The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Automatic and focused hair pulling in trichotillomania: Valid and useful subtypes?

Automatic and focused hair pulling in trichotillomania: Valid and useful subtypes?
Automatic and focused hair pulling in trichotillomania: Valid and useful subtypes?

Prior work suggested that trichotillomania may have four subtypes based on the extent to which pulling is automatic or focused in nature. 238 adults with trichotillomania undertook clinical and cognitive assessments and were assigned into four subtypes based on k-means clustering of Milwaukee Inventory for Subtypes of Trichotillomania-Adult Version (MIST-A) scores. We examined whether a cluster solution was apparent using conventional metrics. Based on prior literature, we then force-fitted a four subtype model (low-low, low-high, high-low, high-high). Subtypes were compared and validity of the MIST-A subtyping approach was evaluated. A cluster solution did not converge based on conventional metrics. Following force-fitting, subtypes did not differ on demographic variables, age at symptom onset, nor duration of illness. The high-focused high-automatic subtype had worse symptom severity than other subtypes. Co-morbid depression was more common in the low-focused low-automatic and high-focused low-automatic subtypes. This study suggests that MIST-A subtypes may not be valid or clinically useful based on several issues. First, k-means models indicated that the MIST-A data did not generate any cluster solutions. Second, when a forced cluster solution was fitted, the subtypes did not differ on the vast majority of measures. Third, force-fitting four subtypes yielded findings that were logically inconsistent (e.g. worse quality of life in one group, but higher rates of comorbid anxiety/depression in others). Overall, we suggest that both focused and automatic pulling may characterize the same pulling episode, or certainly the same person across episodes. Thus they may be clinically relevant variables, but not forming coherent subtypes.

Automatic, Comorbidity, Focused, Subtypes, Trichotillomania
0165-1781
Grant, Jon E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Grant, Jon E.
07372bd5-8a0d-42b4-b41b-e376c652acf3
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f

Grant, Jon E. and Chamberlain, Samuel R. (2021) Automatic and focused hair pulling in trichotillomania: Valid and useful subtypes? Psychiatry Research, 306, [114269]. (doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114269).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Prior work suggested that trichotillomania may have four subtypes based on the extent to which pulling is automatic or focused in nature. 238 adults with trichotillomania undertook clinical and cognitive assessments and were assigned into four subtypes based on k-means clustering of Milwaukee Inventory for Subtypes of Trichotillomania-Adult Version (MIST-A) scores. We examined whether a cluster solution was apparent using conventional metrics. Based on prior literature, we then force-fitted a four subtype model (low-low, low-high, high-low, high-high). Subtypes were compared and validity of the MIST-A subtyping approach was evaluated. A cluster solution did not converge based on conventional metrics. Following force-fitting, subtypes did not differ on demographic variables, age at symptom onset, nor duration of illness. The high-focused high-automatic subtype had worse symptom severity than other subtypes. Co-morbid depression was more common in the low-focused low-automatic and high-focused low-automatic subtypes. This study suggests that MIST-A subtypes may not be valid or clinically useful based on several issues. First, k-means models indicated that the MIST-A data did not generate any cluster solutions. Second, when a forced cluster solution was fitted, the subtypes did not differ on the vast majority of measures. Third, force-fitting four subtypes yielded findings that were logically inconsistent (e.g. worse quality of life in one group, but higher rates of comorbid anxiety/depression in others). Overall, we suggest that both focused and automatic pulling may characterize the same pulling episode, or certainly the same person across episodes. Thus they may be clinically relevant variables, but not forming coherent subtypes.

Text
TTM and Pulling Style-10-25-21-clean copy - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (60kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 October 2021
Published date: December 2021
Additional Information: Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Automatic, Comorbidity, Focused, Subtypes, Trichotillomania

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453089
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453089
ISSN: 0165-1781
PURE UUID: 18b42185-89b1-4e6e-975c-63e7e41ee1c8
ORCID for Samuel R. Chamberlain: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-8121

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jan 2022 18:11
Last modified: 30 Aug 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jon E. Grant
Author: Samuel R. Chamberlain ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×