The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The response of common minnows, Phoxinus phoxinus, to visual cues under flowing and static water conditions

The response of common minnows, Phoxinus phoxinus, to visual cues under flowing and static water conditions
The response of common minnows, Phoxinus phoxinus, to visual cues under flowing and static water conditions

While fixed visual cues provide reliable reference points for navigation in static water, it remains unclear whether fish energetically benefit from their presence in flowing water. Furthermore, benefits of visual feedback from fixed sources may be less for group members that can gain additional information from others. Using an open-channel flume, this study investigated how the response of fish to stationary visual stimuli is influenced by flow and group membership under two treatments: vertical black and white stripes placed on (1) both side walls of the channel or (2) one side wall only compared to a control where both walls were uniform white. The responses were compared in flowing and static water, and between individuals and groups of five. Fish exhibited a positive affiliation for the visual cues, travelling more slowly and spending more time closer to the striped walls. Fish were more edge oriented under flowing conditions, presumably utilizing the lower velocities at the wall boundary to reduce energy expenditure. When only one wall presented visual cues, individual fish spent more time associated with it in flowing water, suggesting some energetic benefit in lotic conditions. This may result from a greater ability to maintain station or control position relative to a reference point and/or the use of visual stimuli as a proxy indicator of physical structure which may provide drag-reducing refuge. A lesser association with the striped wall in static water suggests that visual cues provide other nonhydrodynamic benefits, such as physical refuge from predators or opportunities for crypsis. Conversely, less association of shoals with the striped walls may reflect a greater dependence on information provided by conspecifics or increased security associated with being part of a group. This study indicates that fixed visual cues likely provide several benefits that vary depending on flow and group membership.

collective behaviour, environmental stimulus, fish, group behaviour, optic flow
0003-3472
289-296
Miles, James
993242b0-5784-4d76-825a-b757dffd9ac1
Vowles, Andrew
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7
Miles, James
993242b0-5784-4d76-825a-b757dffd9ac1
Vowles, Andrew
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7

Miles, James, Vowles, Andrew and Kemp, Paul (2021) The response of common minnows, Phoxinus phoxinus, to visual cues under flowing and static water conditions. Animal Behaviour, 179, 289-296, [21-00054]. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.07.004).

Record type: Article

Abstract

While fixed visual cues provide reliable reference points for navigation in static water, it remains unclear whether fish energetically benefit from their presence in flowing water. Furthermore, benefits of visual feedback from fixed sources may be less for group members that can gain additional information from others. Using an open-channel flume, this study investigated how the response of fish to stationary visual stimuli is influenced by flow and group membership under two treatments: vertical black and white stripes placed on (1) both side walls of the channel or (2) one side wall only compared to a control where both walls were uniform white. The responses were compared in flowing and static water, and between individuals and groups of five. Fish exhibited a positive affiliation for the visual cues, travelling more slowly and spending more time closer to the striped walls. Fish were more edge oriented under flowing conditions, presumably utilizing the lower velocities at the wall boundary to reduce energy expenditure. When only one wall presented visual cues, individual fish spent more time associated with it in flowing water, suggesting some energetic benefit in lotic conditions. This may result from a greater ability to maintain station or control position relative to a reference point and/or the use of visual stimuli as a proxy indicator of physical structure which may provide drag-reducing refuge. A lesser association with the striped wall in static water suggests that visual cues provide other nonhydrodynamic benefits, such as physical refuge from predators or opportunities for crypsis. Conversely, less association of shoals with the striped walls may reflect a greater dependence on information provided by conspecifics or increased security associated with being part of a group. This study indicates that fixed visual cues likely provide several benefits that vary depending on flow and group membership.

Text
Miles et al. Non-highlighted revised manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (74kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 May 2021
Published date: September 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council ( NERC ) as part of a NERC studentship [grant number 1786331 ]. We thank Toru Tsuzaki and members of the ICER team for their assistance and technical advice. Publisher Copyright: © 2021
Keywords: collective behaviour, environmental stimulus, fish, group behaviour, optic flow

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 450220
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450220
ISSN: 0003-3472
PURE UUID: 24b644e4-d868-4cbf-bd1b-8578b442ce03
ORCID for James Miles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-6343
ORCID for Andrew Vowles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-5938
ORCID for Paul Kemp: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-0589

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jul 2021 16:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×