FAME3: good science, bad reception?

Curzen, Nicholas (2022) FAME3: good science, bad reception? Circulation Research, 118 (15), e103-e104. (doi:10.1093/cvr/cvac156).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: N.C. was an investigator in FAME 3; Chief Investigator for RIPCORD2 and FORECAST trials.

Text

curzen FAME3 commentary REVISION 23 8 22 - Accepted Manuscript

Download (31kB)

Accepted/In Press date: 24 August 2022

e-pub ahead of print date: 1 November 2022

Local EPrints ID: 469747

URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469747

ISSN: 0009-7330

PURE UUID: 23ff0df4-6239-4974-8cca-cbe2e6f93477

ORCID for Nicholas Curzen:

orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Date deposited: 23 Sep 2022 17:14

Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:29

Author: Nicholas Curzen

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.