The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Attitudes to ageing, biomarkers of ageing and mortality: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936

Attitudes to ageing, biomarkers of ageing and mortality: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936
Attitudes to ageing, biomarkers of ageing and mortality: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936
Objective: To investigate whether people with more positive attitudes to ageing are biologically younger as defined by leucocyte telomere length, accelerated DNA methylation GrimAge (AgeAccelGrim) and brain-predicted age difference, and whether these biomarkers explain relationships between attitudes to ageing and mortality.

Methods: We used linear regression to examine cross-sectionally attitudes to ageing (measured using the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire) and the three biomarkers in 758 adults, mean age 72.5 years, from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine longitudinally attitudes to ageing and mortality and the role of the biomarkers.

Results: More positive attitude to physical change was associated with younger biological age, as measured by AgeAccelGrim and brain-predicted age difference in age-adjusted and sex-adjusted models: for an SD higher score, AgeAccelGrim was lower by -0.73 (95% CI -1.03 to -0.42) of a year, and brain-predicted age difference was lower by -0.87 (1.51 to 0.23) of a year. Both associations were attenuated by adjustment for covariates and not significant after simultaneous adjustment for all covariates and correction for multiple testing. More positive attitudes to physical change were associated with lower mortality: for an SD higher score the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HR (95% CI) was 0.66 (0.56 to 0.78). Adjustment for AgeAccelGrim or brain-predicted age difference attenuated this association slightly. It remained significant after adjustment for all covariates.

Conclusion: We found partial evidence that attitudes to ageing are linked with ageing biomarkers but they accounted for only a little of the association between attitudes and mortality.
0143-005X
McLachlan, Kyle J.J.
2a63f964-a5c5-4eb3-b7ba-d1942fd7f00f
Cole, James H.
1b217cf8-48ac-4bb2-94be-82c62c41ff52
Harris, Sarah E.
925adc32-c478-44a2-84c0-1c7eefa8dfc8
Marioni, Riccardo E.
dd8c1d6f-c3ed-464a-8c41-50bc9b1a0aad
Deary, Ian J.
027158ae-fbfb-40ea-98b1-32d2690499ac
Gale, Catharine
5bb2abb3-7b53-42d6-8aa7-817e193140c8
McLachlan, Kyle J.J.
2a63f964-a5c5-4eb3-b7ba-d1942fd7f00f
Cole, James H.
1b217cf8-48ac-4bb2-94be-82c62c41ff52
Harris, Sarah E.
925adc32-c478-44a2-84c0-1c7eefa8dfc8
Marioni, Riccardo E.
dd8c1d6f-c3ed-464a-8c41-50bc9b1a0aad
Deary, Ian J.
027158ae-fbfb-40ea-98b1-32d2690499ac
Gale, Catharine
5bb2abb3-7b53-42d6-8aa7-817e193140c8

McLachlan, Kyle J.J., Cole, James H., Harris, Sarah E., Marioni, Riccardo E., Deary, Ian J. and Gale, Catharine (2020) Attitudes to ageing, biomarkers of ageing and mortality: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. (doi:10.1136/jech-2019-213462).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether people with more positive attitudes to ageing are biologically younger as defined by leucocyte telomere length, accelerated DNA methylation GrimAge (AgeAccelGrim) and brain-predicted age difference, and whether these biomarkers explain relationships between attitudes to ageing and mortality.

Methods: We used linear regression to examine cross-sectionally attitudes to ageing (measured using the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire) and the three biomarkers in 758 adults, mean age 72.5 years, from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine longitudinally attitudes to ageing and mortality and the role of the biomarkers.

Results: More positive attitude to physical change was associated with younger biological age, as measured by AgeAccelGrim and brain-predicted age difference in age-adjusted and sex-adjusted models: for an SD higher score, AgeAccelGrim was lower by -0.73 (95% CI -1.03 to -0.42) of a year, and brain-predicted age difference was lower by -0.87 (1.51 to 0.23) of a year. Both associations were attenuated by adjustment for covariates and not significant after simultaneous adjustment for all covariates and correction for multiple testing. More positive attitudes to physical change were associated with lower mortality: for an SD higher score the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HR (95% CI) was 0.66 (0.56 to 0.78). Adjustment for AgeAccelGrim or brain-predicted age difference attenuated this association slightly. It remained significant after adjustment for all covariates.

Conclusion: We found partial evidence that attitudes to ageing are linked with ageing biomarkers but they accounted for only a little of the association between attitudes and mortality.

Text
Attitudes to ageing biomarkers of ageing and mortality_9jan - Accepted Manuscript
Download (94kB)
Text
377.full
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (323kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 January 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 January 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452355
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452355
ISSN: 0143-005X
PURE UUID: 31c0cb3b-62e6-4c47-aa3e-b78c163758f2
ORCID for Catharine Gale: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-8638

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Dec 2021 18:47
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kyle J.J. McLachlan
Author: James H. Cole
Author: Sarah E. Harris
Author: Riccardo E. Marioni
Author: Ian J. Deary
Author: Catharine Gale ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×