The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of vibration and noise characteristics of urban rail transit bridges with box-girder and U-shaped sections

Comparison of vibration and noise characteristics of urban rail transit bridges with box-girder and U-shaped sections
Comparison of vibration and noise characteristics of urban rail transit bridges with box-girder and U-shaped sections
Rolling noise and structure-borne noise from rail transit viaducts often lead to complaints from nearby residents. Concrete box section bridges are commonly adopted for the viaducts but those with U-shaped sections have become popular recently due to their more attractive form and reduced visual impact. One question that often arises in relation to the choice of the section types is their relative noise performance. This study aims to compare the vibration and noise characteristics of concrete bridges with different sections in a systematic way by using the same noise prediction method. A coupled track-bridge model is introduced to obtain the rail vibration and the power input to the bridge through the rail fasteners. A three-dimensional vibro-acoustic finite element method is applied to obtain the noise radiated from the bridge and the rail subjected to sets of multiple forces acting on them. This is determined in terms of the radiation efficiency and sound pressure transfer functions for arbitrary forcing. The averaged mean squared vibration velocity of the coupled wheel-track-bridge model subjected to roughness excitation is used to scale the noise from the acoustic model. The method is validated by comparison with field measurements of noise from a U-shaped bridge in Shanghai. Comparative investigations are then conducted of the U-shaped bridge, a box girder bridge with single cell and a twin-box girder bridge with two cells; each is fitted with equivalent noise barriers. It is found in each case that the noise from the rail is about 10 dB(A) larger than the bridge noise at positions to the side of the bridge. The U-shaped girder generally leads to slightly lower total noise levels than the box girders, with differences of less than 1 dB(A) when they have noise barriers of the same height. In terms of the bridge noise, however, the single-box and twin-box girders produce an average of 8.6 and 11.7 dB(A) less noise than the U-shaped girder.
concrete bridges, finite element method, urban rail transit, vibration and noise, wheel-rail interaction, Finite element method, Concrete bridges, Wheel-rail interaction, Vibration and noise, Urban rail transit
0003-682X
Li, Qi
193e5502-fc0d-4a67-8b41-ed4d8b560c2f
Dai, Baorui
5556fc67-7196-45a4-b38a-99cfbfac1569
Zhu, Zhihui
b2919993-b9f2-43d0-9c01-fc771b7cd924
Thompson, David
bca37fd3-d692-4779-b663-5916b01edae5
Li, Qi
193e5502-fc0d-4a67-8b41-ed4d8b560c2f
Dai, Baorui
5556fc67-7196-45a4-b38a-99cfbfac1569
Zhu, Zhihui
b2919993-b9f2-43d0-9c01-fc771b7cd924
Thompson, David
bca37fd3-d692-4779-b663-5916b01edae5

Li, Qi, Dai, Baorui, Zhu, Zhihui and Thompson, David (2022) Comparison of vibration and noise characteristics of urban rail transit bridges with box-girder and U-shaped sections. Applied Acoustics, 186, [108494]. (doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108494).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Rolling noise and structure-borne noise from rail transit viaducts often lead to complaints from nearby residents. Concrete box section bridges are commonly adopted for the viaducts but those with U-shaped sections have become popular recently due to their more attractive form and reduced visual impact. One question that often arises in relation to the choice of the section types is their relative noise performance. This study aims to compare the vibration and noise characteristics of concrete bridges with different sections in a systematic way by using the same noise prediction method. A coupled track-bridge model is introduced to obtain the rail vibration and the power input to the bridge through the rail fasteners. A three-dimensional vibro-acoustic finite element method is applied to obtain the noise radiated from the bridge and the rail subjected to sets of multiple forces acting on them. This is determined in terms of the radiation efficiency and sound pressure transfer functions for arbitrary forcing. The averaged mean squared vibration velocity of the coupled wheel-track-bridge model subjected to roughness excitation is used to scale the noise from the acoustic model. The method is validated by comparison with field measurements of noise from a U-shaped bridge in Shanghai. Comparative investigations are then conducted of the U-shaped bridge, a box girder bridge with single cell and a twin-box girder bridge with two cells; each is fitted with equivalent noise barriers. It is found in each case that the noise from the rail is about 10 dB(A) larger than the bridge noise at positions to the side of the bridge. The U-shaped girder generally leads to slightly lower total noise levels than the box girders, with differences of less than 1 dB(A) when they have noise barriers of the same height. In terms of the bridge noise, however, the single-box and twin-box girders produce an average of 8.6 and 11.7 dB(A) less noise than the U-shaped girder.

Text
Bridge noise comparison - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 October 2021
Published date: 15 January 2022
Keywords: concrete bridges, finite element method, urban rail transit, vibration and noise, wheel-rail interaction, Finite element method, Concrete bridges, Wheel-rail interaction, Vibration and noise, Urban rail transit

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452752
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452752
ISSN: 0003-682X
PURE UUID: e6f89130-679a-43b6-9c18-c47e5e8d9708
ORCID for David Thompson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-5906

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Dec 2021 18:18
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Qi Li
Author: Baorui Dai
Author: Zhihui Zhu
Author: David Thompson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×