The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Resources in women's social networks for food shopping are more strongly associated with better dietary quality than people: a cross-sectional study.

Resources in women's social networks for food shopping are more strongly associated with better dietary quality than people: a cross-sectional study.
Resources in women's social networks for food shopping are more strongly associated with better dietary quality than people: a cross-sectional study.

When healthy people are part of an individual's social network, those individuals will have better dietary quality. Little, however, is known about whether social networks for food shopping, including both people and resources (e.g. recipes, weight loss programmes and food advertisements) are associated with dietary quality. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between social networks for food shopping and dietary quality, and whether this differs for people and resources, among women aged 18–45 years. A total of 129 participants completed a cross-sectional questionnaire including an ego-centric Social Network Exposure tool and short Food Frequency Questionnaire. Associations between dietary quality and type of network member, perceived healthiness and support for healthy shopping choices were explored using linear regression models. Analyses revealed that participants who nominated people in their food shopping social network that eat healthily or support healthy food shopping had better dietary quality (β = 0.16 SD per 1-point change on a 4-point scale, 95%CI -0.06, 0.39; β = 0.20, 95%CI -0.07, 0.46, respectively). Resources in participants' food shopping social networks which promote healthy eating or support healthy shopping were associated with better dietary quality. These associations remained robust after adjustment for confounding variables identified using a directed acyclic graph (β = 0.31 SD per 1-point change on a 4-point scale, 95%CI 0.03, 0.58; β = 0.44, 95%CI 0.09, 0.79 respectively). The results were strengthened when the outcome was multiplied by frequency of contact (β = 0.33, 95%CI 0.05, 0.61; β = 0.47, 95%CI 0.11, 0.83 respectively). This study suggests that resources which promote healthy eating and healthy food shopping have a stronger association with dietary quality than social support from people. Further research is required in a larger sample, including multiple time-points, to confirm these findings.

Diet, Egocentric, Food shopping, Social networks, Women
0277-9536
Shand, Calum J
0074f6da-d9e1-42b3-960c-11decd638884
Crozier, Sarah
9c3595ce-45b0-44fa-8c4c-4c555e628a03
Vassilev, Ivaylo
d76a5531-4ddc-4eb2-909b-a2a1068f05f3
Penn-newman, Daniel J
7be13c0e-0019-41c1-b2c9-c82a3b11cd48
Dhuria, Preeti
470c09bf-2b4d-4db6-9100-a6878b4d4d32
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Baird, Janis
f4bf2039-6118-436f-ab69-df8b4d17f824
Vogel, Christina
768f1dcd-2697-4aae-95cc-ee2f6d63dff5
Shand, Calum J
0074f6da-d9e1-42b3-960c-11decd638884
Crozier, Sarah
9c3595ce-45b0-44fa-8c4c-4c555e628a03
Vassilev, Ivaylo
d76a5531-4ddc-4eb2-909b-a2a1068f05f3
Penn-newman, Daniel J
7be13c0e-0019-41c1-b2c9-c82a3b11cd48
Dhuria, Preeti
470c09bf-2b4d-4db6-9100-a6878b4d4d32
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Baird, Janis
f4bf2039-6118-436f-ab69-df8b4d17f824
Vogel, Christina
768f1dcd-2697-4aae-95cc-ee2f6d63dff5

Shand, Calum J, Crozier, Sarah, Vassilev, Ivaylo, Penn-newman, Daniel J, Dhuria, Preeti, Cooper, Cyrus, Rogers, Anne, Baird, Janis and Vogel, Christina (2021) Resources in women's social networks for food shopping are more strongly associated with better dietary quality than people: a cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 284, [114228]. (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114228).

Record type: Article

Abstract

When healthy people are part of an individual's social network, those individuals will have better dietary quality. Little, however, is known about whether social networks for food shopping, including both people and resources (e.g. recipes, weight loss programmes and food advertisements) are associated with dietary quality. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between social networks for food shopping and dietary quality, and whether this differs for people and resources, among women aged 18–45 years. A total of 129 participants completed a cross-sectional questionnaire including an ego-centric Social Network Exposure tool and short Food Frequency Questionnaire. Associations between dietary quality and type of network member, perceived healthiness and support for healthy shopping choices were explored using linear regression models. Analyses revealed that participants who nominated people in their food shopping social network that eat healthily or support healthy food shopping had better dietary quality (β = 0.16 SD per 1-point change on a 4-point scale, 95%CI -0.06, 0.39; β = 0.20, 95%CI -0.07, 0.46, respectively). Resources in participants' food shopping social networks which promote healthy eating or support healthy shopping were associated with better dietary quality. These associations remained robust after adjustment for confounding variables identified using a directed acyclic graph (β = 0.31 SD per 1-point change on a 4-point scale, 95%CI 0.03, 0.58; β = 0.44, 95%CI 0.09, 0.79 respectively). The results were strengthened when the outcome was multiplied by frequency of contact (β = 0.33, 95%CI 0.05, 0.61; β = 0.47, 95%CI 0.11, 0.83 respectively). This study suggests that resources which promote healthy eating and healthy food shopping have a stronger association with dietary quality than social support from people. Further research is required in a larger sample, including multiple time-points, to confirm these findings.

Text
SSM Manuscript 2021_revision2.0_clean_PURE - Accepted Manuscript
Download (83kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 July 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 July 2021
Published date: September 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This research and the authors of this paper are supported by the following funding sources: The Academy of Medical Sciences and Wellcome Trust (grant funding, HOP001\1067 ), (grant funding, RMC1516-12 ; fellowship to support CV , University of Southampton PCTA36/2015 ), National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (grant: NBRC RS4h) , Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research CLAHRC Wessex . Publisher Copyright: © 2021
Keywords: Diet, Egocentric, Food shopping, Social networks, Women

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 450715
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450715
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: 627b4140-7e16-46f7-bed0-20c6971156f7
ORCID for Sarah Crozier: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-1127
ORCID for Ivaylo Vassilev: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-8247
ORCID for Preeti Dhuria: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-4424
ORCID for Cyrus Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
ORCID for Janis Baird: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-4361
ORCID for Christina Vogel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-3786

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Aug 2021 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 05:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Calum J Shand
Author: Sarah Crozier ORCID iD
Author: Ivaylo Vassilev ORCID iD
Author: Daniel J Penn-newman
Author: Preeti Dhuria ORCID iD
Author: Cyrus Cooper ORCID iD
Author: Anne Rogers
Author: Janis Baird ORCID iD
Author: Christina Vogel ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×