Experiences of support for sexual dysfunction in men with prostate cancer: findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study
Experiences of support for sexual dysfunction in men with prostate cancer: findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study
Background: men with prostate cancer (PCa) often experience sexual dysfunction following diagnosis and treatment, yet little is known about the support they receive to deal with this.
Aim: to explore men's experiences of support for sexual dysfunction following PCa diagnosis.
Methods: this study included a U.K.-wide survey of men 18–42 months post-diagnosis of PCa, identified through cancer registries. The survey measured sexual function and the extent to which men perceived sexual dysfunction to be a problem (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26), access to and experience of medications, devices, and specialist services for sexual dysfunction, and included a free-text question for further comments. Analysis focussed on men who reported poor sexual function, which they considered a moderate or big problem. Descriptive statistics explored the characteristics of men offered intervention and those that found this helpful. Free-text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Outcome: the main outcome of this study was to assess access to and experience of medications, devices, and specialist services for sexual dysfunction. Results: 39.0% of all survey respondents (13,978/35,823) reported poor sexual function, which they considered a moderate or big problem. 51.7% of these men were not offered any intervention to aid sexual functioning. 71.9% of those offered an intervention reported trying it, of whom 48.7% found the intervention helpful. Men treated with surgery or brachytherapy were most likely to be offered an intervention. Medication was the most commonly offered intervention and 39.3% of those who tried medication found this helpful. Although offered less often, approximately half of the men who tried devices or attended specialist services found the intervention helpful. Free-text responses indicated that barriers to accessing support included inadequate information and support from healthcare professionals, embarrassment, negative views about treatment options, concerns about side effects and safety, and inconsistencies between secondary and primary care. Barriers to continuing use included limited effectiveness of treatments, inadequate ongoing support, and funding constraints. Drivers of sexual recovery included patient proactivity and persistence with trying different treatment options and ongoing support from health professionals. Clinical Implications: There is an urgent need to ensure that all men are offered, and have equal access to, sexual care support, with referral to specialist services when required. Strengths & Limitations: This study presents data from a large, U.K.-wide, population-based study of men with PCa and includes quantitative and qualitative findings. The possibility of non-response bias should, however, be considered. Conclusion: There are significant shortcomings in the support offered to U.K. men with sexual dysfunction following diagnosis and treatment for PCa which need to be addressed. E Watson, S Wilding, L Matheson, et al. Experiences of Support for Sexual Dysfunction in Men With Prostate Cancer: Findings From a U.K.-Wide Mixed Methods Study. J Sex Med 2021;XX:XXX–XXX.
Free Text, LAPCD, Prostate Cancer, Sexual Aids, Sexual Dysfunction, Supportive Care
515-525
Watson, Eila
6113ed91-1c25-41b9-8034-deb56db98424
Wilding, Sarah
7bccb041-8906-4c7a-8d0f-153e8ceb63c4
Matheson, Lauren
4e548e54-983a-4c9e-ae99-22423ffeb69c
Brett, Jo
0b0cee91-6b1a-48d7-83e5-a58bb1472bd7
McCaughan, Eilis
ad11d514-7451-4a13-8743-424a22027fb0
Downing, Amy
299e08f1-6b70-4dc6-8728-f89e7b2cab1e
Cross, William
e59d3098-e39a-439a-8842-96f23f4412ce
Selby, Peter
1986b302-f05e-40ed-bf85-dcfcc5742715
Butcher, Hugh
e092a262-86c3-4a08-8724-328932cc682d
Glaser, Adam
cd9ec1e8-f9ed-4451-a404-b8a93c2b3089
Wagland, Richard
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08
1 March 2021
Watson, Eila
6113ed91-1c25-41b9-8034-deb56db98424
Wilding, Sarah
7bccb041-8906-4c7a-8d0f-153e8ceb63c4
Matheson, Lauren
4e548e54-983a-4c9e-ae99-22423ffeb69c
Brett, Jo
0b0cee91-6b1a-48d7-83e5-a58bb1472bd7
McCaughan, Eilis
ad11d514-7451-4a13-8743-424a22027fb0
Downing, Amy
299e08f1-6b70-4dc6-8728-f89e7b2cab1e
Cross, William
e59d3098-e39a-439a-8842-96f23f4412ce
Selby, Peter
1986b302-f05e-40ed-bf85-dcfcc5742715
Butcher, Hugh
e092a262-86c3-4a08-8724-328932cc682d
Glaser, Adam
cd9ec1e8-f9ed-4451-a404-b8a93c2b3089
Wagland, Richard
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08
Watson, Eila, Wilding, Sarah, Matheson, Lauren, Brett, Jo, McCaughan, Eilis, Downing, Amy, Cross, William, Selby, Peter, Butcher, Hugh, Glaser, Adam and Wagland, Richard
(2021)
Experiences of support for sexual dysfunction in men with prostate cancer: findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study.
