The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of railway track forms

Comparison of railway track forms
Comparison of railway track forms
Current forecasts suggest that the world’s total length of rail lines is expected to keep growing. Since maintenance takes a large portion of the railway budget, it is essential to evaluate the potential to improve performance by developing different and more efficiently shaped track forms. To put this research into context, the thesis begins with an introduction to the track system and the leading causes of maintenance. Existing and experimental track forms were reviewed, and areas of potential improvement were identified. An improved longitudinal bending stiffness and a more uniform pressure distribution which would prevent ballast migration were among areas that could be improved. Numerical tools were used to evaluate the performance of a newly proposed dog-bone shaped sleeper and different types of ladder tracks. The criteria for designing the sleeper and ladder track were obtained after performing a range of parametric studies which included the variation in geometry and support conditions. It was found that the bending stiffness of the track influenced its behaviour significantly compared to the shape of the sleeper in contact with ballast. The models were then extended to further investigate more specialised areas such as joints and a problematic zone such as mud pumping regions because the presence of such regions may sometimes be inevitable. Therefore, it was important to investigate how the track bending stiffness compensates at those regions. As expected, the comparison of the different track types showed that the slab track would perform better under all conditions than conventional or ladder track since it distributed load better and prevents impact to a higher degree at sudden variations of support stiffnesses due to its high bending stiffness.
University of Southampton
Rampat, Chandr Toshan
451de6b7-4597-4ac4-94ef-7bdf46beb575
Rampat, Chandr Toshan
451de6b7-4597-4ac4-94ef-7bdf46beb575
Powrie, William
600c3f02-00f8-4486-ae4b-b4fc8ec77c3c
Harkness, John
026f02e8-41d9-403f-83be-0d880058ecf1

Rampat, Chandr Toshan (2021) Comparison of railway track forms. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 212pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Current forecasts suggest that the world’s total length of rail lines is expected to keep growing. Since maintenance takes a large portion of the railway budget, it is essential to evaluate the potential to improve performance by developing different and more efficiently shaped track forms. To put this research into context, the thesis begins with an introduction to the track system and the leading causes of maintenance. Existing and experimental track forms were reviewed, and areas of potential improvement were identified. An improved longitudinal bending stiffness and a more uniform pressure distribution which would prevent ballast migration were among areas that could be improved. Numerical tools were used to evaluate the performance of a newly proposed dog-bone shaped sleeper and different types of ladder tracks. The criteria for designing the sleeper and ladder track were obtained after performing a range of parametric studies which included the variation in geometry and support conditions. It was found that the bending stiffness of the track influenced its behaviour significantly compared to the shape of the sleeper in contact with ballast. The models were then extended to further investigate more specialised areas such as joints and a problematic zone such as mud pumping regions because the presence of such regions may sometimes be inevitable. Therefore, it was important to investigate how the track bending stiffness compensates at those regions. As expected, the comparison of the different track types showed that the slab track would perform better under all conditions than conventional or ladder track since it distributed load better and prevents impact to a higher degree at sudden variations of support stiffnesses due to its high bending stiffness.

Text
thesis_full_corrections_deposit - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (13MB)
Text
permission_deposit
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: October 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 456512
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456512
PURE UUID: ff6a8e8d-5733-43bd-970f-a3e44988ae86
ORCID for Chandr Toshan Rampat: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7405-3952
ORCID for William Powrie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-0826
ORCID for John Harkness: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-0791

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 May 2022 17:01
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:52

Export record

Contributors

Author: Chandr Toshan Rampat ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: William Powrie ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: John Harkness ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×