The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comment on ‘‘Impact of water on the BrO + HO2 gas-phase reaction: mechanism, kinetics and products’’ by N. T. Tsona, S. Tang and L. Du, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 20296

Comment on ‘‘Impact of water on the BrO + HO2 gas-phase reaction: mechanism, kinetics and products’’ by N. T. Tsona, S. Tang and L. Du, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 20296
Comment on ‘‘Impact of water on the BrO + HO2 gas-phase reaction: mechanism, kinetics and products’’ by N. T. Tsona, S. Tang and L. Du, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 20296

The reaction, BrO + HO2 → HOBr + O2, is exothermic and can produce O2 in both its ground state (X3∑g-) and its first excited state (ã1Δg). As a result, this reaction can proceed on both a singlet and a triplet potential energy surface. Recently, Tsona, Tang and Du published a paper entitled "Impact of water on the BrO + HO2 gas-phase reaction: mechanism, kinetics and products (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 20296-203072). The results of this work showed significant differences from those published earlier on this reaction by Chow et al. (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 30554-30569). Further calculations performed in this present work, combined with higher level calculations published by Chow et al. (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 30554-30569), demonstrate that the work of Tsona et al. is flawed because the integration grid size used in their lowest singlet and triplet calculations is too small, and a closed-shell wavefunction, rather than an open-shell wavefunction, has been used for the singlet surface. The major conclusion in the work of Tsona et al. that the lowest singlet and triplet channels are barrierless is shown to be incorrect. Also, the computed rate coefficients of Tsona et al. showed a positive temperature dependence, which is inconsistent with the experimentally observed negative temperature dependence, whereas the singlet rate coefficients computed by Chow et al. (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 30554-30569) showed a negative temperature dependence consistent with experiment.

1463-9076
6309-6315
Chow, Ronald
b9dcf296-af75-47d6-b343-c22abaa357c1
Mok, Daniel K. W.
1bbfba3e-c2e8-4225-8e07-cb6208ad83e1
Lee, Edmond P. F.
c54ce72b-3148-46ac-83fd-2d83d23d485f
Dyke, John
46393b45-6694-46f3-af20-d7369d26199f
Chow, Ronald
b9dcf296-af75-47d6-b343-c22abaa357c1
Mok, Daniel K. W.
1bbfba3e-c2e8-4225-8e07-cb6208ad83e1
Lee, Edmond P. F.
c54ce72b-3148-46ac-83fd-2d83d23d485f
Dyke, John
46393b45-6694-46f3-af20-d7369d26199f

Chow, Ronald, Mok, Daniel K. W., Lee, Edmond P. F. and Dyke, John (2021) Comment on ‘‘Impact of water on the BrO + HO2 gas-phase reaction: mechanism, kinetics and products’’ by N. T. Tsona, S. Tang and L. Du, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 20296. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 23 (10), 6309-6315. (doi:10.1039/d0cp00222d).

Record type: Letter

Abstract

The reaction, BrO + HO2 → HOBr + O2, is exothermic and can produce O2 in both its ground state (X3∑g-) and its first excited state (ã1Δg). As a result, this reaction can proceed on both a singlet and a triplet potential energy surface. Recently, Tsona, Tang and Du published a paper entitled "Impact of water on the BrO + HO2 gas-phase reaction: mechanism, kinetics and products (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 20296-203072). The results of this work showed significant differences from those published earlier on this reaction by Chow et al. (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 30554-30569). Further calculations performed in this present work, combined with higher level calculations published by Chow et al. (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 30554-30569), demonstrate that the work of Tsona et al. is flawed because the integration grid size used in their lowest singlet and triplet calculations is too small, and a closed-shell wavefunction, rather than an open-shell wavefunction, has been used for the singlet surface. The major conclusion in the work of Tsona et al. that the lowest singlet and triplet channels are barrierless is shown to be incorrect. Also, the computed rate coefficients of Tsona et al. showed a positive temperature dependence, which is inconsistent with the experimentally observed negative temperature dependence, whereas the singlet rate coefficients computed by Chow et al. (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 30554-30569) showed a negative temperature dependence consistent with experiment.

Text
COMMENTFINALBrO+HO2jmd (1) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (71kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 March 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 March 2021
Published date: 14 March 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 448272
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/448272
ISSN: 1463-9076
PURE UUID: f215200a-52f4-4227-a843-6c08c5baabdb
ORCID for John Dyke: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9808-303X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2021 16:30
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 04:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ronald Chow
Author: Daniel K. W. Mok
Author: Edmond P. F. Lee
Author: John Dyke ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×