The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules

Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules
Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules

Introduction Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) have a high reported accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of these.

Methods In this prospective multicentre trial, 380 participants with an SPN (8–30 mm) and no recent history of malignancy underwent DCE-CT and PET/CT. All patients underwent either biopsy with histological diagnosis or completed CT follow-up. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy for PET/CT and DCE-CT. Costs and cost-effectiveness were estimated from a healthcare provider perspective using a decision-model.

Results 312 participants (47% female, 68.1±9.0 years) completed the study, with 61% rate of malignancy at 2 years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values for DCE-CT were 95.3% (95% CI 91.3 to 97.5), 29.8% (95% CI 22.3 to 38.4), 68.2% (95% CI 62.4% to 73.5%) and 80.0% (95% CI 66.2 to 89.1), respectively, and for PET/CT were 79.1% (95% CI 72.7 to 84.2), 81.8% (95% CI 74.0 to 87.7), 87.3% (95% CI 81.5 to 91.5) and 71.2% (95% CI 63.2 to 78.1). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for DCE-CT and PET/CT was 0.62 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.67) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), respectively (p<0.001). Combined results significantly increased diagnostic accuracy over PET/CT alone (AUROC=0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.93), p<0.001). DCE-CT was preferred when the willingness to pay per incremental cost per correctly treated malignancy was below £9000. Above £15 500 a combined approach was preferred.

Conclusions PET/CT has a superior diagnostic accuracy to DCE-CT for the diagnosis of SPNs. Combining both techniques improves the diagnostic accuracy over either test alone and could be cost-effective.

 

 

