The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Auditory brainstem response detection using machine learning: a comparison with statistical detection methods

Auditory brainstem response detection using machine learning: a comparison with statistical detection methods
Auditory brainstem response detection using machine learning: a comparison with statistical detection methods
Objectives: the primary objective of this study was to train and test machine learning algorithms to be able to detect accurately whether EEG data contains an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or not and recommend suitable machine learning methods. In addition, the performance of the best machine learning algorithm was compared with that of prominent statistical detection methods.

Design: four machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using nested k-fold cross-validation: a random forest, a convolutional long short-term memory network, a stacked ensemble, and a multilayer perceptron. The best method was evaluated on a separate test set and compared with conventional detection methods: Fsp, Fmp, q-sample uniform scores test, and Hotelling’s T2 test. The models were trained and tested on simulated data that were generated based on recorded ABRs collected from 12 normal-hearing participants and no-stimulus EEG data from 15 participants. Simulation allowed the ground truth of the data (“response present” or “response absent”) to be known.

Results: the sensitivity of the best machine learning algorithm, a stacked ensemble, was significantly greater than that of the conventional detection methods evaluated. The stacked ensemble, evaluated using a bootstrap approach, consistently achieved a high and stable level of specificity across ensemble sizes.

Conclusions: the stacked ensemble model presented was more effective than conventional statistical ABR detection methods and the alternative machine learning approaches tested. The stacked ensemble detection method may have potential both in automated ABR screening devices as well as in evoked potential software, assisting clinicians in making decisions regarding a patient’s ABR threshold. Further assessment of the model’s generalizability using a large cohort of subject recorded data, including participants of different ages and hearing status, is a recommended next step.
0196-0202
McKearney, Richard, Michael
279c26fc-e03a-48c2-9b43-8d3d6d877407
Bell, Steven
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a
Chesnaye, Michael
5f337509-3255-4322-b1bf-d4d3836b36ec
Simpson, David
53674880-f381-4cc9-8505-6a97eeac3c2a
McKearney, Richard, Michael
279c26fc-e03a-48c2-9b43-8d3d6d877407
Bell, Steven
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a
Chesnaye, Michael
5f337509-3255-4322-b1bf-d4d3836b36ec
Simpson, David
53674880-f381-4cc9-8505-6a97eeac3c2a

McKearney, Richard, Michael, Bell, Steven, Chesnaye, Michael and Simpson, David (2021) Auditory brainstem response detection using machine learning: a comparison with statistical detection methods. Ear and Hearing. (doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001151).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: the primary objective of this study was to train and test machine learning algorithms to be able to detect accurately whether EEG data contains an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or not and recommend suitable machine learning methods. In addition, the performance of the best machine learning algorithm was compared with that of prominent statistical detection methods.

Design: four machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using nested k-fold cross-validation: a random forest, a convolutional long short-term memory network, a stacked ensemble, and a multilayer perceptron. The best method was evaluated on a separate test set and compared with conventional detection methods: Fsp, Fmp, q-sample uniform scores test, and Hotelling’s T2 test. The models were trained and tested on simulated data that were generated based on recorded ABRs collected from 12 normal-hearing participants and no-stimulus EEG data from 15 participants. Simulation allowed the ground truth of the data (“response present” or “response absent”) to be known.

Results: the sensitivity of the best machine learning algorithm, a stacked ensemble, was significantly greater than that of the conventional detection methods evaluated. The stacked ensemble, evaluated using a bootstrap approach, consistently achieved a high and stable level of specificity across ensemble sizes.

Conclusions: the stacked ensemble model presented was more effective than conventional statistical ABR detection methods and the alternative machine learning approaches tested. The stacked ensemble detection method may have potential both in automated ABR screening devices as well as in evoked potential software, assisting clinicians in making decisions regarding a patient’s ABR threshold. Further assessment of the model’s generalizability using a large cohort of subject recorded data, including participants of different ages and hearing status, is a recommended next step.

Text
Auditory Brainstem Response Detection using Machine Learning: A Comparison with Statistical Detection Methods - Accepted Manuscript
Download (7MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 September 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 November 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452787
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452787
ISSN: 0196-0202
PURE UUID: a98d89bc-3f96-43ca-a875-a0e102f286ee
ORCID for Richard, Michael McKearney: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-5617
ORCID for David Simpson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-5088

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Dec 2021 17:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard, Michael McKearney ORCID iD
Author: Steven Bell
Author: Michael Chesnaye
Author: David Simpson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×