The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A Millian case for censoring vaccine misinformation

A Millian case for censoring vaccine misinformation
A Millian case for censoring vaccine misinformation
The spread of vaccine misinformation may contribute to vaccine refusal/hesitancy and consequent harms. Nonetheless, censorship is often rejected on the grounds of free expression. This article examines John Stuart Mill’s influential defence of free expression, but finds that his arguments for freedom apply only to normal, reasonably favourable circumstances. In other cases, it may be permissible to restrict freedom, including freedom of speech. Thus, while Mill would ordinarily defend the right to express false views, such as that vaccines cause autism, he might have accepted restrictions on anti-vaccine misinformation during the present pandemic. This illustrates that even the staunchest defenders of free speech can permit temporary restrictions in exceptional circumstances.
Censorship, COVID-19, Free speech, J.S. Mill, Misinformation, Vaccines
1176-7529
115–124
Saunders, Ben
aed7ba9f-f519-4bbf-a554-db25b684037d
Saunders, Ben
aed7ba9f-f519-4bbf-a554-db25b684037d

Saunders, Ben (2023) A Millian case for censoring vaccine misinformation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 20 (1), 115–124. (doi:10.1007/s11673-022-10226-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The spread of vaccine misinformation may contribute to vaccine refusal/hesitancy and consequent harms. Nonetheless, censorship is often rejected on the grounds of free expression. This article examines John Stuart Mill’s influential defence of free expression, but finds that his arguments for freedom apply only to normal, reasonably favourable circumstances. In other cases, it may be permissible to restrict freedom, including freedom of speech. Thus, while Mill would ordinarily defend the right to express false views, such as that vaccines cause autism, he might have accepted restrictions on anti-vaccine misinformation during the present pandemic. This illustrates that even the staunchest defenders of free speech can permit temporary restrictions in exceptional circumstances.

Text
JBI R&R formatted Mill vaccines censorship - Accepted Manuscript
Download (46kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 January 2023
Published date: March 2023
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
Keywords: Censorship, COVID-19, Free speech, J.S. Mill, Misinformation, Vaccines

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470002
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470002
ISSN: 1176-7529
PURE UUID: 4fcfaa08-b28c-473e-b1b3-3a1976231cb5
ORCID for Ben Saunders: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-6397

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Sep 2022 17:02
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×