The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Defining blast loading ‘zones of relevance’ for primary blast injury research: A consensus of injury criteria for idealised explosive scenarios.

Defining blast loading ‘zones of relevance’ for primary blast injury research: A consensus of injury criteria for idealised explosive scenarios.
Defining blast loading ‘zones of relevance’ for primary blast injury research: A consensus of injury criteria for idealised explosive scenarios.

Blast injuries remain a serious threat to defence and civilian populations around the world. ‘Primary’ blast injuries (PBIs) are caused by direct blast wave interaction with the human body, particularly affecting air-containing organs. Work to define blast loading conditions for injury research has received relatively little attention, though with a continued experimental focus on PBIs and idealised explosion assumptions, meaningful test outcomes and subsequent clinical applications, rely on appropriate simulated conditions. This paper critically evaluates and combines existing PBI criteria (grouped into those affecting the auditory system, pulmonary injuries and brain trauma) as a function of idealised blast wave parameters. For clinical blast injury researchers, analysis of the multi-injury criteria indicates zones of appropriate loading conditions for human-scale test items and demonstrates the importance of simulating blast conditions that are both realistic and relevant to the injury type. For certain explosive scenarios, spatial interpretation of the ‘zones of relevance’ could support emergency response and hazard preparedness by informing triage, patient management and resource allocation, thus leading to improved health outcomes. This work will prove useful to clinical blast injury researchers, blast protection engineers and clinical practitioners involved in the triage, diagnosis, and treatment of PBIs.

Animal models, Blast injury criteria, Civilian, Injury mechanisms, Military, Primary blast injury, Shock tube, Traumatic brain injury
1350-4533
83-92
Denny, Jack
7bd3e650-6c4e-4149-b408-2166e377b216
Dickinson, Alexander
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Langdon, Genevieve
1e02a7da-2f10-47f2-9dfb-2998cb9af816
Denny, Jack
7bd3e650-6c4e-4149-b408-2166e377b216
Dickinson, Alexander
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Langdon, Genevieve
1e02a7da-2f10-47f2-9dfb-2998cb9af816

Denny, Jack, Dickinson, Alexander and Langdon, Genevieve (2021) Defining blast loading ‘zones of relevance’ for primary blast injury research: A consensus of injury criteria for idealised explosive scenarios. Medical Engineering & Physics, 93, 83-92. (doi:10.31224/osf.io/ecqwx).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Blast injuries remain a serious threat to defence and civilian populations around the world. ‘Primary’ blast injuries (PBIs) are caused by direct blast wave interaction with the human body, particularly affecting air-containing organs. Work to define blast loading conditions for injury research has received relatively little attention, though with a continued experimental focus on PBIs and idealised explosion assumptions, meaningful test outcomes and subsequent clinical applications, rely on appropriate simulated conditions. This paper critically evaluates and combines existing PBI criteria (grouped into those affecting the auditory system, pulmonary injuries and brain trauma) as a function of idealised blast wave parameters. For clinical blast injury researchers, analysis of the multi-injury criteria indicates zones of appropriate loading conditions for human-scale test items and demonstrates the importance of simulating blast conditions that are both realistic and relevant to the injury type. For certain explosive scenarios, spatial interpretation of the ‘zones of relevance’ could support emergency response and hazard preparedness by informing triage, patient management and resource allocation, thus leading to improved health outcomes. This work will prove useful to clinical blast injury researchers, blast protection engineers and clinical practitioners involved in the triage, diagnosis, and treatment of PBIs.

Text
Accepted Manuscript (March 2021) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (101kB)

More information

In preparation date: 28 January 2021
Accepted/In Press date: 21 May 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 May 2021
Published date: July 2021
Keywords: Animal models, Blast injury criteria, Civilian, Injury mechanisms, Military, Primary blast injury, Shock tube, Traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 446702
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/446702
ISSN: 1350-4533
PURE UUID: b414e7bc-2cfd-46ba-83db-6d04bcb61ba7
ORCID for Jack Denny: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3181-4747
ORCID for Alexander Dickinson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-1944

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Feb 2021 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jack Denny ORCID iD
Author: Genevieve Langdon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×