The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

BCIG Survey of the impact of COVID-19 on service delivery by cochlear implant teams in the UK and EIRE

BCIG Survey of the impact of COVID-19 on service delivery by cochlear implant teams in the UK and EIRE
BCIG Survey of the impact of COVID-19 on service delivery by cochlear implant teams in the UK and EIRE
Aim: the COVID-19 pandemic caused cochlear implant programmes to rapidly adapt their service delivery models. In recent years advances had been made in remote care approaches for assessment, rehabilitation and mapping. The BCIG conducted a survey to understand the impact that pandemic had on service delivery, to understand the benefits and limitations of the online resources and to explore the impact that these changes had on clinicians.

Methods: an online questionnaire was developed that was separated into: demographics, patient access approaches, repairs and equipment, approaches to tuning, rehabilitation, psychological support, medical emergencies, remote care resources and assessments. The questionnaire link was sent to coordinators and circulated to BCIG members.

Results: there were 52 respondents to the questionnaire representing 18 cochlear implant centres. For the clinics represented 66% were only open during the initial lockdown for emergencies and 92% had some staff in clinic everyday.
For repairs, the majority were dealt with by post but in-person and company repair schemes were essential parts of the service delivery. For those centres offering tuning services, the majority were carried out by post, but a mixture of remote programming, in-person, patient pick up were also offered. The delivery of rehabilitation proved to be possible using remote resources, either by video call or signposting individuals to helpful resources. This was in contrast to psychology services which were more difficult to deliver remotely. As expected, medical emergencies involved more in-person contact.
Of those individuals responding to the survey, 25% reported that during the pandemic that their sense of well being was quite low.

Conclusions: cochlear implant centres have responded effectively to changing their service delivery during the pandemic. They were able to benefit from the video conferencing systems that had been established and software that was available for rehabilitation services.
Clinicians requested that the BCIG helped to coordinate experiences across centres to develop a knowledge base of effective practice.

Cullington, Helen
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Vickers, Deborah
23453636-1d93-4fbf-9f01-00e85ea7c71c
Cullington, Helen
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Vickers, Deborah
23453636-1d93-4fbf-9f01-00e85ea7c71c

Cullington, Helen and Vickers, Deborah (2021) BCIG Survey of the impact of COVID-19 on service delivery by cochlear implant teams in the UK and EIRE. British Cochlear Implant Group, Online. 11 - 12 May 2021.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)

Abstract

Aim: the COVID-19 pandemic caused cochlear implant programmes to rapidly adapt their service delivery models. In recent years advances had been made in remote care approaches for assessment, rehabilitation and mapping. The BCIG conducted a survey to understand the impact that pandemic had on service delivery, to understand the benefits and limitations of the online resources and to explore the impact that these changes had on clinicians.

Methods: an online questionnaire was developed that was separated into: demographics, patient access approaches, repairs and equipment, approaches to tuning, rehabilitation, psychological support, medical emergencies, remote care resources and assessments. The questionnaire link was sent to coordinators and circulated to BCIG members.

Results: there were 52 respondents to the questionnaire representing 18 cochlear implant centres. For the clinics represented 66% were only open during the initial lockdown for emergencies and 92% had some staff in clinic everyday.
For repairs, the majority were dealt with by post but in-person and company repair schemes were essential parts of the service delivery. For those centres offering tuning services, the majority were carried out by post, but a mixture of remote programming, in-person, patient pick up were also offered. The delivery of rehabilitation proved to be possible using remote resources, either by video call or signposting individuals to helpful resources. This was in contrast to psychology services which were more difficult to deliver remotely. As expected, medical emergencies involved more in-person contact.
Of those individuals responding to the survey, 25% reported that during the pandemic that their sense of well being was quite low.

Conclusions: cochlear implant centres have responded effectively to changing their service delivery during the pandemic. They were able to benefit from the video conferencing systems that had been established and software that was available for rehabilitation services.
Clinicians requested that the BCIG helped to coordinate experiences across centres to develop a knowledge base of effective practice.

Text
BCIG survey of the impact of COVID - Cullington -USAIS - Author's Original
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 11 May 2021
Venue - Dates: British Cochlear Implant Group, Online, 2021-05-11 - 2021-05-12

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 454987
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454987
PURE UUID: 247c57cc-a96f-4f5f-a412-d7e062a88f52
ORCID for Helen Cullington: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-2020

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Mar 2022 17:35
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: Deborah Vickers

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×