The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Auditing of fluvial geomorphological processes for flood defence in the U.K. Environment Agency

Auditing of fluvial geomorphological processes for flood defence in the U.K. Environment Agency
Auditing of fluvial geomorphological processes for flood defence in the U.K. Environment Agency

This study reviews existing methods of geomorphological and engineering science / practice, with reference to flood defence application in general, and particularly in the U.K. Environment Agency. A new method of geomorphological audit is then developed tor application to flood defence maintenance in two case studies covering: the Shelf Brook, (which drains a small upland catchment near Glossop, Derbyshire), and the upper Mersey river system, (which drains a large part of the southern Pennines and northern Peak District). The global objectives of this exercise were to develop a method of rapid geomorphological catchment appraisal that was versatile and utilitarian. Versatility was defined in terms of) applicability to different physical habitats, catchment sizes, flood defence management objectives and flood defence scheme 'life-stages' (from feasility to post-project appraisal). Utility was defined as the demonstration of the audit's advantages over existing methods, the investigation of any additional data requirements for flood defence application (outside that collected by the audit), and the assessment of the tangibile benefits of the method verses its costs. Additionally a two year dataset of field geomorphological data were compiled to verify the findings of the audit as part of the first case study. This first study satisfied the global objectives in part, however, in reviewing the application of the audit methods a number of interim areas for expansion were also identified. These comprised: the need to apply the audit methods to a full catchment system of watercourses, the need to include areas of modified channel within the audit to make it more widely applicable, and the importance of looking at inter-observer variability. The question as to whether or not it was possible to reduce the coverage of an audit from 100% of catchment reaches to a sample of the total 'population' of reaches was raised. Additionally, the need to collect more data on the types of erosion and deposition occurring, and the causes of that erosion and deposition, was also identified. The second case study went on to address these expansion areas, in addition to the original global objectives. Conclusions were then drawn on the overall success of the audit methods developed through these two studies.

University of Southampton
Walker, Jim
887d666a-942e-4599-9a89-1bf0557d9e1d
Walker, Jim
887d666a-942e-4599-9a89-1bf0557d9e1d

Walker, Jim (2001) Auditing of fluvial geomorphological processes for flood defence in the U.K. Environment Agency. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This study reviews existing methods of geomorphological and engineering science / practice, with reference to flood defence application in general, and particularly in the U.K. Environment Agency. A new method of geomorphological audit is then developed tor application to flood defence maintenance in two case studies covering: the Shelf Brook, (which drains a small upland catchment near Glossop, Derbyshire), and the upper Mersey river system, (which drains a large part of the southern Pennines and northern Peak District). The global objectives of this exercise were to develop a method of rapid geomorphological catchment appraisal that was versatile and utilitarian. Versatility was defined in terms of) applicability to different physical habitats, catchment sizes, flood defence management objectives and flood defence scheme 'life-stages' (from feasility to post-project appraisal). Utility was defined as the demonstration of the audit's advantages over existing methods, the investigation of any additional data requirements for flood defence application (outside that collected by the audit), and the assessment of the tangibile benefits of the method verses its costs. Additionally a two year dataset of field geomorphological data were compiled to verify the findings of the audit as part of the first case study. This first study satisfied the global objectives in part, however, in reviewing the application of the audit methods a number of interim areas for expansion were also identified. These comprised: the need to apply the audit methods to a full catchment system of watercourses, the need to include areas of modified channel within the audit to make it more widely applicable, and the importance of looking at inter-observer variability. The question as to whether or not it was possible to reduce the coverage of an audit from 100% of catchment reaches to a sample of the total 'population' of reaches was raised. Additionally, the need to collect more data on the types of erosion and deposition occurring, and the causes of that erosion and deposition, was also identified. The second case study went on to address these expansion areas, in addition to the original global objectives. Conclusions were then drawn on the overall success of the audit methods developed through these two studies.

Text
788522.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (39MB)

More information

Published date: 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 464415
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464415
PURE UUID: a52b9fce-ec68-493e-bf8b-f05a6bab8e9b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 23:36
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:30

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jim Walker

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×