The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making

Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making
Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making

Pollinator declines have prompted efforts to assess how land-use change affects insect pollinators and pollination services in agricultural landscapes. Yet many tools to measure insect pollination services require substantial landscape-scale data and technical expertise. In expert workshops, 3 straightforward methods (desk-based method, field survey, and empirical manipulation with exclusion experiments) for rapid insect pollination assessment at site scale were developed to provide an adaptable framework that is accessible to nonspecialist with limited resources. These methods were designed for TESSA (Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-Based Assessment) and allow comparative assessment of pollination services at a site of conservation interest and in its most plausible alternative state (e.g., converted to agricultural land). We applied the methods at a nature reserve in the United Kingdom to estimate the value of insect pollination services provided by the reserve. The economic value of pollination services provided by the reserve ranged from US$6163 to US$11,546/year. The conversion of the reserve to arable land would provide no insect pollination services and a net annual benefit from insect-pollinated crop production of approximately $1542/year (US$24∙ha -1 ∙year -1 ). The methods had wide applicability and were readily adapted to different insect-pollinated crops: rape (Brassica napus) and beans (Vicia faba) crops. All methods were rapidly employed under a low budget. The relatively less robust methods that required fewer resources yielded higher estimates of annual insect pollination benefit.

TESSA, colza, dependency ratio, ecosystem services, exclusion experiment, experimento de exclusión, field beans, frecuencia de visita, haba común, insect pollinators, insectos polinizadores, oilseed rape, servicios ambientales, visitation frequency, índice de dependencia
0888-8892
Ratto, Fabrizia
d2438dc9-5df4-4c4d-a7ed-022fc3d97919
Breeze, Tom D.
8e3828a8-e1f1-4de0-bfab-3e838ee5fc51
Cole, Lorna J.
03ead1ef-2485-43b6-9149-94c54cd50f64
Garratt, Michael P. D.
7849cdd5-dfa4-4368-a0ca-f2f24784ce57
Kleijn, David
1abdc6c0-05e4-4dde-8075-871093893b59
Kunin, Bill
612a2a3c-0ecb-46cc-9062-39c2df78afde
Michez, Denis
304a2888-81d6-4739-b08f-3391d86a9741
O'Connor, Rory
eb42bad9-ac6b-4d50-bb76-cf08f0a07235
Ollerton, Jeff
5b7bec8e-dfd8-46d6-bb62-bd93935800ec
Paxton, Robert J.
f07ade92-fda7-4094-a4c0-ee4f7491ba05
Poppy, Guy M.
5abecabc-526f-4ce6-b4c8-93041ee01c7a
Potts, Simon G.
199759eb-ea04-429f-a442-a038c9087315
Senapathi, Deepa
e0ad1c1f-6883-4d48-9ae5-49e8bae786ba
Shaw, Rosalind
ac94bebc-de94-4d40-8dd7-05fc069eddd9
Dicks, Lynn V.
06375034-88ea-4aca-a70c-aa09f9ef266f
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc
Ratto, Fabrizia
d2438dc9-5df4-4c4d-a7ed-022fc3d97919
Breeze, Tom D.
8e3828a8-e1f1-4de0-bfab-3e838ee5fc51
Cole, Lorna J.
03ead1ef-2485-43b6-9149-94c54cd50f64
Garratt, Michael P. D.
7849cdd5-dfa4-4368-a0ca-f2f24784ce57
Kleijn, David
1abdc6c0-05e4-4dde-8075-871093893b59
Kunin, Bill
612a2a3c-0ecb-46cc-9062-39c2df78afde
Michez, Denis
304a2888-81d6-4739-b08f-3391d86a9741
O'Connor, Rory
eb42bad9-ac6b-4d50-bb76-cf08f0a07235
Ollerton, Jeff
5b7bec8e-dfd8-46d6-bb62-bd93935800ec
Paxton, Robert J.
f07ade92-fda7-4094-a4c0-ee4f7491ba05
Poppy, Guy M.
5abecabc-526f-4ce6-b4c8-93041ee01c7a
Potts, Simon G.
199759eb-ea04-429f-a442-a038c9087315
Senapathi, Deepa
e0ad1c1f-6883-4d48-9ae5-49e8bae786ba
Shaw, Rosalind
ac94bebc-de94-4d40-8dd7-05fc069eddd9
Dicks, Lynn V.
06375034-88ea-4aca-a70c-aa09f9ef266f
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc

