Regional carbon stock assessment and the potential effects of land cover change
Regional carbon stock assessment and the potential effects of land cover change
Accurate assessment of carbon stocks remains a global challenge. High levels of uncertainty in Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry reporting has hindered decision-makers and investors worldwide to support sustainable soil and vegetation management. Potential mitigation-driven activities and effects are likely to be locally/regionally unique. A spatially-targeted approach is thus required to optimise strategic carbon management. This study provides a new regional carbon assessment (tier 3) approach using biophysical-process modelling of high-resolution Land Cover (LC) data within a UK National Park (NFNP) to provide higher accuracy. Future Land Cover Change (LCC) scenarios were simulated. Vegetation-driven carbon dynamics were modelled by coupling two widely-used models, LPJ-GUESS and RothC-26.3. Transition and persistence analysis was conducted using Terrset's Land Change Modeller to predict likely future LCC for 2040 using Multi-Layer Perceptron Markov-Chain Analysis. Current total carbon in the NFNP is 7.32–8.73 Mt C, with current trajectories of LCC leading to minor losses of up to 0.39 Mt C. Alternative LCC scenarios indicated possible gains or losses of 1.27 Mt C, or 136.7 t C ha−1. The importance of vegetation-driven carbon storage was greater than the national average, with a VegC pool 12–14% of the soil organic C pool, placing greater significance on local/regional LC and management policy. The potential storage capacity of each LC class was ranked (highest to lowest): Coniferous > Broadleaved/Mixed > Coastal > Semi-natural Grassland > Heath > Improved Grassland > Arable (Cropland). Opportunities were prioritised to inform landscape-scale management to reduce future carbon losses and/or to enhance gains through LCC. Balancing the carbon budget relies upon maintaining existing LC. The more detailed LC classification facilitated accounting of management through stock change factors and disaggregation of classes, achieving greater detail and accuracy. Forthcoming policy decisions must optimise carbon storage at a local/regional landscape-scale.
Carbon budget, Land use, land cover change, land use change and forestry (LUCF), soil organic carbon, terrestrial
Fryer, James
dba660fa-9056-4548-beea-e5c2aa48a24c
Williams, Ian
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
25 June 2021
Fryer, James
dba660fa-9056-4548-beea-e5c2aa48a24c
Williams, Ian
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Fryer, James and Williams, Ian
(2021)
Regional carbon stock assessment and the potential effects of land cover change.
Science of the Total Environment, 775, [145815].
(doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145815).
Abstract
Accurate assessment of carbon stocks remains a global challenge. High levels of uncertainty in Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry reporting has hindered decision-makers and investors worldwide to support sustainable soil and vegetation management. Potential mitigation-driven activities and effects are likely to be locally/regionally unique. A spatially-targeted approach is thus required to optimise strategic carbon management. This study provides a new regional carbon assessment (tier 3) approach using biophysical-process modelling of high-resolution Land Cover (LC) data within a UK National Park (NFNP) to provide higher accuracy. Future Land Cover Change (LCC) scenarios were simulated. Vegetation-driven carbon dynamics were modelled by coupling two widely-used models, LPJ-GUESS and RothC-26.3. Transition and persistence analysis was conducted using Terrset's Land Change Modeller to predict likely future LCC for 2040 using Multi-Layer Perceptron Markov-Chain Analysis. Current total carbon in the NFNP is 7.32–8.73 Mt C, with current trajectories of LCC leading to minor losses of up to 0.39 Mt C. Alternative LCC scenarios indicated possible gains or losses of 1.27 Mt C, or 136.7 t C ha−1. The importance of vegetation-driven carbon storage was greater than the national average, with a VegC pool 12–14% of the soil organic C pool, placing greater significance on local/regional LC and management policy. The potential storage capacity of each LC class was ranked (highest to lowest): Coniferous > Broadleaved/Mixed > Coastal > Semi-natural Grassland > Heath > Improved Grassland > Arable (Cropland). Opportunities were prioritised to inform landscape-scale management to reduce future carbon losses and/or to enhance gains through LCC. Balancing the carbon budget relies upon maintaining existing LC. The more detailed LC classification facilitated accounting of management through stock change factors and disaggregation of classes, achieving greater detail and accuracy. Forthcoming policy decisions must optimise carbon storage at a local/regional landscape-scale.
Text
Fryer-StoTen-ReSub
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 8 February 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 February 2021
Published date: 25 June 2021
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Jonathan Coello and Danika Hawson, previously of the University of Southampton, for assistance in creating a version of the RothC-26.3 model in Microsoft Excel. Further thanks go to Dr. Johan Nord at the University of Lund for providing the source code and guidance to run LPJ-GUESS.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Carbon budget, Land use, land cover change, land use change and forestry (LUCF), soil organic carbon, terrestrial
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 450067
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450067
ISSN: 0048-9697
PURE UUID: af4575a3-0aac-4c16-9059-3a737f5f21d6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jul 2021 16:32
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 04:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
James Fryer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