Journal of Sexual Medicine, 18 (3), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.12.017).
Abstract
Background: men with prostate cancer (PCa) often experience sexual dysfunction following diagnosis and treatment, yet little is known about the support they receive to deal with this.
Aim: to explore men's experiences of support for sexual dysfunction following PCa diagnosis.
Methods: this study included a U.K.-wide survey of men 18–42 months post-diagnosis of PCa, identified through cancer registries. The survey measured sexual function and the extent to which men perceived sexual dysfunction to be a problem (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26), access to and experience of medications, devices, and specialist services for sexual dysfunction, and included a free-text question for further comments. Analysis focussed on men who reported poor sexual function, which they considered a moderate or big problem. Descriptive statistics explored the characteristics of men offered intervention and those that found this helpful. Free-text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Outcome: the main outcome of this study was to assess access to and experience of medications, devices, and specialist services for sexual dysfunction. Results: 39.0% of all survey respondents (13,978/35,823) reported poor sexual function, which they considered a moderate or big problem. 51.7% of these men were not offered any intervention to aid sexual functioning. 71.9% of those offered an intervention reported trying it, of whom 48.7% found the intervention helpful. Men treated with surgery or brachytherapy were most likely to be offered an intervention. Medication was the most commonly offered intervention and 39.3% of those who tried medication found this helpful. Although offered less often, approximately half of the men who tried devices or attended specialist services found the intervention helpful. Free-text responses indicated that barriers to accessing support included inadequate information and support from healthcare professionals, embarrassment, negative views about treatment options, concerns about side effects and safety, and inconsistencies between secondary and primary care. Barriers to continuing use included limited effectiveness of treatments, inadequate ongoing support, and funding constraints. Drivers of sexual recovery included patient proactivity and persistence with trying different treatment options and ongoing support from health professionals. Clinical Implications: There is an urgent need to ensure that all men are offered, and have equal access to, sexual care support, with referral to specialist services when required. Strengths & Limitations: This study presents data from a large, U.K.-wide, population-based study of men with PCa and includes quantitative and qualitative findings. The possibility of non-response bias should, however, be considered. Conclusion: There are significant shortcomings in the support offered to U.K. men with sexual dysfunction following diagnosis and treatment for PCa which need to be addressed. E Watson, S Wilding, L Matheson, et al. Experiences of Support for Sexual Dysfunction in Men With Prostate Cancer: Findings From a U.K.-Wide Mixed Methods Study. J Sex Med 2021;XX:XXX–XXX.
Text
Experiences of support for sexual dysfunction in men with prostate cancer findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 28 December 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 February 2021
Published date: 1 March 2021
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
Funding: The Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis study was funded by the Movember Foundation, in partnership with Prostate Cancer UK, as part of the Prostate Cancer Outcomes programme (grant number B026/MO). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis amd interpretation of results, or writing the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Free Text, LAPCD, Prostate Cancer, Sexual Aids, Sexual Dysfunction, Supportive Care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 448441
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/448441
ISSN: 1743-6095
PURE UUID: 1dbc2a62-04d0-4fb8-a4af-e5b4d4cd88b2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Apr 2021 16:45
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Eila Watson
Author:
Sarah Wilding
Author:
Lauren Matheson
Author:
Jo Brett
Author:
Eilis McCaughan
Author:
Amy Downing
Author:
William Cross
Author:
Peter Selby
Author:
Hugh Butcher
Author:
Adam Glaser
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics