The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Current controversies in the literature on time inconsistency and monetary policy

Current controversies in the literature on time inconsistency and monetary policy
Current controversies in the literature on time inconsistency and monetary policy

I examine the importance of the inflationary basis of time consistent monetary policy by using an extended version of the simple Barro-Gordon framework featuring important aspects of actual policy making. The model developed provides a counterexample to the standard theory as it yields the result that a deflationary bias may be possible as well. I identify the rationale for this surprising result in the distortion caused by instrument uncertainty in the trade-off between the costs and benefits associated with surprisingly lower interest rates faced at the margin by the policy maker.

A key debate in monetary policy is that on the importance of following systematic behaviours. I revisit the debate on rules versus discretion focusing on the design of instrument rules in a manner that push discretionary policy choices in the direction of the commitment equilibrium. I demonstrate that an instrument rules with an optimal degree of monetary inertia may render negligible the inflationary bias associated with discretion without necessarily implying a trade-off between flexibility and commitment. In particular, I make a substantial contribution on the puzzling issue of the optimality of interest-rate smoothing by showing that gradualism may enhance credibility as it contrasts the incentive to exploit employment and output gains deriving from inflation surprises.

The real effectiveness of monetary delegation in overcoming the problem of time inconsistency has been recently questioned. Jensen has shown that optimal policy can be credible under delegation only if reappointment costs are prohibitive. Conversely I make evident that, when delegation is not considered as an alternative, but rather as supplementary, to reputation and is conducive to reputation building for the central banker, the circumstances under which optimal monetary delegation can be credible need not be so extreme.

University of Southampton
Rotondi, Zeno
0b11b824-ceb6-4392-b8f1-0ee03cd4f42a
Rotondi, Zeno
0b11b824-ceb6-4392-b8f1-0ee03cd4f42a

Rotondi, Zeno (2000) Current controversies in the literature on time inconsistency and monetary policy. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

I examine the importance of the inflationary basis of time consistent monetary policy by using an extended version of the simple Barro-Gordon framework featuring important aspects of actual policy making. The model developed provides a counterexample to the standard theory as it yields the result that a deflationary bias may be possible as well. I identify the rationale for this surprising result in the distortion caused by instrument uncertainty in the trade-off between the costs and benefits associated with surprisingly lower interest rates faced at the margin by the policy maker.

A key debate in monetary policy is that on the importance of following systematic behaviours. I revisit the debate on rules versus discretion focusing on the design of instrument rules in a manner that push discretionary policy choices in the direction of the commitment equilibrium. I demonstrate that an instrument rules with an optimal degree of monetary inertia may render negligible the inflationary bias associated with discretion without necessarily implying a trade-off between flexibility and commitment. In particular, I make a substantial contribution on the puzzling issue of the optimality of interest-rate smoothing by showing that gradualism may enhance credibility as it contrasts the incentive to exploit employment and output gains deriving from inflation surprises.

The real effectiveness of monetary delegation in overcoming the problem of time inconsistency has been recently questioned. Jensen has shown that optimal policy can be credible under delegation only if reappointment costs are prohibitive. Conversely I make evident that, when delegation is not considered as an alternative, but rather as supplementary, to reputation and is conducive to reputation building for the central banker, the circumstances under which optimal monetary delegation can be credible need not be so extreme.

Text
757221.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (4MB)

More information

Published date: 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 464179
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464179
PURE UUID: 87b6dd01-e6eb-4342-a782-274caa35bb05

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:26
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:19

Export record

Contributors

Author: Zeno Rotondi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×