The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised, controlled trials of medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised, controlled trials of medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised, controlled trials of medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The nature and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses to ADHD medications and the extent to which response to active medications and placebo are inter-correlated is unclear. To assess the magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses to ADHD and their association with active treatment response. We searched literature until June 26, 2019, for published/unpublished double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medication. Authors were contacted for additional data. We assessed placebo effects on efficacy and nocebo effects on tolerability using random effects meta-analysis. We assessed the association of study design and patient features with placebo/nocebo response. We analysed 128 RCTs (10,578 children/adolescents and 9175 adults) and found significant and heterogenous placebo effects for all efficacy outcomes, with no publication bias. The placebo effect was greatest for clinician compared with other raters. We found nocebo effects on tolerability outcomes. Efficacy outcomes from most raters showed significant positive correlations between the baseline to endpoint placebo effects and the baseline to endpoint drug effects. Placebo and nocebo effects did not differ among drugs. Baseline severity and type of rating scale influenced the findings. Shared non-specific factors influence response to both placebo and active medication. Although ADHD medications are superior to placebo, and placebo treatment in clinical practice is not feasible, clinicians should attempt to incorporate factors associated with placebo effects into clinical care. Future studies should explore how such effects influence response to medication treatment. Upon publication, data will be available in Mendeley Data: PROSPERO (CRD42019130292).

1359-4184
Faraone, Stephen
cb2b3165-7bc0-4898-9acc-3eb9fe9d457f
Newcorn, Jeffrey
f94e144e-5f6e-4146-8e36-b9628d89a3d1
Cipriani, Andrea
5d49a3e7-6b11-4abd-b740-bcdbc9e9ea11
Brandeis, Daniel
a59f6c96-4663-4a54-893a-692f740e8160
Kaiser, Anna
52e42170-4bfc-42b9-ad37-4fe1cfce9a42
Hohmann, Sarah
6290e565-fd6d-43db-ae47-b0edbcb9bf39
Haege, Alexander
6ea7fe54-2883-478c-bc0d-0c73d06a16fe
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Faraone, Stephen
cb2b3165-7bc0-4898-9acc-3eb9fe9d457f
Newcorn, Jeffrey
f94e144e-5f6e-4146-8e36-b9628d89a3d1
Cipriani, Andrea
5d49a3e7-6b11-4abd-b740-bcdbc9e9ea11
Brandeis, Daniel
a59f6c96-4663-4a54-893a-692f740e8160
Kaiser, Anna
52e42170-4bfc-42b9-ad37-4fe1cfce9a42
Hohmann, Sarah
6290e565-fd6d-43db-ae47-b0edbcb9bf39
Haege, Alexander
6ea7fe54-2883-478c-bc0d-0c73d06a16fe
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb

Faraone, Stephen, Newcorn, Jeffrey, Cipriani, Andrea, Brandeis, Daniel, Kaiser, Anna, Hohmann, Sarah, Haege, Alexander and Cortese, Samuele (2021) Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised, controlled trials of medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry. (doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01134-w).

Record type: Review

Abstract

The nature and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses to ADHD medications and the extent to which response to active medications and placebo are inter-correlated is unclear. To assess the magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses to ADHD and their association with active treatment response. We searched literature until June 26, 2019, for published/unpublished double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medication. Authors were contacted for additional data. We assessed placebo effects on efficacy and nocebo effects on tolerability using random effects meta-analysis. We assessed the association of study design and patient features with placebo/nocebo response. We analysed 128 RCTs (10,578 children/adolescents and 9175 adults) and found significant and heterogenous placebo effects for all efficacy outcomes, with no publication bias. The placebo effect was greatest for clinician compared with other raters. We found nocebo effects on tolerability outcomes. Efficacy outcomes from most raters showed significant positive correlations between the baseline to endpoint placebo effects and the baseline to endpoint drug effects. Placebo and nocebo effects did not differ among drugs. Baseline severity and type of rating scale influenced the findings. Shared non-specific factors influence response to both placebo and active medication. Although ADHD medications are superior to placebo, and placebo treatment in clinical practice is not feasible, clinicians should attempt to incorporate factors associated with placebo effects into clinical care. Future studies should explore how such effects influence response to medication treatment. Upon publication, data will be available in Mendeley Data: PROSPERO (CRD42019130292).

Text
210226 Placebo Meta Analysis - Accepted Manuscript
Download (102kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 April 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 May 2021
Additional Information: Acknowledgements We thank the European ADHD Guidelines group (EAGG) for creating the publicly available data used in this manuscript. Dr. Faraone is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 667302 and 965381; NIMH grants U01MH109536-01, U01AR076092-01A1, R0MH116037 and 5R01AG06495502. Dr Cipriani is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Cognitive Health Clinical Research Facility, by an NIHR Research Professorship (grant RP-2017–08-ST2–006), by the NIHR Oxford and Thames Valley Applied Research Collaboration and by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (grant BRC-1215–20005). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 449098
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449098
ISSN: 1359-4184
PURE UUID: 4a146387-699c-48d1-860b-44a6e42e1174
ORCID for Samuele Cortese: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-8075

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Jun 2021 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Stephen Faraone
Author: Jeffrey Newcorn
Author: Andrea Cipriani
Author: Daniel Brandeis
Author: Anna Kaiser
Author: Sarah Hohmann
Author: Alexander Haege
Author: Samuele Cortese ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×