The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A guide to caesarean wound healing

A guide to caesarean wound healing
A guide to caesarean wound healing

This guide presents recommendations for midwives and obstetricians on the subject of wound healing; in relation to surgical site infections (SSI) post-caesarean section (CS) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for at-risk groups. Background It is well documented that there has been a steady growth in CS rates since the 1980s (Betrán et al, 2016), despite the World Health Organization's ([WHO], 2015) reiteration in 1985 of an 'ideal' CS rate globally of 10%–15%. Bragg et al (2010) asserts a CS increase in England from 9% in 1980 to 24.6% by 2008–2009. The National Maternity and Perinatal Audit ([NMPA], 2019) Project Team reports a birth rate of 700 000 during 2016–2017 in the NHS across England, Wales and Scotland, of which approximately 1 in 4 women were delivered by CS (Bhatia et al, 2021); a statistic reiterated within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ([NICE], (2021) caesarean birth guidance. The WHO (2015) affirms that when medically necessary, CS prevents maternal and newborn mortality (Boerma et al, 2018; Sandall et al, 2018). There are many speculated reasons for this increase, such as rising maternal age at first.

0969-4900
1-8
Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen
28b0a1aa-6f3c-4fed-bf0a-456fe5f5ca73
Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen
28b0a1aa-6f3c-4fed-bf0a-456fe5f5ca73

Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen (2021) A guide to caesarean wound healing. British Journal of Midwifery, 29 (Sup8a), 1-8. (doi:10.12968/bjom.2021.29.Sup8a.1).

Record type: Review

Abstract

This guide presents recommendations for midwives and obstetricians on the subject of wound healing; in relation to surgical site infections (SSI) post-caesarean section (CS) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for at-risk groups. Background It is well documented that there has been a steady growth in CS rates since the 1980s (Betrán et al, 2016), despite the World Health Organization's ([WHO], 2015) reiteration in 1985 of an 'ideal' CS rate globally of 10%–15%. Bragg et al (2010) asserts a CS increase in England from 9% in 1980 to 24.6% by 2008–2009. The National Maternity and Perinatal Audit ([NMPA], 2019) Project Team reports a birth rate of 700 000 during 2016–2017 in the NHS across England, Wales and Scotland, of which approximately 1 in 4 women were delivered by CS (Bhatia et al, 2021); a statistic reiterated within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ([NICE], (2021) caesarean birth guidance. The WHO (2015) affirms that when medically necessary, CS prevents maternal and newborn mortality (Boerma et al, 2018; Sandall et al, 2018). There are many speculated reasons for this increase, such as rising maternal age at first.

Text
bjm cs - Accepted Manuscript
Download (61kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 April 2021
Published date: 2 August 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453618
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453618
ISSN: 0969-4900
PURE UUID: 89c0602d-830b-4498-90d8-ca4c284530a1
ORCID for Ellen Kitson-Reynolds: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jan 2022 17:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×