
Do, Olivia A
a2a76c77-7295-4776-990a-f1d493ba9558
Ferris, Lorin A
c52c5284-de44-4be4-8708-fbc951af4073
Holt, Sarah K
43daf173-2101-4270-af02-9931fae0b8b7
Ramos, Jorge D
4152fb92-a4bc-4b00-b635-289d75eae81c
Harshman, Lauren C
65c2410e-23a7-49e4-b2ac-05409f320222
Plimack, Elizabeth R
1813cdc7-c75c-4161-834c-6dc10354c973
Crabb, Simon J
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Pal, Sumanta K
62b6ea1e-83c1-4ba7-a37a-c813fe15b55c
De Giorgi, Ugo
86c9f3a7-1680-4a3f-a34f-32cab5d47b4f
Ladoire, Sylvain
62c6053f-7695-4c1e-aa07-eeb98caaf17e
Baniel, Jack
fce42171-4c34-4bc1-896b-484471830852
Necchi, Andrea
fb44790a-f8fe-43b6-ad82-72cf5b9107d6
Vaishampayan, Ulka N
377052c6-1d03-4f21-97b6-dd857cd5648c
Bamias, Aristotelis
d7ea23db-1f9f-4ad8-bff7-b3316eec610d
Bellmunt, Joaquim
a9cece8e-55c5-4e2e-bb1f-aec7aa8cba91
Srinivas, Sandy
4dd68ce5-fe05-4613-b029-49082edacc32
Dorff, Tanya B
3b3aee84-b38b-405b-977f-2a2a8c164e62
Galsky, Matt D
97ded1fd-60b0-4ba5-adb9-81a9750eb21b
Yu, Evan Y
929df91d-9197-40a1-9260-fe52652fa93e

Do, Olivia A, Ferris, Lorin A, Holt, Sarah K, Ramos, Jorge D, Harshman, Lauren C, Plimack, Elizabeth R, Crabb, Simon J, Pal, Sumanta K, De Giorgi, Ugo, Ladoire, Sylvain, Baniel, Jack, Necchi, Andrea, Vaishampayan, Ulka N, Bamias, Aristotelis, Bellmunt, Joaquim, Srinivas, Sandy, Dorff, Tanya B, Galsky, Matt D and Yu, Evan Y (2020) Treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma after previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy for localized disease: A retrospective comparison of different chemotherapy regimens. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer. (doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2020.10.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Optimal chemotherapy for patients who received cisplatin for localized urothelial carcinoma (UC) and develop metastatic disease is unclear. We compared the efficacy of platinum-based (PBC) versus non–platinum-based (NPBC) first-line chemotherapy for metastasis. 


Patients and Methods: Data were collected from the Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract (RISC), a database of 3024 patients from 28 international academic centers from 2005 to 2012. Patient inclusion criteria included: (1) predominant UC; (2) any primary tumor site; (3) cT2-4, cN0-N2, cM0; (4) prior receipt of perioperative/radiation cisplatin-containing chemotherapy; and (5) receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the first-line metastatic setting. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to show progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the first day of chemotherapy for metastatic disease to date of censor. 


Results: Eligibility criteria was met by 132 patients (n = 74 PBC; n = 58 NPBC). The median OS was 8.13 months (interquartile range, 4.87-16.64 months) and 8.77 months (interquartile range, 4.01-13.49 months) for PBC and NPBC, respectively. Neither OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.69; P =. 87) nor PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.31; P =. 48) differed for PBC versus NPBC. However, for patients who received chemotherapy more than a year after perioperative/radiation chemotherapy, OS was superior for PBC over NPBC (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.92; P = .03). 


Conclusions: There is no significant outcome difference between PBC and NPBC in patients with metastatic UC who previously received cisplatin-based chemotherapy for localized disease. However, if over a year has elapsed, return to PBC is associated with superior OS. The optimal chemotherapy regimen for metastatic urothelial carcinoma following previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy, administered for localized disease, remains unclear. We found benefit of platinum-based over non–platinum-based first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic disease treated at least 1 year from completion of prior perioperative and/or peri-radiation cisplatin-based chemotherapy. These findings support return to platinum chemotherapy in this clinical scenario.

Text
Do - RISC manuscript final 072020 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (71kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 November 2020
Additional Information: Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Bladder cancer, First-line, Neoadjuvant, Platinum, Survival

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 446114
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/446114
ISSN: 1558-7673
PURE UUID: 609a587c-6c6b-45c9-babc-c7bd161745da
ORCID for Simon J Crabb: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-9064

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jan 2021 17:49
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Olivia A Do
Author: Lorin A Ferris
Author: Sarah K Holt
Author: Jorge D Ramos
Author: Lauren C Harshman
Author: Elizabeth R Plimack
Author: Simon J Crabb ORCID iD
Author: Sumanta K Pal
Author: Ugo De Giorgi
Author: Sylvain Ladoire
Author: Jack Baniel
Author: Andrea Necchi
Author: Ulka N Vaishampayan
Author: Aristotelis Bamias
Author: Joaquim Bellmunt
Author: Sandy Srinivas
Author: Tanya B Dorff
Author: Matt D Galsky
Author: Evan Y Yu

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×