The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Superior efficacy of midostaurin over cladribine in advanced systemic mastocytosis: a registry-based analysis

Superior efficacy of midostaurin over cladribine in advanced systemic mastocytosis: a registry-based analysis
Superior efficacy of midostaurin over cladribine in advanced systemic mastocytosis: a registry-based analysis
Purpose: on the basis of data from the German Registry on Disorders of Eosinophils and Mast Cells, we compared the efficacy of midostaurin and cladribine in patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM). Patients and methods: patients with AdvSM (n = 139) were treated with midostaurin only (n = 63, 45%), cladribine only (n = 23, 17%), or sequentially (midostaurin-cladribine, n = 30, 57%; cladribine-midostaurin, n = 23, 43%). Prognosis was assessed through the Mutation-Adjusted Risk Score (MARS). Besides the comparison of efficacy between midostaurin and cladribine on response (eg, organ dysfunction, bone marrow mast cell [MC] infiltration, and tryptase), overall survival (OS), and leukemia-free survival, we focused on the impact of treatment on involved non-MC lineages, for example, monocytes or eosinophils, and the KIT D816V expressed allele burden. Results: midostaurin only was superior to cladribine only with effects from responses on MC and non-MC lineages conferring on a significantly improved OS (median 4.2 v 1.9 years, P = .033) and leukemia-free survival (2.7 v 1.3 years, P = .044) on the basis of a propensity score–weighted analysis of parameters included in MARS. Midostaurin compensated the inferior efficacy of cladribine in first- and second-line treatment. On midostaurin in any line, response of eosinophilia did not improve its baseline adverse prognostic impact, whereas response of monocytosis proved to be a positive on-treatment parameter. Multivariable analysis allowed to establish three risk categories (low/intermediate/high) through the combination of MARS and the reduction of the KIT D816V expressed allele burden of ≥ 25% at month 6 (median OS not reached v 3.0 years v 1.0 year; P < .001). Conclusion: in this registry-based analysis, midostaurin revealed superior efficacy over cladribine in patients with AdvSM. In midostaurin-treated patients, the combination of baseline MARS and molecular response provided a compelling three-tier risk categorization (MARSv2.0) for OS.
0732-183X
1783-1794
Lübke, Johannes
aa66da00-2473-47f4-913c-f4601623ac0c
Schwaab, Juliana
d63ed545-a6fc-4815-ab86-f901e55c2a2f
Naumann, Nicole
43566136-d964-415e-be36-45aeb4f88965
Horny, Hans-peter
95077a3b-b869-49ba-a227-f88b2c0bad80
Weiß, Christel
1392ba2b-6f54-4475-b03f-457267fcd48a
Metzgeroth, Georgia
611ec46d-9a11-4e24-ae0f-5ac19dfd0237
Kreil, Sebastian
0544f9ab-4216-4a15-9247-144328487656
Cross, Nicholas C.p.
f87650da-b908-4a34-b31b-d62c5f186fe4
Sotlar, Karl
e3e96797-3fab-4c37-8728-7c77bb3ba389
Fabarius, Alice
5c31b1e0-c6da-49b8-843a-5b0ca736e5a2
Hofmann, Wolf-karsten
ab66838b-bf8c-4352-a0f0-3c8aafed2570
Valent, Peter
1f551798-afce-4de4-abed-9efd78bc2e8a
Gotlib, Jason
b9586ecc-826a-48aa-9a0d-32e871da28dd
Jawhar, Mohamad
a608a215-173b-47bd-89eb-a8de2fe595aa
Reiter, Andreas
ffa23e84-4a13-4cb5-aaf0-3fafe25dbede
Lübke, Johannes
aa66da00-2473-47f4-913c-f4601623ac0c
Schwaab, Juliana
d63ed545-a6fc-4815-ab86-f901e55c2a2f
Naumann, Nicole
43566136-d964-415e-be36-45aeb4f88965
Horny, Hans-peter
95077a3b-b869-49ba-a227-f88b2c0bad80
Weiß, Christel
1392ba2b-6f54-4475-b03f-457267fcd48a
Metzgeroth, Georgia
611ec46d-9a11-4e24-ae0f-5ac19dfd0237
Kreil, Sebastian
0544f9ab-4216-4a15-9247-144328487656
Cross, Nicholas C.p.
f87650da-b908-4a34-b31b-d62c5f186fe4
Sotlar, Karl
e3e96797-3fab-4c37-8728-7c77bb3ba389
Fabarius, Alice
5c31b1e0-c6da-49b8-843a-5b0ca736e5a2
Hofmann, Wolf-karsten
ab66838b-bf8c-4352-a0f0-3c8aafed2570
Valent, Peter
1f551798-afce-4de4-abed-9efd78bc2e8a
Gotlib, Jason
b9586ecc-826a-48aa-9a0d-32e871da28dd
Jawhar, Mohamad
a608a215-173b-47bd-89eb-a8de2fe595aa
Reiter, Andreas
ffa23e84-4a13-4cb5-aaf0-3fafe25dbede

