The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An experimental approach to understanding Aurignacian projectile technology in NW Europe

An experimental approach to understanding Aurignacian projectile technology in NW Europe
An experimental approach to understanding Aurignacian projectile technology in NW Europe
Understanding the challenges and trials faced by early Upper Palaeolithic people in north-west Europe has been an avenue of investigation since the earliest archaeological research of this time period. In the decades since, huge amounts of time and effort have been invested in studying the lithic and osseous tools found in caves, rock shelters and rare open-air sites. However, this time and effort has almost exclusively been focussed on understanding the objects that have stood the test of time, with little consideration of the components that may have once been attached to these surviving objects. The components that no longer survive are at least as important as the surviving parts. They can offer different insights into the challenges faced by the first modern humans in Europe which can give indications of the likely hunting or movement strategies of these early groups. Limited experimental study has shown that the osseous points of the Aurignacian (c. 44-31 ka cal BP) are almost certainly spear points and that they were effective at causing wounds to Pleistocene herbivores. However, like much past literature, the focus has been on the spear tips rather than the whole of the spear.
This thesis changes tack from previous research in that it gives the limelight to the other components and materials that would have made an Aurignacian spear. It also investigates the possible reasoning for the manufacture and form of the spear tips, but with a view on the relationship with the other parts. Key questions will look at the role other Aurignacian tools played in the production of spears and if glues or mastics were required. Whether the spear tips were over-engineered or whether they were carefully designed to improve the longevity of more valuable components (such as the spear shaft). If resource management can be identified based on simulated plant biomes of Europe during Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 and organic samples from around Europe, and what it tells us about sources of viable spear shafts. How these spears may have performed is tested using semi-controlled throwing experiments at a sports field, and in a drop tower, with a focus on all the components of the spear. Finally, what the experimental, biome, organic sample and archaeological evidence are used to evaluate the hunting strategies of Aurignacian groups in NW Europe.
University of Southampton
Dilley, James
376fed73-e670-4444-bf8a-4db643bfde12
Dilley, James
376fed73-e670-4444-bf8a-4db643bfde12
Davies, Simon
5042ec27-3fcd-4ddb-bc0c-8c5578a0e50b
Pike, Alistair
e8603e20-0a89-4d57-a294-247b983fc857

Dilley, James (2021) An experimental approach to understanding Aurignacian projectile technology in NW Europe. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 180pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Understanding the challenges and trials faced by early Upper Palaeolithic people in north-west Europe has been an avenue of investigation since the earliest archaeological research of this time period. In the decades since, huge amounts of time and effort have been invested in studying the lithic and osseous tools found in caves, rock shelters and rare open-air sites. However, this time and effort has almost exclusively been focussed on understanding the objects that have stood the test of time, with little consideration of the components that may have once been attached to these surviving objects. The components that no longer survive are at least as important as the surviving parts. They can offer different insights into the challenges faced by the first modern humans in Europe which can give indications of the likely hunting or movement strategies of these early groups. Limited experimental study has shown that the osseous points of the Aurignacian (c. 44-31 ka cal BP) are almost certainly spear points and that they were effective at causing wounds to Pleistocene herbivores. However, like much past literature, the focus has been on the spear tips rather than the whole of the spear.
This thesis changes tack from previous research in that it gives the limelight to the other components and materials that would have made an Aurignacian spear. It also investigates the possible reasoning for the manufacture and form of the spear tips, but with a view on the relationship with the other parts. Key questions will look at the role other Aurignacian tools played in the production of spears and if glues or mastics were required. Whether the spear tips were over-engineered or whether they were carefully designed to improve the longevity of more valuable components (such as the spear shaft). If resource management can be identified based on simulated plant biomes of Europe during Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 and organic samples from around Europe, and what it tells us about sources of viable spear shafts. How these spears may have performed is tested using semi-controlled throwing experiments at a sports field, and in a drop tower, with a focus on all the components of the spear. Finally, what the experimental, biome, organic sample and archaeological evidence are used to evaluate the hunting strategies of Aurignacian groups in NW Europe.

Text
PhD Thesis_ James Dilley - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (9MB)
Text
Permission to deposit_No Embargo_James Dilley
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: March 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 450152
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450152
PURE UUID: af3ea7e8-b413-4119-9e2d-91851f3a4d81
ORCID for Simon Davies: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-5403
ORCID for Alistair Pike: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-8948

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jul 2021 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:30

Export record

Contributors

Author: James Dilley
Thesis advisor: Simon Davies ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Alistair Pike ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×