0040-6376
Gilbert, Fiona J.
d0021270-f0b9-48ce-a68b-d7643418b8fc
Harris, Scott
19ea097b-df15-4f0f-be19-8ac42c190028
Miles, K.A.
60937eb3-fe5c-4bb5-8c19-93adbba4149e
Weir-McCall, Jonathan
3d9197c2-6550-42f5-855d-b2babcc70419
Qureshi, N.R.
5418a4b3-48e0-4594-a2b2-e092c2599ce7
Rintoul, R.C.
8850aabe-0eeb-40c0-978d-b3c8345ed27f
Dizdarevic, S.
7c04afc1-4607-4c56-8fd3-7bd72180d2db
Pike, L
7ee6232a-f58f-40dc-8356-9876f60f71c6
Sinclair, Donald
fd805c59-86a6-4e78-a293-844ff5d0fc7a
Shah, Andrew
c1332af8-1d4f-4343-988b-dbc7dbba138b
Eaton, Rosemary
176a6729-964e-4ec0-bb39-026db480fd55
Jones, Jeremy
270b303b-6bad-4be7-8ea0-63d0e8015c91
Clegg, A.J.
3df7836f-4b31-4409-aa05-eef5e55a8862
Vitiello, Benedetto
3c0da939-1f19-44b3-a49c-9df2d5830269
Hill, James
061b7c5e-5bdc-496a-b783-fa4e7f831921
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5
Tzelis, D
cd1af5c5-7fd9-475a-bdcc-7d90cd9577fd
Vale, Luke
d0be6b50-51db-4d59-9094-17dcb5582bd8
Brindle, Lucy
17158264-2a99-4786-afc0-30990240436c
Madden, J.
48adfcd0-5977-4ebb-96bd-4e80b56fcd94
Cozens, Kelly
ad334c90-643c-4e72-a957-7d3d15a938ce
Little, LA
de8d215f-477b-4c4c-b938-b63ac1ad6bdb
Eichhorst, Kathrin
ee84619d-a332-4390-80ca-bd41beded026
Moate, P.
c0496d75-18d7-41c2-b9c7-733dcd7a342a
McClement, C.
bd38a8f9-4257-4326-85a4-404089eb29d1
Peebles, Charles
5dcc9333-8a8a-4066-bd08-6052b2be4f1e
Bannerjee, A
f06d82d6-cd83-4232-ae00-1ffc5ae0ea6b
Han, S.
f0a0e662-7463-4bca-b45e-c0c8087b513e
Poon, F.W.
6d3bfd0f-71f5-4f77-9558-f0f450a607a9
Groves, A.M.
ec3fa8a1-4416-4f6a-93f9-20e344227987
Kurban, L.
7de381f6-52fd-4715-ba3d-3a7a6b208c4b
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Frew, Anthony
d763283a-879b-44ce-8d8e-c18e5868cc12
Callister, Matthew
0a1d4b62-4f9e-4375-885d-ce7bdba6d73e
Crosbie, P.
0ff4140e-e27d-4fe3-86c2-9405899c6aee
Gleeson, F.V.
cbd154c2-f42e-451b-80a9-38514f821c8f
Karunasaagarar, K
e170d4bc-4527-4ef7-a12d-d4768b0408c4
Kankam, O.
caef702f-8045-4d92-a459-79ea10195bfc
George, Steve
6ed0817d-dadd-44a1-9ab7-6a13c45ab306
Gilbert, Fiona J.
d0021270-f0b9-48ce-a68b-d7643418b8fc
Harris, Scott
19ea097b-df15-4f0f-be19-8ac42c190028
Miles, K.A.
60937eb3-fe5c-4bb5-8c19-93adbba4149e
Weir-McCall, Jonathan
3d9197c2-6550-42f5-855d-b2babcc70419
Qureshi, N.R.
5418a4b3-48e0-4594-a2b2-e092c2599ce7
Rintoul, R.C.
8850aabe-0eeb-40c0-978d-b3c8345ed27f
Dizdarevic, S.
7c04afc1-4607-4c56-8fd3-7bd72180d2db
Pike, L
7ee6232a-f58f-40dc-8356-9876f60f71c6
Sinclair, Donald
fd805c59-86a6-4e78-a293-844ff5d0fc7a
Shah, Andrew
c1332af8-1d4f-4343-988b-dbc7dbba138b
Eaton, Rosemary
176a6729-964e-4ec0-bb39-026db480fd55
Jones, Jeremy
270b303b-6bad-4be7-8ea0-63d0e8015c91
Clegg, A.J.
3df7836f-4b31-4409-aa05-eef5e55a8862
Vitiello, Benedetto
3c0da939-1f19-44b3-a49c-9df2d5830269
Hill, James
061b7c5e-5bdc-496a-b783-fa4e7f831921
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5
Tzelis, D
cd1af5c5-7fd9-475a-bdcc-7d90cd9577fd
Vale, Luke
d0be6b50-51db-4d59-9094-17dcb5582bd8
Brindle, Lucy
17158264-2a99-4786-afc0-30990240436c
Madden, J.
48adfcd0-5977-4ebb-96bd-4e80b56fcd94
Cozens, Kelly
ad334c90-643c-4e72-a957-7d3d15a938ce
Little, LA
de8d215f-477b-4c4c-b938-b63ac1ad6bdb
Eichhorst, Kathrin
ee84619d-a332-4390-80ca-bd41beded026
Moate, P.
c0496d75-18d7-41c2-b9c7-733dcd7a342a
McClement, C.
bd38a8f9-4257-4326-85a4-404089eb29d1
Peebles, Charles
5dcc9333-8a8a-4066-bd08-6052b2be4f1e
Bannerjee, A
f06d82d6-cd83-4232-ae00-1ffc5ae0ea6b
Han, S.
f0a0e662-7463-4bca-b45e-c0c8087b513e
Poon, F.W.
6d3bfd0f-71f5-4f77-9558-f0f450a607a9
Groves, A.M.
ec3fa8a1-4416-4f6a-93f9-20e344227987
Kurban, L.
7de381f6-52fd-4715-ba3d-3a7a6b208c4b
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Frew, Anthony
d763283a-879b-44ce-8d8e-c18e5868cc12
Callister, Matthew
0a1d4b62-4f9e-4375-885d-ce7bdba6d73e
Crosbie, P.
0ff4140e-e27d-4fe3-86c2-9405899c6aee
Gleeson, F.V.
cbd154c2-f42e-451b-80a9-38514f821c8f
Karunasaagarar, K
e170d4bc-4527-4ef7-a12d-d4768b0408c4
Kankam, O.
caef702f-8045-4d92-a459-79ea10195bfc
George, Steve
6ed0817d-dadd-44a1-9ab7-6a13c45ab306

