Weight-for-height is associated with an overestimation of thinness burden in comparison to BMI-for-age in under-5 populations with high stunting prevalence
Weight-for-height is associated with an overestimation of thinness burden in comparison to BMI-for-age in under-5 populations with high stunting prevalence
Background: thinness at <5 years of age, also known as wasting, is used to assess the nutritional status of populations for programmatic purposes. Thinness may be defined when either weight-for-height or body-mass-index-for-age (BMI-for-age) are below –2 SD of the respective World Health Organization standards. These definitions were compared for quantifying the burden of thinness.
Methods: theoretical consequences of ignoring age were evaluated by comparing, at varying height-for-age z-scores, the age- and sex-specific cut-offs of BMI that would define thinness with these two metrics. Thinness prevalence was then compared in simulated populations (short, intermediate and tall) and real-life data sets from research and the National Family Health Survey-4 (NFHS-4) in India.
Results: in short (–2 SD) children, the BMI cut-offs with weight-for-height criteria were higher in comparison to BMI-for-age after 1 year of age but lower at earlier ages. In Indian research and NFHS-4 data sets (short populations), thinness prevalence with weight-for-height was lower from 0.5 to 1 years but higher at subsequent ages. The absolute difference (weight-for-height – BMI-for-age) for 0.5–5 years was 4.6% (15.9–11.3%) and 2.2% (19.2–17.0%), respectively; this attenuated in the 0–5 years age group. The discrepancy was higher in boys and maximal for stunted children, reducing with increasing stature. In simulated data sets from intermediate and tall populations, there were no meaningful differences.
Conclusions: the two definitions produce cut-offs, and hence estimates of thinness, that differ with the age, sex and height of children. The relative invariance, with age and stature, of the BMI-for-age thinness definition favours its use as the preferred index for programmatic purposes.
Rajeev, L Naga
b9eb9d4a-bd39-46bd-aa76-92c9a6e4c255
Saini, Monika
f75bd239-1133-49f6-b61c-cbabf52e8368
Kumar, Ashish
f6b4297f-9f9d-4bc9-8970-bc90c74cc95f
Sinha, Sikha
19a9d7f0-2f65-4c91-a263-d41f8c2ec273
Osmond, Clive
2677bf85-494f-4a78-adf8-580e1b8acb81
Sachdev, Harshpal Singh
2fca6c24-2750-47b4-b675-7c7da6e5c987
22 November 2021
Rajeev, L Naga
b9eb9d4a-bd39-46bd-aa76-92c9a6e4c255
Saini, Monika
f75bd239-1133-49f6-b61c-cbabf52e8368
Kumar, Ashish
f6b4297f-9f9d-4bc9-8970-bc90c74cc95f
Sinha, Sikha
19a9d7f0-2f65-4c91-a263-d41f8c2ec273
Osmond, Clive
2677bf85-494f-4a78-adf8-580e1b8acb81
Sachdev, Harshpal Singh
2fca6c24-2750-47b4-b675-7c7da6e5c987
Rajeev, L Naga, Saini, Monika, Kumar, Ashish, Sinha, Sikha, Osmond, Clive and Sachdev, Harshpal Singh
(2021)
Weight-for-height is associated with an overestimation of thinness burden in comparison to BMI-for-age in under-5 populations with high stunting prevalence.
International Journal of Epidemiology.
(doi:10.1093/ije/dyab238).
Abstract
Background: thinness at <5 years of age, also known as wasting, is used to assess the nutritional status of populations for programmatic purposes. Thinness may be defined when either weight-for-height or body-mass-index-for-age (BMI-for-age) are below –2 SD of the respective World Health Organization standards. These definitions were compared for quantifying the burden of thinness.
Methods: theoretical consequences of ignoring age were evaluated by comparing, at varying height-for-age z-scores, the age- and sex-specific cut-offs of BMI that would define thinness with these two metrics. Thinness prevalence was then compared in simulated populations (short, intermediate and tall) and real-life data sets from research and the National Family Health Survey-4 (NFHS-4) in India.
Results: in short (–2 SD) children, the BMI cut-offs with weight-for-height criteria were higher in comparison to BMI-for-age after 1 year of age but lower at earlier ages. In Indian research and NFHS-4 data sets (short populations), thinness prevalence with weight-for-height was lower from 0.5 to 1 years but higher at subsequent ages. The absolute difference (weight-for-height – BMI-for-age) for 0.5–5 years was 4.6% (15.9–11.3%) and 2.2% (19.2–17.0%), respectively; this attenuated in the 0–5 years age group. The discrepancy was higher in boys and maximal for stunted children, reducing with increasing stature. In simulated data sets from intermediate and tall populations, there were no meaningful differences.
Conclusions: the two definitions produce cut-offs, and hence estimates of thinness, that differ with the age, sex and height of children. The relative invariance, with age and stature, of the BMI-for-age thinness definition favours its use as the preferred index for programmatic purposes.
Text
Undernutrition Main Text R3 (Accepted version)
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Undernutrition paper Supplementary Data IJE (Accepted version)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 October 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 November 2021
Published date: 22 November 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 452762
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452762
ISSN: 0300-5771
PURE UUID: 3836995a-bc5b-4571-b16c-709420528f2e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Dec 2021 17:30
Last modified: 22 Nov 2022 05:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
L Naga Rajeev
Author:
Monika Saini
Author:
Ashish Kumar
Author:
Sikha Sinha
Author:
Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics