The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy in the context of COVID-19: development of a digital intervention

Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy in the context of COVID-19: development of a digital intervention
Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy in the context of COVID-19: development of a digital intervention

Objectives: Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in late 2019, spreading to over 200 countries and resulting in almost two million deaths worldwide. The emergence of safe and effective vaccines provides a route out of the pandemic, with vaccination uptake of 75–90% needed to achieve population protection. Vaccine hesitancy is problematic for vaccine rollout; global reports suggest only 73% of the population may agree to being vaccinated. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop equitable and accessible interventions to address vaccine hesitancy at the population level. 

Study Design & Method: we report the development of a scalable digital intervention seeking to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and enhance uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom. Guided by motivational interviewing (MI) principles, the intervention includes a series of therapeutic dialogues addressing 10 key concerns of vaccine-hesitant individuals. Development of the intervention occurred linearly across four stages. During stage 1, we identified common reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy through analysis of existing survey data, a rapid systematic literature review, and public engagement workshops. Stage 2 comprised qualitative interviews with medical, immunological, and public health experts. Rapid content and thematic analysis of the data provided evidence-based responses to common vaccine concerns. Stage 3 involved the development of therapeutic dialogues through workshops with psychological and digital behaviour change experts. Dialogues were developed to address concerns using MI principles, including embracing resistance and supporting self-efficacy. Finally, stage 4 involved digitisation of the dialogues and pilot testing with members of the public. 

Discussion: the digital intervention provides an evidence-based approach to addressing vaccine hesitancy through MI principles. The dialogues are user-selected, allowing exploration of relevant issues associated with hesitancy in a non-judgmental context. The text-based content and digital format allow for rapid modification to changing information and scalability for wider dissemination.

COVID-19, Intervention, Motivational interviewing, Vaccine hesitancy
0033-3506
98-107
Knight, Holly
4acc6375-60ba-43f2-876e-08aa78205781
Ayling, Kieran
aac93711-ce2b-4d0d-ac42-54633824db01
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Baker, Katherine
b7a30fd7-c004-41d0-9886-7f2efa2337be
Chalder, Trudie
e1a808ea-763d-4c90-9d9f-86bb6af42edf
Morling, J
62a6ef47-23f8-4695-a193-ebb3168cf43a
Durrant, L
7987f7da-b201-4ffb-8cf7-6efbb381303f
Avery, T
698b5bbe-0f93-454d-965f-e39fdc92849f
Ball, J
82a76357-cb8e-4e18-a083-a73aa5a2be06
Barker, Caroline
f9da4841-24b4-431a-833c-b4b5ec66a4da
Bennett, R
8a883efc-210c-442b-983e-ea7936e4e055
McKeever, T
e710e91e-8f39-4f11-aaeb-dca35d805def
Vedhara, Kavita
95cd3fe5-204a-40a5-b4e3-b4c576dc3145
Knight, Holly
4acc6375-60ba-43f2-876e-08aa78205781
Ayling, Kieran
aac93711-ce2b-4d0d-ac42-54633824db01
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Baker, Katherine
b7a30fd7-c004-41d0-9886-7f2efa2337be
Chalder, Trudie
e1a808ea-763d-4c90-9d9f-86bb6af42edf
Morling, J
62a6ef47-23f8-4695-a193-ebb3168cf43a
Durrant, L
7987f7da-b201-4ffb-8cf7-6efbb381303f
Avery, T
698b5bbe-0f93-454d-965f-e39fdc92849f
Ball, J
82a76357-cb8e-4e18-a083-a73aa5a2be06
Barker, Caroline
f9da4841-24b4-431a-833c-b4b5ec66a4da
Bennett, R
8a883efc-210c-442b-983e-ea7936e4e055
McKeever, T
e710e91e-8f39-4f11-aaeb-dca35d805def
Vedhara, Kavita
95cd3fe5-204a-40a5-b4e3-b4c576dc3145

Knight, Holly, Ayling, Kieran, Bradbury, Katherine, Baker, Katherine, Chalder, Trudie, Morling, J, Durrant, L, Avery, T, Ball, J, Barker, Caroline, Bennett, R, McKeever, T and Vedhara, Kavita (2021) Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy in the context of COVID-19: development of a digital intervention. Public Health, 201, 98-107. (doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in late 2019, spreading to over 200 countries and resulting in almost two million deaths worldwide. The emergence of safe and effective vaccines provides a route out of the pandemic, with vaccination uptake of 75–90% needed to achieve population protection. Vaccine hesitancy is problematic for vaccine rollout; global reports suggest only 73% of the population may agree to being vaccinated. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop equitable and accessible interventions to address vaccine hesitancy at the population level. 

Study Design & Method: we report the development of a scalable digital intervention seeking to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and enhance uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom. Guided by motivational interviewing (MI) principles, the intervention includes a series of therapeutic dialogues addressing 10 key concerns of vaccine-hesitant individuals. Development of the intervention occurred linearly across four stages. During stage 1, we identified common reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy through analysis of existing survey data, a rapid systematic literature review, and public engagement workshops. Stage 2 comprised qualitative interviews with medical, immunological, and public health experts. Rapid content and thematic analysis of the data provided evidence-based responses to common vaccine concerns. Stage 3 involved the development of therapeutic dialogues through workshops with psychological and digital behaviour change experts. Dialogues were developed to address concerns using MI principles, including embracing resistance and supporting self-efficacy. Finally, stage 4 involved digitisation of the dialogues and pilot testing with members of the public. 

Discussion: the digital intervention provides an evidence-based approach to addressing vaccine hesitancy through MI principles. The dialogues are user-selected, allowing exploration of relevant issues associated with hesitancy in a non-judgmental context. The text-based content and digital format allow for rapid modification to changing information and scalability for wider dissemination.

Text
Understanding_and_addressing_vaccine_hesitancy_... - Accepted Manuscript
Download (95kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 October 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 October 2021
Published date: 1 December 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. This report is independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research (ARC) Wessex. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: This work and the salary of KA were supported by the School of Primary Care Research [Grant Number 434 ]. JRM and HK receive salary support from a Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Fellowship [grant number MR/P008348/1 ]. Funding Information: We would like to thank all experts for their contributions to the expert interviews. This work was supported by the School of Primary Care Research [Grant Number 434 ] with in-kind support from the National Institute for Health Research ARC Wessex. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: COVID-19, Intervention, Motivational interviewing, Vaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453436
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453436
ISSN: 0033-3506
PURE UUID: 962da63d-fe01-4d47-ba50-0c782175257f
ORCID for Katherine Bradbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2022 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Holly Knight
Author: Kieran Ayling
Author: Katherine Baker
Author: Trudie Chalder
Author: J Morling
Author: L Durrant
Author: T Avery
Author: J Ball
Author: Caroline Barker
Author: R Bennett
Author: T McKeever
Author: Kavita Vedhara

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×