Why do bumblebee workers vary in size?
Why do bumblebee workers vary in size?
This thesis investigates size variation in the worker caste of social bumblebees (Bombus spp.) by examining various morphological and behavioural characteristics in relation to body size. I confirm size variation in the worker castes of 23 Bombus species and that foragers are, on average, larger than in-nest bees and that workers of pocket-making species vary more than pollen-storers. It is believed that larger bees are suited to foraging tasks and small bees to in-nest tasks, large bees being able to collect more forage per trip. I confirm that larger workers gather nectar more efficiently. Workers show behavioural plasticity: smaller workers occasionally forage and larger bees often perform in-nest tasks and are superior brood carers. By manipulating the worker size distributions in artificial nests, I show that a workforce of large bees is superior to one of the small workers in terms of colony growth. Larger workers are supposedly better adapted to colder conditions than smaller workers. I show that bumblebees from cold regions have longer thoracic setae than those from hot regions and that, within species, foraging workers of races from cooler regions are often found to be larger than those from warmer regions. I also show that, in southern England, ambient temperature has no influence on nectar foraging efficiency or on the size of forager, but that pollen foraging trips are made in warmer conditions. Bumblebees obtain from flowers. I show that different plant species attract foragers of different mean size, that larger bees have longer tongues and handle deeper flowers more quickly and shallower flowers more slowly than smaller workers. That size variation enables a colony to efficiently harvest nectar and pollen from a variety of floral resources is the most encouraging adaptive explanation for size variation in bumblebee workers thus far.
University of Southampton
Peat, James W
4f159f9d-9a3d-4600-89ff-bc0e3b4f7bdf
2004
Peat, James W
4f159f9d-9a3d-4600-89ff-bc0e3b4f7bdf
Peat, James W
(2004)
Why do bumblebee workers vary in size?
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis investigates size variation in the worker caste of social bumblebees (Bombus spp.) by examining various morphological and behavioural characteristics in relation to body size. I confirm size variation in the worker castes of 23 Bombus species and that foragers are, on average, larger than in-nest bees and that workers of pocket-making species vary more than pollen-storers. It is believed that larger bees are suited to foraging tasks and small bees to in-nest tasks, large bees being able to collect more forage per trip. I confirm that larger workers gather nectar more efficiently. Workers show behavioural plasticity: smaller workers occasionally forage and larger bees often perform in-nest tasks and are superior brood carers. By manipulating the worker size distributions in artificial nests, I show that a workforce of large bees is superior to one of the small workers in terms of colony growth. Larger workers are supposedly better adapted to colder conditions than smaller workers. I show that bumblebees from cold regions have longer thoracic setae than those from hot regions and that, within species, foraging workers of races from cooler regions are often found to be larger than those from warmer regions. I also show that, in southern England, ambient temperature has no influence on nectar foraging efficiency or on the size of forager, but that pollen foraging trips are made in warmer conditions. Bumblebees obtain from flowers. I show that different plant species attract foragers of different mean size, that larger bees have longer tongues and handle deeper flowers more quickly and shallower flowers more slowly than smaller workers. That size variation enables a colony to efficiently harvest nectar and pollen from a variety of floral resources is the most encouraging adaptive explanation for size variation in bumblebee workers thus far.
Text
962341.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 465487
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465487
PURE UUID: dd1dc154-c673-4d36-8fb9-1dcc06caa4a7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 01:22
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:12
Export record
Contributors
Author:
James W Peat
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics