A scoping review of nutritional interventions and policy guidelines in the interconception period for prevention of non-communicable diseases
A scoping review of nutritional interventions and policy guidelines in the interconception period for prevention of non-communicable diseases
Introduction
The interconception period is considered a time when parents are likely to engage with health messages and are in frequent contact with healthcare professionals. Through this scoping review and policy analysis, we synthesized articles and guidelines on interconception care to provide recommendations to improve health outcomes for parents, infants and future generations.
Methods
Four databases were searched systematically, using Medical Subject Headings and free-text terms based on ‘interconception’ and ‘postpartum.’ Selected articles included systematic reviews, pilot studies and guidelines on interconception and postpartum interventions published globally and in English by UK public health organizations and government agencies between 1 January 2010 and 12 January 2021. Thirty percent of titles, abstracts and full-text papers were double-screened. The description table of identified guidelines was used as a template to qualitatively generate key categories, which later developed into a framework of six domains. Findings are described using a narrative synthesis approach.
Results
We found 47 documents with guidelines, 29 systematic reviews and 6 pilot studies on interconception and postpartum care. Six domains were generated as follows: interconception care, nutrition-specific, nutrition-sensitive, personal-centred care, health professional, and multistakeholder approach. Interconception care opportunities include the postpartum period, family planning, routine practice and risk assessments. Health and nonhealthcare professionals with roles to play in the interconception period include general pratitioners, health visitors, dieticians, nutritionists, health psychologists, community groups, local authorities and charities such as Tommy's and First Step Nutrition.
Conclusions
The interconception and postpartum periods offer crucial opportunities to intervene, to reduce possible long-term effects of suboptimal nutrition. Although the policy analysis for this scoping review focused on the United Kingdom, the literature review had a global focus and the recommendations can have wider implications for other countries.
Watson, Daniella
26005c9f-779f-407b-b7e4-b7c9b812b6be
Jacob, Chandni Maria
f72c15ac-ef6b-4144-95b3-31194541fe00
Giles, Gareth
6dc40a9c-0ca5-4efd-a18c-03b8c223dab3
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
7249c538-46ab-4377-95f4-c546bf416487
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Hanson, Mark
1952fad1-abc7-4284-a0bc-a7eb31f70a3f
Watson, Daniella
26005c9f-779f-407b-b7e4-b7c9b812b6be
Jacob, Chandni Maria
f72c15ac-ef6b-4144-95b3-31194541fe00
Giles, Gareth
6dc40a9c-0ca5-4efd-a18c-03b8c223dab3
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
7249c538-46ab-4377-95f4-c546bf416487
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Hanson, Mark
1952fad1-abc7-4284-a0bc-a7eb31f70a3f
Watson, Daniella, Jacob, Chandni Maria, Giles, Gareth, McAuliffe, Fionnuala M., Godfrey, Keith and Hanson, Mark
(2022)
A scoping review of nutritional interventions and policy guidelines in the interconception period for prevention of non-communicable diseases.
Reproductive, Female & Child Health.
(doi:10.1002/rfc2.8).
Abstract
Introduction
The interconception period is considered a time when parents are likely to engage with health messages and are in frequent contact with healthcare professionals. Through this scoping review and policy analysis, we synthesized articles and guidelines on interconception care to provide recommendations to improve health outcomes for parents, infants and future generations.
Methods
Four databases were searched systematically, using Medical Subject Headings and free-text terms based on ‘interconception’ and ‘postpartum.’ Selected articles included systematic reviews, pilot studies and guidelines on interconception and postpartum interventions published globally and in English by UK public health organizations and government agencies between 1 January 2010 and 12 January 2021. Thirty percent of titles, abstracts and full-text papers were double-screened. The description table of identified guidelines was used as a template to qualitatively generate key categories, which later developed into a framework of six domains. Findings are described using a narrative synthesis approach.
Results
We found 47 documents with guidelines, 29 systematic reviews and 6 pilot studies on interconception and postpartum care. Six domains were generated as follows: interconception care, nutrition-specific, nutrition-sensitive, personal-centred care, health professional, and multistakeholder approach. Interconception care opportunities include the postpartum period, family planning, routine practice and risk assessments. Health and nonhealthcare professionals with roles to play in the interconception period include general pratitioners, health visitors, dieticians, nutritionists, health psychologists, community groups, local authorities and charities such as Tommy's and First Step Nutrition.
Conclusions
The interconception and postpartum periods offer crucial opportunities to intervene, to reduce possible long-term effects of suboptimal nutrition. Although the policy analysis for this scoping review focused on the United Kingdom, the literature review had a global focus and the recommendations can have wider implications for other countries.
Text
Interconception paper revised final_RFCH v1
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 June 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 July 2022
Additional Information:
This project was supported by The RANK Foundation and Public Policy Southampton. Keith Godfrey is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12011/4), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Senior Investigator (NF-SI-0515-10042) and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215-20004)), the European Union (Erasmus + Programme ImpENSA 598488-EPP-1-2018-1-DE-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP). Keith Godfrey and Mark Hanson are supported by the British Heart Foundation (RG/15/17/3174, SP/F/21/150013). Mark Hanson is also supported by the National Institute for Health Research, UK, through the Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, and Chandni M. Jacob is supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 LifeCycle Project under grant agreement number 733206. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 467355
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467355
PURE UUID: 02448562-4ad6-44cc-a581-34e0e4041fdc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jul 2022 17:20
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:22
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Fionnuala M. McAuliffe
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics