The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Urological litigation trends in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of claims over 20 years

Urological litigation trends in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of claims over 20 years
Urological litigation trends in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of claims over 20 years
Objective: To look into the urology litigation trends and successful claims in the National Health Service (NHS) over the last 20 years.

Methods: We requested data from NHS Resolutions to investigate current litigation numbers, costs and causes for claims. Data collected included the number of claims dating from 1996 to 2019, the total sum of damages paid out each year for urology and the causes for the claims dating from 2009 to 2019. Data from NHS Resolutions were analysed, stratified and categorized by the authors from this information, which was provided as two separate documents.

Results: The total cost of damages between 1997 and 2017 was £74.5m (range: £241 325-£7.8m per year). While the number of successful claims was 1653 (range 7-168 per year), the total number of claims was 3341 (range 31-347 per year) and, over time, this has increased almost sevenfold. The cost of damages has increased roughly in line with the number of claims. Over the last 10 years, non-operative-related claims accounted for 984 claims, of which the largest subset was for 'the failure to diagnose and/or treat' (n = 639, 65%), with 88 (9%) successful consent-related claims. There were 226 intra-operative-related claims. Of these, wrong-site surgery, a never-event, accounted for eight claims and there were six successful claims for failing to supervise juniors. A total of 1129 claims were postoperative claims, with retained foreign body or instrument accounting for 71 (6%) of these.

Conclusions: The number and cost of litigation claims have increased year on year. There is a need for continual improvement in patient care, surgical training, counselling, informed consent and early management of complications. The evidence reviewed in this paper suggests that the best approach to this is the combination of rigid adherence to and re-enforcement of common surgical guidelines and implementation of the national 'Getting it right first time' initiative.

Keywords: #Urology; GIRFT; NHS resolutions; claim; compensation; complication; consent; litigation; medico-legal; urology.
1464-4096
361 - 365
Lane, Jenni
4eb0767e-2c72-4056-8782-aca62a322a8e
Bhome, Rahul
d7b1e0d3-5925-460a-871d-5f52f69c649b
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Lane, Jenni
4eb0767e-2c72-4056-8782-aca62a322a8e
Bhome, Rahul
d7b1e0d3-5925-460a-871d-5f52f69c649b
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9

Lane, Jenni, Bhome, Rahul and Somani, Bhaskar (2021) Urological litigation trends in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of claims over 20 years. BJU International, 128 (3), 361 - 365. (doi:10.1111/bju.15411).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: To look into the urology litigation trends and successful claims in the National Health Service (NHS) over the last 20 years.

Methods: We requested data from NHS Resolutions to investigate current litigation numbers, costs and causes for claims. Data collected included the number of claims dating from 1996 to 2019, the total sum of damages paid out each year for urology and the causes for the claims dating from 2009 to 2019. Data from NHS Resolutions were analysed, stratified and categorized by the authors from this information, which was provided as two separate documents.

Results: The total cost of damages between 1997 and 2017 was £74.5m (range: £241 325-£7.8m per year). While the number of successful claims was 1653 (range 7-168 per year), the total number of claims was 3341 (range 31-347 per year) and, over time, this has increased almost sevenfold. The cost of damages has increased roughly in line with the number of claims. Over the last 10 years, non-operative-related claims accounted for 984 claims, of which the largest subset was for 'the failure to diagnose and/or treat' (n = 639, 65%), with 88 (9%) successful consent-related claims. There were 226 intra-operative-related claims. Of these, wrong-site surgery, a never-event, accounted for eight claims and there were six successful claims for failing to supervise juniors. A total of 1129 claims were postoperative claims, with retained foreign body or instrument accounting for 71 (6%) of these.

Conclusions: The number and cost of litigation claims have increased year on year. There is a need for continual improvement in patient care, surgical training, counselling, informed consent and early management of complications. The evidence reviewed in this paper suggests that the best approach to this is the combination of rigid adherence to and re-enforcement of common surgical guidelines and implementation of the national 'Getting it right first time' initiative.

Keywords: #Urology; GIRFT; NHS resolutions; claim; compensation; complication; consent; litigation; medico-legal; urology.

Text
Urology litigation 29-Nov - Author's Original
Download (48kB)
Text
BJU International - 2021 - Lane - Urological litigation trends in the UK National Health Service an analysis of claims - Version of Record
Download (273kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 March 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 May 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 457994
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457994
ISSN: 1464-4096
PURE UUID: 9c704e13-2dc6-4a1f-beee-6a89fb18a737
ORCID for Rahul Bhome: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-4939

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jun 2022 18:23
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jenni Lane
Author: Rahul Bhome ORCID iD
Author: Bhaskar Somani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×