Ratto, Fabrizia, Breeze, Tom D., Cole, Lorna J., Garratt, Michael P. D., Kleijn, David, Kunin, Bill, Michez, Denis, O'Connor, Rory, Ollerton, Jeff, Paxton, Robert J., Poppy, Guy M., Potts, Simon G., Senapathi, Deepa, Shaw, Rosalind, Dicks, Lynn V. and Peh, Kelvin S.-H. (2022) Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making. Conservation Biology, 36 (4), [e13886]. (doi:10.1111/cobi.13886).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Pollinator declines have prompted efforts to assess how land-use change affects insect pollinators and pollination services in agricultural landscapes. Yet many tools to measure insect pollination services require substantial landscape-scale data and technical expertise. In expert workshops, 3 straightforward methods (desk-based method, field survey, and empirical manipulation with exclusion experiments) for rapid insect pollination assessment at site scale were developed to provide an adaptable framework that is accessible to nonspecialist with limited resources. These methods were designed for TESSA (Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-Based Assessment) and allow comparative assessment of pollination services at a site of conservation interest and in its most plausible alternative state (e.g., converted to agricultural land). We applied the methods at a nature reserve in the United Kingdom to estimate the value of insect pollination services provided by the reserve. The economic value of pollination services provided by the reserve ranged from US$6163 to US$11,546/year. The conversion of the reserve to arable land would provide no insect pollination services and a net annual benefit from insect-pollinated crop production of approximately $1542/year (US$24∙ha -1 ∙year -1 ). The methods had wide applicability and were readily adapted to different insect-pollinated crops: rape (Brassica napus) and beans (Vicia faba) crops. All methods were rapidly employed under a low budget. The relatively less robust methods that required fewer resources yielded higher estimates of annual insect pollination benefit.

Text
Conservation Biology - 2022 - Ratto - Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision‐making - Accepted Manuscript
Download (918kB)
Text
Conservation Biology - 2022 - Ratto - Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision‐making - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 January 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 January 2022
Published date: August 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: We thank the staff at the Selborne Landscape Partnership for granting access to their farms. We are grateful to E.A‐T, R.M‐C, and A.P‐D for their field assistance. This study was part of F.R.’s PhD project, funded by the Institute for Life Sciences and School Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, and K.S.H.P.’s starting grant. L.C. received funding from Scottish Government Rural Affairs, the Environment Strategic Research Programme 2016‐2021, and SRUC Research Excellence Grant. L.V.D. is funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant NE/N014472/1). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology
Keywords: TESSA, colza, dependency ratio, ecosystem services, exclusion experiment, experimento de exclusión, field beans, frecuencia de visita, haba común, insect pollinators, insectos polinizadores, oilseed rape, servicios ambientales, visitation frequency, índice de dependencia

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452859
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452859
ISSN: 0888-8892
PURE UUID: 712c2100-a73f-4bf4-b55f-bab37d7d0277
ORCID for Fabrizia Ratto: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-4379
ORCID for Kelvin S.-H. Peh: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-1341

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Dec 2021 17:57
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Fabrizia Ratto ORCID iD
Author: Tom D. Breeze
Author: Lorna J. Cole
Author: Michael P. D. Garratt
Author: David Kleijn
Author: Bill Kunin
Author: Denis Michez
Author: Rory O'Connor
Author: Jeff Ollerton
Author: Robert J. Paxton
Author: Guy M. Poppy
Author: Simon G. Potts
Author: Deepa Senapathi
Author: Rosalind Shaw
Author: Lynn V. Dicks

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×