A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure
A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure
In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach.
CRITIC, Cross-efficiency, Data envelopment analysis, Fairness, Two-stage
Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos
59c7026c-01a6-475f-9774-12efea43d86a
Beullens, Patrick
893ad2e2-0617-47d6-910b-3d5f81964a9c
Klein, Jonathan
639e04f0-059a-4566-9361-a4edda0dba7d
1 January 2022
Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos
59c7026c-01a6-475f-9774-12efea43d86a
Beullens, Patrick
893ad2e2-0617-47d6-910b-3d5f81964a9c
Klein, Jonathan
639e04f0-059a-4566-9361-a4edda0dba7d
Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos, Beullens, Patrick and Klein, Jonathan
(2022)
A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure.
Expert Systems with Applications, 187, [115921].
(doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921).
Abstract
In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach.
Text
Marios Dominikos Kremantzis_ESWA
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 September 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 September 2021
Published date: 1 January 2022
Keywords:
CRITIC, Cross-efficiency, Data envelopment analysis, Fairness, Two-stage
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453233
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453233
ISSN: 0957-4174
PURE UUID: e169fcea-e02d-4d7b-84a1-d41630b1ccf3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jan 2022 17:40
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 04:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics