The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Treatment outcomes for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: results from a UK patient retrospective cohort study

Treatment outcomes for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: results from a UK patient retrospective cohort study
Treatment outcomes for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: results from a UK patient retrospective cohort study

Purpose: Small cell carcinoma of the bladder (SCCB) is rare, accounting for less than 1% of all bladder carcinomas. It is aggressive, and outcomes are poor as a result of its early metastatic spread. Owing to its rarity, there are limitations on data to propose standardized management pathways. Methods and Materials: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients presenting with pure or predominant-histology SCCB to 26 institutions in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2016. The data cutoff date was February 1, 2018. We report patient characteristics, treatment received, and subsequent clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 409 eligible patients were included. Among these, 306 (74.8%) were male, the median age was 71 years (range, 35-96 years), and 189 patients (46.2%) had pure-histology SCCB. At data cutoff, 301 patients (73.6%) had died. The median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (95% CI, 13.2-18.7 months). Two hundred patients (48.9%) were confirmed to have bladder-confined disease (N0, M0), with a median OS of 28.3 months (95% CI, 20.9-35.8 months), versus a median OS of 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.9-14.6 months) for the 172 patients (42.1%) with confirmed N1-3 and/or M1 disease (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% CI, 1.58-2.60; P < .001). A total of 247 patients (61.5%) received primary chemotherapy, with a median OS of 21.6 months (95% CI, 15.5-27.6 months), versus a median OS of 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.4-12.8 months) in patients who did not receive primary chemotherapy (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.59; P < .001). Choice of chemotherapy agent did not alter outcomes. For those with bladder-confined disease, 61 (30.5%) underwent cystectomy, and 104 (52.0%) received radiation therapy. Survival outcomes were similar for both cystectomy and radiation therapy. Only 6 patients (1.5%) were identified as having brain metastases at any time point. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study of all-stage SCCB to date. Patients have a poor prognosis overall, but survival is improved in those able to receive chemotherapy and with organ-confined disease. Brain metastases are rare.

0360-3016
1143-1150
Chau, C
bc5b21b2-4974-4992-806f-61e90fc5ea63
Rimmer, Y
7c93ce98-ead3-419e-bdac-626463b847ff
Choudhury, A
c45433d6-df9a-4d89-b28f-59b2cdf69984
Leaning, D
c89e3da6-931d-43ea-be37-492066ce0871
Law, A
7589e124-6bdf-4412-bfc4-dcbe8aae2f5a
Enting, D
31a6e287-969d-44fd-bb79-3e82abfc551e
Lim, J H
2997938b-35a3-47a1-a114-f3d824839737
Hafeez, S
462ae8d6-b47e-4088-9456-6238d889f6e1
Khoo, V
493e164e-9b92-408b-bae9-0f390b7539fe
Huddart, R
76d2b300-d66c-4b49-8bee-47755651a4a8
Mitchell, D
e93a76d4-9e0e-4dc1-ae77-0fdb20cf62f4
Henderson, D R
195b7b2d-01f0-4399-8376-1fadad332a6e
McGrane, J
c100e3a6-58e8-4071-a52d-0abff82f1727
Beresford, M
54e0d4a5-3715-4174-a7e5-e732ad6e4134
Vasudev, N
ef74e05b-9b02-4357-bfda-64ab28062e65
Beesley, S
afb81cd0-123e-46bf-bf88-417fde3ae20a
Hilman, S
93a63b88-ece7-4a08-8503-2d6273ea78dd
Manetta, C
f26ecf22-a08b-4942-a7c7-b897dae047cf
Sriram, R
6abd1760-a2f6-459b-b05e-97eaf8163c97
Sharma, A
fac07aec-ed4b-473a-9b73-eb88802f633b
Eswar, C
f96b3e19-9a17-43dd-b9ee-98e6731ea5b7
Treece, S
d9199ca4-e44c-4674-b0bc-fa70d83fbea8
Vilarino-Varela, M
6d0d8e78-1f31-43d2-a60e-e655b1e2107d
Varughese, M
db3fca35-4a28-4996-8e83-9ab8275e1f06
H Glen,
f3ac9e9b-bc8d-4c7e-b4b3-4bdbdb16b1b8
Pintus, E
aad80eef-794d-4bdd-bb46-31e8c665dbdb
Crabb, S
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Chau, C
bc5b21b2-4974-4992-806f-61e90fc5ea63
Rimmer, Y
7c93ce98-ead3-419e-bdac-626463b847ff
Choudhury, A
c45433d6-df9a-4d89-b28f-59b2cdf69984
Leaning, D
c89e3da6-931d-43ea-be37-492066ce0871
Law, A
7589e124-6bdf-4412-bfc4-dcbe8aae2f5a
Enting, D
31a6e287-969d-44fd-bb79-3e82abfc551e
Lim, J H
2997938b-35a3-47a1-a114-f3d824839737
Hafeez, S
462ae8d6-b47e-4088-9456-6238d889f6e1
Khoo, V
493e164e-9b92-408b-bae9-0f390b7539fe
Huddart, R
76d2b300-d66c-4b49-8bee-47755651a4a8
Mitchell, D
e93a76d4-9e0e-4dc1-ae77-0fdb20cf62f4
Henderson, D R
195b7b2d-01f0-4399-8376-1fadad332a6e
McGrane, J
c100e3a6-58e8-4071-a52d-0abff82f1727
Beresford, M
54e0d4a5-3715-4174-a7e5-e732ad6e4134
Vasudev, N
ef74e05b-9b02-4357-bfda-64ab28062e65
Beesley, S
afb81cd0-123e-46bf-bf88-417fde3ae20a
Hilman, S
93a63b88-ece7-4a08-8503-2d6273ea78dd
Manetta, C
f26ecf22-a08b-4942-a7c7-b897dae047cf
Sriram, R
6abd1760-a2f6-459b-b05e-97eaf8163c97
Sharma, A
fac07aec-ed4b-473a-9b73-eb88802f633b
Eswar, C
f96b3e19-9a17-43dd-b9ee-98e6731ea5b7
Treece, S
d9199ca4-e44c-4674-b0bc-fa70d83fbea8
Vilarino-Varela, M
6d0d8e78-1f31-43d2-a60e-e655b1e2107d
Varughese, M
db3fca35-4a28-4996-8e83-9ab8275e1f06
H Glen,
f3ac9e9b-bc8d-4c7e-b4b3-4bdbdb16b1b8
Pintus, E
aad80eef-794d-4bdd-bb46-31e8c665dbdb
Crabb, S
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373