Gilbert, Fiona J., Harris, Scott, Miles, K.A., Weir-McCall, Jonathan, Qureshi, N.R., Rintoul, R.C., Dizdarevic, S., Pike, L, Sinclair, Donald, Shah, Andrew, Eaton, Rosemary, Jones, Jeremy, Clegg, A.J., Vitiello, Benedetto, Hill, James, Cook, Andrew, Tzelis, D, Vale, Luke, Brindle, Lucy, Madden, J., Cozens, Kelly, Little, LA, Eichhorst, Kathrin, Moate, P., McClement, C., Peebles, Charles, Bannerjee, A, Han, S., Poon, F.W., Groves, A.M., Kurban, L., Roderick, Paul, Frew, Anthony, Callister, Matthew, Crosbie, P., Gleeson, F.V., Karunasaagarar, K, Kankam, O. and George, Steve (2021) Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Thorax, [216948]. (doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216948).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) have a high reported accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of these.

Methods In this prospective multicentre trial, 380 participants with an SPN (8–30 mm) and no recent history of malignancy underwent DCE-CT and PET/CT. All patients underwent either biopsy with histological diagnosis or completed CT follow-up. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy for PET/CT and DCE-CT. Costs and cost-effectiveness were estimated from a healthcare provider perspective using a decision-model.

Results 312 participants (47% female, 68.1±9.0 years) completed the study, with 61% rate of malignancy at 2 years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values for DCE-CT were 95.3% (95% CI 91.3 to 97.5), 29.8% (95% CI 22.3 to 38.4), 68.2% (95% CI 62.4% to 73.5%) and 80.0% (95% CI 66.2 to 89.1), respectively, and for PET/CT were 79.1% (95% CI 72.7 to 84.2), 81.8% (95% CI 74.0 to 87.7), 87.3% (95% CI 81.5 to 91.5) and 71.2% (95% CI 63.2 to 78.1). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for DCE-CT and PET/CT was 0.62 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.67) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), respectively (p<0.001). Combined results significantly increased diagnostic accuracy over PET/CT alone (AUROC=0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.93), p<0.001). DCE-CT was preferred when the willingness to pay per incremental cost per correctly treated malignancy was below £9000. Above £15 500 a combined approach was preferred.

Conclusions PET/CT has a superior diagnostic accuracy to DCE-CT for the diagnosis of SPNs. Combining both techniques improves the diagnostic accuracy over either test alone and could be cost-effective.

 

 

Text
SPUTNIK main results paper_Thorax R2 20210930 CLEAN - Accepted Manuscript
Download (143kB)
Text
thoraxjnl-2021-216948.full - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 October 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 December 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452724
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452724
ISSN: 0040-6376
PURE UUID: dee67d9c-8bee-4b87-8ff0-5fbffae8f393
ORCID for Andrew Cook: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-439X
ORCID for Lucy Brindle: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-3754
ORCID for Kelly Cozens: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-9100
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Dec 2021 17:42
Last modified: 11 May 2024 01:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Fiona J. Gilbert
Author: Scott Harris
Author: K.A. Miles
Author: Jonathan Weir-McCall
Author: N.R. Qureshi
Author: R.C. Rintoul
Author: S. Dizdarevic
Author: L Pike
Author: Donald Sinclair
Author: Andrew Shah
Author: Rosemary Eaton
Author: Jeremy Jones
Author: A.J. Clegg
Author: Benedetto Vitiello
Author: James Hill
Author: Andrew Cook ORCID iD
Author: D Tzelis
Author: Luke Vale
Author: Lucy Brindle ORCID iD
Author: J. Madden
Author: Kelly Cozens ORCID iD
Author: LA Little
Author: Kathrin Eichhorst
Author: P. Moate
Author: C. McClement
Author: Charles Peebles
Author: A Bannerjee
Author: S. Han
Author: F.W. Poon
Author: A.M. Groves
Author: L. Kurban
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: Anthony Frew
Author: Matthew Callister
Author: P. Crosbie
Author: F.V. Gleeson
Author: K Karunasaagarar
Author: O. Kankam
Author: Steve George

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×