The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: survival analysis using visual and computer-based computed tomography assessment

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: survival analysis using visual and computer-based computed tomography assessment
Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: survival analysis using visual and computer-based computed tomography assessment

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) are known to have poor outcomes but detailed examinations of prognostic significance of an association between these morphologic processes are lacking. Methods: Retrospective observational study of independent derivation and validation cohorts of IPF populations. Upper-lobe PPFE extent was scored visually (vPPFE) as categories of absent, moderate, marked. Computerised upper-zone PPFE extent (cPPFE) was examined continuously and using a threshold of 2·5% pleural surface area. vPPFE and cPPFE were evaluated against 1-year FVC decline (estimated using mixed-effects models) and mortality. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, smoking history, antifibrotic treatment and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide. Findings: PPFE prevalence was 49% (derivation cohort, n = 142) and 72% (validation cohort, n = 145). vPPFE marginally contributed 3–14% to variance in interstitial lung disease (ILD) severity across both cohorts. In multivariable models, marked vPPFE was independently associated with 1-year FVC decline (derivation: regression coefficient 18·3, 95 CI 8·47–28·2%; validation: 7·51, 1·85–13·2%) and mortality (derivation: hazard ratio [HR] 7·70, 95% CI 3·50–16·9; validation: HR 3·01, 1·33–6·81). Similarly, continuous and dichotomised cPPFE were associated with 1-year FVC decline and mortality (cPPFE ≥ 2·5% derivation: HR 5·26, 3·00–9·22; validation: HR 2·06, 1·28–3·31). Individuals with cPPFE ≥ 2·5% or marked vPPFE had the lowest median survival, the cPPFE threshold demonstrated greater discrimination of poor outcomes at two and three years than marked vPPFE. Interpretation: PPFE quantification supports distinction of IPF patients with a worse outcome independent of established ILD severity measures. This has the potential to improve prognostic management and elucidate separate pathways of disease progression. Funding: This research was funded in whole or in part by the Wellcome Trust [209,553/Z/17/Z] and the NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, UK.

Computed tomography, IPF, PPFE, Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, Quantitative analysis
Gudmundsson, Eyjolfur
9c6805d8-0f33-4872-a99f-44f0fbf19bf7
Zhao, An
ef4fafd7-56c5-4295-a5ac-fe3e27dd9196
Mogulkoc, Nesrin
12f4872b-cf4f-47a0-bb28-dca4c97c0245
Stewart, Iain
e2ffcbf9-b394-4101-a0dd-8bc026e60fcb
Jones, Mark
a6fd492e-058e-4e84-a486-34c6035429c1
van Moorsel, Coline
b1488e48-faa0-4231-8a9f-da849a007a43
Savas, Recep
5441e82d-7aa2-499d-9a0a-82e1921eeb76
Wells, Athol
f462391e-69cd-48f9-86ad-83ac7b868a2a
Janes, Sam
e62ede57-1e67-468b-8a48-e17b014f04de
Alexander, Daniel
1428c2b2-2b9f-4a74-8dd4-7500704745c5
Jacob, Joseph
de510fa4-f11f-4dbe-9371-5f2e965598a9
Gudmundsson, Eyjolfur
9c6805d8-0f33-4872-a99f-44f0fbf19bf7
Zhao, An
ef4fafd7-56c5-4295-a5ac-fe3e27dd9196
Mogulkoc, Nesrin
12f4872b-cf4f-47a0-bb28-dca4c97c0245
Stewart, Iain
e2ffcbf9-b394-4101-a0dd-8bc026e60fcb
Jones, Mark
a6fd492e-058e-4e84-a486-34c6035429c1
van Moorsel, Coline
b1488e48-faa0-4231-8a9f-da849a007a43
Savas, Recep
5441e82d-7aa2-499d-9a0a-82e1921eeb76
Wells, Athol
f462391e-69cd-48f9-86ad-83ac7b868a2a
Janes, Sam
e62ede57-1e67-468b-8a48-e17b014f04de
Alexander, Daniel
1428c2b2-2b9f-4a74-8dd4-7500704745c5
Jacob, Joseph
de510fa4-f11f-4dbe-9371-5f2e965598a9

Gudmundsson, Eyjolfur, Zhao, An, Mogulkoc, Nesrin, Stewart, Iain, Jones, Mark, van Moorsel, Coline, Savas, Recep, Wells, Athol, Janes, Sam, Alexander, Daniel and Jacob, Joseph (2021) Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: survival analysis using visual and computer-based computed tomography assessment. EClinicalMedicine, [101009]. (doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101009).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) are known to have poor outcomes but detailed examinations of prognostic significance of an association between these morphologic processes are lacking. Methods: Retrospective observational study of independent derivation and validation cohorts of IPF populations. Upper-lobe PPFE extent was scored visually (vPPFE) as categories of absent, moderate, marked. Computerised upper-zone PPFE extent (cPPFE) was examined continuously and using a threshold of 2·5% pleural surface area. vPPFE and cPPFE were evaluated against 1-year FVC decline (estimated using mixed-effects models) and mortality. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, smoking history, antifibrotic treatment and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide. Findings: PPFE prevalence was 49% (derivation cohort, n = 142) and 72% (validation cohort, n = 145). vPPFE marginally contributed 3–14% to variance in interstitial lung disease (ILD) severity across both cohorts. In multivariable models, marked vPPFE was independently associated with 1-year FVC decline (derivation: regression coefficient 18·3, 95 CI 8·47–28·2%; validation: 7·51, 1·85–13·2%) and mortality (derivation: hazard ratio [HR] 7·70, 95% CI 3·50–16·9; validation: HR 3·01, 1·33–6·81). Similarly, continuous and dichotomised cPPFE were associated with 1-year FVC decline and mortality (cPPFE ≥ 2·5% derivation: HR 5·26, 3·00–9·22; validation: HR 2·06, 1·28–3·31). Individuals with cPPFE ≥ 2·5% or marked vPPFE had the lowest median survival, the cPPFE threshold demonstrated greater discrimination of poor outcomes at two and three years than marked vPPFE. Interpretation: PPFE quantification supports distinction of IPF patients with a worse outcome independent of established ILD severity measures. This has the potential to improve prognostic management and elucidate separate pathways of disease progression. Funding: This research was funded in whole or in part by the Wellcome Trust [209,553/Z/17/Z] and the NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, UK.

Text
PPFE_in_IPF_2021_Revision_EClinMed_clean_JJ_EG - Accepted Manuscript
Download (5MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 June 2021
Published date: August 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This research was funded in whole or in part by the Wellcome Trust [209553/Z/17/Z]. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. This project, JJ, EG and SMJ were also supported by the NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, UK. MGJ and CB acknowledge the support of the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre. EPSRC grant EP/M020533/1 helped support this work. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Keywords: Computed tomography, IPF, PPFE, Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, Quantitative analysis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 449789
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449789
PURE UUID: 5cb3cc5f-3e57-4e73-b342-b4e94e119306
ORCID for Mark Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-6014

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jun 2021 16:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eyjolfur Gudmundsson
Author: An Zhao
Author: Nesrin Mogulkoc
Author: Iain Stewart
Author: Mark Jones ORCID iD
Author: Coline van Moorsel
Author: Recep Savas
Author: Athol Wells
Author: Sam Janes
Author: Daniel Alexander
Author: Joseph Jacob

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×