The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A retrospective cohort study comparing a novel, spherical, resorbable particle against five established embolic agents for uterine fibroid embolisation

A retrospective cohort study comparing a novel, spherical, resorbable particle against five established embolic agents for uterine fibroid embolisation
A retrospective cohort study comparing a novel, spherical, resorbable particle against five established embolic agents for uterine fibroid embolisation

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, resorbable, spherical embolic agent compared with other established agents, by studying percentage fibroid infarction (the best indicator of long-term symptom improvement) in patients undergoing uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined six different embolic agents used for fibroid embolisation, including a new gelatin-based, fully resorbable, spherical agent. The primary effectiveness outcomes were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined dominant fibroid infarct percentage (DF%) and all fibroid percentage infarct (AF%) at 3 months post-embolisation. MRI-determined uterine artery patency rate was the secondary outcome. Chi-squared test (χ 2), relative risk (RR) calculation (primary outcomes), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (secondary outcome) were the statistical tests employed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were treated with six embolic agents (20 consecutive patients per group, overall mean age 44.8±6.4, initial uterine volume 570±472 ml, dominant fibroid volume 249±324 ml). Fibroid infarctrates were similar between the cohorts with no significant difference between the new gelatin-based resorbable particle and other embolics in either DF% (χ 2=3.92, p=0.56) or AF% (χ 2=2.83, p=0.73). Complete DF% RR=1.07 (0.90–1.27) and AF% RR=1.09 (0.85–1.41) suggest non-inferiority of the resorbable particle (d=0.67, p<0.05). A favourable uterine artery patency rate was demonstrated for the resorbable particle compared with gelatin slurry (82.5% versus 27.5%, p<0.001 after Bonferroni adjustment). CONCLUSIONS: This new gelatin-based, fully resorbable particle is an effective embolic agent for fibroid embolisation and achieves an infarct rate non-inferior to established embolics.

0009-9260
452-457
Maclean, D
3f429b47-ac02-4568-af31-6b9d5927371a
Vigneswaran, Ganesh
4e3865ad-1a15-4a27-b810-55348e7baceb
Bryant, Timothy
05bd12ef-e864-450e-96f5-addcc60c173d
Modi, Sachin
caef086a-dda5-418a-ada8-fc042e6e0b18
Hacking, N
b6287f0b-1b80-49a6-a01a-f52f9da671c8
Maclean, D
3f429b47-ac02-4568-af31-6b9d5927371a
Vigneswaran, Ganesh
4e3865ad-1a15-4a27-b810-55348e7baceb
Bryant, Timothy
05bd12ef-e864-450e-96f5-addcc60c173d
Modi, Sachin
caef086a-dda5-418a-ada8-fc042e6e0b18
Hacking, N
b6287f0b-1b80-49a6-a01a-f52f9da671c8

Maclean, D, Vigneswaran, Ganesh, Bryant, Timothy, Modi, Sachin and Hacking, N (2021) A retrospective cohort study comparing a novel, spherical, resorbable particle against five established embolic agents for uterine fibroid embolisation. Clinical Radiology, 76 (6), 452-457. (doi:10.1016/j.crad.2021.01.012).

Record type: Article

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, resorbable, spherical embolic agent compared with other established agents, by studying percentage fibroid infarction (the best indicator of long-term symptom improvement) in patients undergoing uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined six different embolic agents used for fibroid embolisation, including a new gelatin-based, fully resorbable, spherical agent. The primary effectiveness outcomes were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined dominant fibroid infarct percentage (DF%) and all fibroid percentage infarct (AF%) at 3 months post-embolisation. MRI-determined uterine artery patency rate was the secondary outcome. Chi-squared test (χ 2), relative risk (RR) calculation (primary outcomes), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (secondary outcome) were the statistical tests employed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were treated with six embolic agents (20 consecutive patients per group, overall mean age 44.8±6.4, initial uterine volume 570±472 ml, dominant fibroid volume 249±324 ml). Fibroid infarctrates were similar between the cohorts with no significant difference between the new gelatin-based resorbable particle and other embolics in either DF% (χ 2=3.92, p=0.56) or AF% (χ 2=2.83, p=0.73). Complete DF% RR=1.07 (0.90–1.27) and AF% RR=1.09 (0.85–1.41) suggest non-inferiority of the resorbable particle (d=0.67, p<0.05). A favourable uterine artery patency rate was demonstrated for the resorbable particle compared with gelatin slurry (82.5% versus 27.5%, p<0.001 after Bonferroni adjustment). CONCLUSIONS: This new gelatin-based, fully resorbable particle is an effective embolic agent for fibroid embolisation and achieves an infarct rate non-inferior to established embolics.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 January 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 February 2021
Published date: 1 June 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 448757
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/448757
ISSN: 0009-9260
PURE UUID: c5057915-f488-43b4-85be-85be006665de
ORCID for Ganesh Vigneswaran: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4115-428X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 May 2021 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D Maclean
Author: Timothy Bryant
Author: Sachin Modi
Author: N Hacking

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×