The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What happened to 'vivre ensemble?: developments after SAS v France

What happened to 'vivre ensemble?: developments after SAS v France
What happened to 'vivre ensemble?: developments after SAS v France
In 2014, the European Court of Human Rights found that France’s prohibition on women wearing the full face veil did not violate Art 9. In doing so, it accepted that the ban was necessary in order to achieve ‘vivre ensemble’ or ‘living together’. This hitherto unused concept was controversial and the response at the time was mostly critical. This article examines when and in what ways the Court has used vivre ensemble since that decision. It considers the arguments made by member states and applicants and the Court’s reasoning in later cases on the face veil and other Islamic clothing, as well examining reference to vivre ensemble by the Court in other contexts. It finds that the full face veil is constructed as fundamentally different to other forms of religious clothing and there is little reliance on the concept other than in the ‘burqa ban’ cases.
2047-0770
Pearson, Megan
fc57169e-5c44-405a-9d80-806ade39c1f2
Pearson, Megan
fc57169e-5c44-405a-9d80-806ade39c1f2

Pearson, Megan (2021) What happened to 'vivre ensemble?: developments after SAS v France. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. (doi:10.1093/ojlr/rwab017).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In 2014, the European Court of Human Rights found that France’s prohibition on women wearing the full face veil did not violate Art 9. In doing so, it accepted that the ban was necessary in order to achieve ‘vivre ensemble’ or ‘living together’. This hitherto unused concept was controversial and the response at the time was mostly critical. This article examines when and in what ways the Court has used vivre ensemble since that decision. It considers the arguments made by member states and applicants and the Court’s reasoning in later cases on the face veil and other Islamic clothing, as well examining reference to vivre ensemble by the Court in other contexts. It finds that the full face veil is constructed as fundamentally different to other forms of religious clothing and there is little reliance on the concept other than in the ‘burqa ban’ cases.

Text
What happened to ‘vivre ensemble OJLR - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (89kB)
Text
rwab017 (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (228kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 November 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 December 2021
Published date: 3 December 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 456245
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456245
ISSN: 2047-0770
PURE UUID: 7e37c80a-0ab7-414a-b183-2040dea21854
ORCID for Megan Pearson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5330-4812

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Apr 2022 21:24
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×