The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Transitions, change and identity : the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of Vasco-Cantabrian Spain

Transitions, change and identity : the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of Vasco-Cantabrian Spain
Transitions, change and identity : the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of Vasco-Cantabrian Spain

Current thinking in the Palaeolithic divides the archaeological record into a succession of discrete ‘cultures’ defined in terms of lithic industries, thus creating ‘points’ of ‘transition’.  At the infamous ‘Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition’ the problems of this approach are exacerbated because the transition being debated is central to our own identity and thus has a long history which strongly influences our current thinking about the ‘nature’ of humanity.  As the ‘transition’ from animal to human, Neanderthal to ‘modern’ is seen as being both behavioural and biological, differences in the archaeological record have been explained away as caused by ‘evolution’, applied in a simplistic post hoc, accommodative way.

This ‘top-down’ perspective assumes qualitative differences between Neanderthals and ‘modern’ humans, particularly in terms of their mental abilities regarding abstract through and the ability to structure or ‘design’ activities that occur at some distance in time and/or space.  Such assumptions are dangerous in the limitations that they place on the interpretation of the record - hominids, sites, industries, etc., can only ever be ‘modern’ or ‘non-modern’, which both categories pre-defined and pre-‘explained’.  In this thesis I argue that, rather than assuming such difference, ‘bottom-up’ approaches need to be developed to reconsider the archaeological record of the ‘transition’ in terms of people, movement and activity. 

I argue that both hominid and human populations were inevitably immersed within a four-dimensional world as a fundamental fact of their existence and that, crucially, these ecosystems are not individual and discrete but are inescapably shared with other ‘persons’, whether these are hominid or human, animal, mineral or vegetable, with whom we interact on a daily basis.  Thus the archaeological record represents four-dimensional structures of peoples’ habitual, daily activities, comprised of movement and interaction within a four-dimensional ecosystem: the constitutve parts of identity and personhood.

University of Southampton
Coward, Fiona Susan
47e07be0-77e1-4b01-b4d8-129933b32f84
Coward, Fiona Susan
47e07be0-77e1-4b01-b4d8-129933b32f84

Coward, Fiona Susan (2004) Transitions, change and identity : the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of Vasco-Cantabrian Spain. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Current thinking in the Palaeolithic divides the archaeological record into a succession of discrete ‘cultures’ defined in terms of lithic industries, thus creating ‘points’ of ‘transition’.  At the infamous ‘Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition’ the problems of this approach are exacerbated because the transition being debated is central to our own identity and thus has a long history which strongly influences our current thinking about the ‘nature’ of humanity.  As the ‘transition’ from animal to human, Neanderthal to ‘modern’ is seen as being both behavioural and biological, differences in the archaeological record have been explained away as caused by ‘evolution’, applied in a simplistic post hoc, accommodative way.

This ‘top-down’ perspective assumes qualitative differences between Neanderthals and ‘modern’ humans, particularly in terms of their mental abilities regarding abstract through and the ability to structure or ‘design’ activities that occur at some distance in time and/or space.  Such assumptions are dangerous in the limitations that they place on the interpretation of the record - hominids, sites, industries, etc., can only ever be ‘modern’ or ‘non-modern’, which both categories pre-defined and pre-‘explained’.  In this thesis I argue that, rather than assuming such difference, ‘bottom-up’ approaches need to be developed to reconsider the archaeological record of the ‘transition’ in terms of people, movement and activity. 

I argue that both hominid and human populations were inevitably immersed within a four-dimensional world as a fundamental fact of their existence and that, crucially, these ecosystems are not individual and discrete but are inescapably shared with other ‘persons’, whether these are hominid or human, animal, mineral or vegetable, with whom we interact on a daily basis.  Thus the archaeological record represents four-dimensional structures of peoples’ habitual, daily activities, comprised of movement and interaction within a four-dimensional ecosystem: the constitutve parts of identity and personhood.

Text
970397.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (65MB)
Archive
970397_data.zip - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (7MB)

More information

Published date: 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 465519
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465519
PURE UUID: f147ebb5-0154-4f47-8f88-7239006d68d4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 01:33
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:13

Export record

Contributors

Author: Fiona Susan Coward

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×