The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

‘I'll put up with things for a long time before I need to call anybody’: face work, the Total Institution and the perpetuation of care inequalities

‘I'll put up with things for a long time before I need to call anybody’: face work, the Total Institution and the perpetuation of care inequalities
‘I'll put up with things for a long time before I need to call anybody’: face work, the Total Institution and the perpetuation of care inequalities

Failures in fundamental care (e.g. nutrition or pain-relief) for hospitalised patients can have serious consequences, including avoidable deaths. Policy rhetoric of ‘shared decision-making’ fails to consider how structural constraints and power dynamics limit patient agency in nursing staff-patient interactions. Goffman's concepts of face work, the presentation of self and the Total Institution shaped our analysis of interview and focus group data from hospital patients. Patients avoided threatening ‘good’ patient and staff face by only requesting missed care when staff face was convincing as ‘caring’ and ‘available’ (‘engaged’). Patients did not request care from ‘distracted’ staff (‘caring’ but not ‘available’), whilst patient requests were ignored in Total Institution-like ‘dismissive’ interactions. This meant patients experienced missed care with both ‘distracted’ and ‘dismissive’ staff. Patients with higher support needs were less able to carry out their own missed care to protect staff face, so experienced more serious care omissions. These findings show that many elements of the Total Institution survive in modern healthcare settings despite attempts to support individualised care. Unless nursing staff can maintain face as ‘engaged’ (despite organisational constraints that can reduce their capacity to do so) patient participation in care decisions will remain at the level of rhetoric.

Goffman, fundamental care, hospitals, missed care, nursing, patient experience, personalisation
0141-9889
469-487
Hope, Jo
5d49099e-13bc-49d2-88d8-48e1ec6d25fc
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Gould, Lisa
363cc1b3-078d-48eb-a164-feee7dcd9246
Bridges, Jackie
57e80ebe-ee5f-4219-9bbc-43215e8363cd
Hope, Jo
5d49099e-13bc-49d2-88d8-48e1ec6d25fc
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Gould, Lisa
363cc1b3-078d-48eb-a164-feee7dcd9246
Bridges, Jackie
57e80ebe-ee5f-4219-9bbc-43215e8363cd

Hope, Jo, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Griffiths, Peter, Gould, Lisa and Bridges, Jackie (2022) ‘I'll put up with things for a long time before I need to call anybody’: face work, the Total Institution and the perpetuation of care inequalities. Sociology of Health & Illness, 44 (2), 469-487. (doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13435).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Failures in fundamental care (e.g. nutrition or pain-relief) for hospitalised patients can have serious consequences, including avoidable deaths. Policy rhetoric of ‘shared decision-making’ fails to consider how structural constraints and power dynamics limit patient agency in nursing staff-patient interactions. Goffman's concepts of face work, the presentation of self and the Total Institution shaped our analysis of interview and focus group data from hospital patients. Patients avoided threatening ‘good’ patient and staff face by only requesting missed care when staff face was convincing as ‘caring’ and ‘available’ (‘engaged’). Patients did not request care from ‘distracted’ staff (‘caring’ but not ‘available’), whilst patient requests were ignored in Total Institution-like ‘dismissive’ interactions. This meant patients experienced missed care with both ‘distracted’ and ‘dismissive’ staff. Patients with higher support needs were less able to carry out their own missed care to protect staff face, so experienced more serious care omissions. These findings show that many elements of the Total Institution survive in modern healthcare settings despite attempts to support individualised care. Unless nursing staff can maintain face as ‘engaged’ (despite organisational constraints that can reduce their capacity to do so) patient participation in care decisions will remain at the level of rhetoric.

Text
I'll put up with things for a long time before I need to call anybody - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (121kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 January 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 January 2022
Published date: February 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: Thank you to the patients and staff who took part in our wider project. We’d also like to thank Jess Atkinson, our Patient and Public Involvement representative, for her advice during the project and feedback on early drafts and findings, and the members of Different Strokes Southampton, who gave us encouraging feedback on our initial findings. Finally thank you to the editors and anonymous reviewers who gave constructive and detailed feedback on this paper. This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Wessex. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: Thank you to the patients and staff who took part in our wider project. We?d also like to thank Jess Atkinson, our Patient and Public Involvement representative, for her advice during the project and feedback on early drafts and findings, and the members of Different Strokes Southampton, who gave us encouraging feedback on our initial findings. Finally thank you to the editors and anonymous reviewers who gave constructive and detailed feedback on this paper. This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Wessex. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL (SHIL).
Keywords: Goffman, fundamental care, hospitals, missed care, nursing, patient experience, personalisation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 454433
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454433
ISSN: 0141-9889
PURE UUID: a16ddebb-7366-4063-9dc4-ed42b8c5b7cf
ORCID for Jo Hope: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-7045
ORCID for Lisette Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766
ORCID for Peter Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-2857
ORCID for Jackie Bridges: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6776-736X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Feb 2022 17:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×