Chau, C, Rimmer, Y, Choudhury, A, Leaning, D, Law, A, Enting, D, Lim, J H, Hafeez, S, Khoo, V, Huddart, R, Mitchell, D, Henderson, D R, McGrane, J, Beresford, M, Vasudev, N, Beesley, S, Hilman, S, Manetta, C, Sriram, R, Sharma, A, Eswar, C, Treece, S, Vilarino-Varela, M, Varughese, M, H Glen, , Pintus, E and Crabb, S (2021) Treatment outcomes for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: results from a UK patient retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 110 (4), 1143-1150. (doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: Small cell carcinoma of the bladder (SCCB) is rare, accounting for less than 1% of all bladder carcinomas. It is aggressive, and outcomes are poor as a result of its early metastatic spread. Owing to its rarity, there are limitations on data to propose standardized management pathways. Methods and Materials: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients presenting with pure or predominant-histology SCCB to 26 institutions in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2016. The data cutoff date was February 1, 2018. We report patient characteristics, treatment received, and subsequent clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 409 eligible patients were included. Among these, 306 (74.8%) were male, the median age was 71 years (range, 35-96 years), and 189 patients (46.2%) had pure-histology SCCB. At data cutoff, 301 patients (73.6%) had died. The median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (95% CI, 13.2-18.7 months). Two hundred patients (48.9%) were confirmed to have bladder-confined disease (N0, M0), with a median OS of 28.3 months (95% CI, 20.9-35.8 months), versus a median OS of 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.9-14.6 months) for the 172 patients (42.1%) with confirmed N1-3 and/or M1 disease (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% CI, 1.58-2.60; P < .001). A total of 247 patients (61.5%) received primary chemotherapy, with a median OS of 21.6 months (95% CI, 15.5-27.6 months), versus a median OS of 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.4-12.8 months) in patients who did not receive primary chemotherapy (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.59; P < .001). Choice of chemotherapy agent did not alter outcomes. For those with bladder-confined disease, 61 (30.5%) underwent cystectomy, and 104 (52.0%) received radiation therapy. Survival outcomes were similar for both cystectomy and radiation therapy. Only 6 patients (1.5%) were identified as having brain metastases at any time point. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study of all-stage SCCB to date. Patients have a poor prognosis overall, but survival is improved in those able to receive chemotherapy and with organ-confined disease. Brain metastases are rare.

Text
Chau et al Red Journal revision CLEAN - Accepted Manuscript
Download (69kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 February 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 February 2021
Published date: 15 July 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: We thank Drs H. Markham, H. Bentley, R. Iype, H. Nightingale, S. Nagarajan, J. Morgan, T. Young, S. Sundar, M. Serra, K. Skordilis, T. Wilson, V.-R. Sim, C. Vivekananthan, S. Jagdev, A. Henry, and J. Joseph and Ms J. Richards for their contribution. Publisher Copyright: © 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447025
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447025
ISSN: 0360-3016
PURE UUID: 45381143-9a5b-488d-ac4b-1a4f6a885e28
ORCID for S Crabb: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-9064

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Mar 2021 17:30
Last modified: 12 Sep 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C Chau
Author: Y Rimmer
Author: A Choudhury
Author: D Leaning
Author: A Law
Author: D Enting
Author: J H Lim
Author: S Hafeez
Author: V Khoo
Author: R Huddart
Author: D Mitchell
Author: D R Henderson
Author: J McGrane
Author: M Beresford
Author: N Vasudev
Author: S Beesley
Author: S Hilman
Author: C Manetta
Author: R Sriram
Author: A Sharma
Author: C Eswar
Author: S Treece
Author: M Vilarino-Varela
Author: M Varughese
Author: H Glen
Author: E Pintus
Author: S Crabb ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×