Lübke, Johannes, Schwaab, Juliana, Naumann, Nicole, Horny, Hans-peter, Weiß, Christel, Metzgeroth, Georgia, Kreil, Sebastian, Cross, Nicholas C.p., Sotlar, Karl, Fabarius, Alice, Hofmann, Wolf-karsten, Valent, Peter, Gotlib, Jason, Jawhar, Mohamad and Reiter, Andreas (2022) Superior efficacy of midostaurin over cladribine in advanced systemic mastocytosis: a registry-based analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40 (16), 1783-1794. (doi:10.1200/JCO.21.01849).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: on the basis of data from the German Registry on Disorders of Eosinophils and Mast Cells, we compared the efficacy of midostaurin and cladribine in patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM). Patients and methods: patients with AdvSM (n = 139) were treated with midostaurin only (n = 63, 45%), cladribine only (n = 23, 17%), or sequentially (midostaurin-cladribine, n = 30, 57%; cladribine-midostaurin, n = 23, 43%). Prognosis was assessed through the Mutation-Adjusted Risk Score (MARS). Besides the comparison of efficacy between midostaurin and cladribine on response (eg, organ dysfunction, bone marrow mast cell [MC] infiltration, and tryptase), overall survival (OS), and leukemia-free survival, we focused on the impact of treatment on involved non-MC lineages, for example, monocytes or eosinophils, and the KIT D816V expressed allele burden. Results: midostaurin only was superior to cladribine only with effects from responses on MC and non-MC lineages conferring on a significantly improved OS (median 4.2 v 1.9 years, P = .033) and leukemia-free survival (2.7 v 1.3 years, P = .044) on the basis of a propensity score–weighted analysis of parameters included in MARS. Midostaurin compensated the inferior efficacy of cladribine in first- and second-line treatment. On midostaurin in any line, response of eosinophilia did not improve its baseline adverse prognostic impact, whereas response of monocytosis proved to be a positive on-treatment parameter. Multivariable analysis allowed to establish three risk categories (low/intermediate/high) through the combination of MARS and the reduction of the KIT D816V expressed allele burden of ≥ 25% at month 6 (median OS not reached v 3.0 years v 1.0 year; P < .001). Conclusion: in this registry-based analysis, midostaurin revealed superior efficacy over cladribine in patients with AdvSM. In midostaurin-treated patients, the combination of baseline MARS and molecular response provided a compelling three-tier risk categorization (MARSv2.0) for OS.

Text
Lubke - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
jco.21.01849 - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (542kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 February 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 March 2022
Published date: 1 June 2022
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 455726
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455726
ISSN: 0732-183X
PURE UUID: 686229c0-d367-4b04-8256-b8d0c667690c
ORCID for Nicholas C.p. Cross: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5481-2555

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2022 16:42
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Johannes Lübke
Author: Juliana Schwaab
Author: Nicole Naumann
Author: Hans-peter Horny
Author: Christel Weiß
Author: Georgia Metzgeroth
Author: Sebastian Kreil
Author: Karl Sotlar
Author: Alice Fabarius
Author: Wolf-karsten Hofmann
Author: Peter Valent
Author: Jason Gotlib
Author: Mohamad Jawhar
Author: Andreas Reiter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×