The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Quantifying unintended effects of an agroecological research project on farmers’ practices and social network in Papua New Guinea

Quantifying unintended effects of an agroecological research project on farmers’ practices and social network in Papua New Guinea
Quantifying unintended effects of an agroecological research project on farmers’ practices and social network in Papua New Guinea
1.Agroecological researchers and advocates often make assumptions about the social impact and dissemination of their work: researchers may assume that their work has impact through post-research dissemination, while advocates may assume that new agroecological practices can be effectively spread through existing social networks.

2.Here we test these assumptions by quantifying the effects of an agroecological research project on farming practices and the social network in a village community in Papua New Guinea. The project aimed to test the effect of applying banana peel compost, chicken manure and NPK fertiliser on sweet potato yields. Local farmers were involved in the research as project garden owners or research assistants. Using stochastic actor-oriented modelling, we tracked changes in farming practices and the social network.

3.Over the course of the research project, more people started to use food waste on their farms, while animal manure and NPK fertiliser were not frequently adopted. Farmers also took up practices that were not directly researched, such as mulching and planting the specific variety of sweet potato that was used in the project. This suggests that local farmers created meaning from the project, despite the researchers not intending to give advice until the end of the project.

4.The research project also affected the community’s social network. Research assistants became more often sought-after for advice, while knowledge about the project did not flow far from those directly involved. These results indicate that who gets involved in a project may have social consequences, and show the importance of understanding existing social networks before they are relied upon for spreading farming practices.

5.Overall, this work challenges often-held assumptions about the social impact and dissemination of agroecological research, provides insights into the types of agricultural innovations more likely to be accepted among farmers, and explores how new practices may most effectively be promoted within a community.
2575-8314
1592-1602
Hazenbosch, Mirjam
07149d5b-2ecc-459b-ba88-ceab094c0013
Sui, Shen
449c3d52-1402-4b7b-a653-3a7434184a14
Isua, Brus
31d8c859-9ab0-4c5f-ba22-97fa2f02999f
Beauchamp, Emilie
6d51d351-782e-4a5f-8649-e75eb711e79a
Kik, Alfred
beae9eb9-1691-4f9b-8d8b-176c358eff20
Luke, Grace
a4e09944-eebe-4be5-b61d-5ac30382af81
Matouš, Petr
f46351ab-bc28-4d1f-bdc6-55dae5311e11
Morris, Rebecca J
f63d9be3-e08f-4251-b6a0-43b312d3997e
Paliau, Jason
c9bae7f3-b495-4060-8655-53c1bcaefdf1
Milner Gulland, E.J.
df4e9454-0517-43ec-9c70-c2e78ee52077
Hazenbosch, Mirjam
07149d5b-2ecc-459b-ba88-ceab094c0013
Sui, Shen
449c3d52-1402-4b7b-a653-3a7434184a14
Isua, Brus
31d8c859-9ab0-4c5f-ba22-97fa2f02999f
Beauchamp, Emilie
6d51d351-782e-4a5f-8649-e75eb711e79a
Kik, Alfred
beae9eb9-1691-4f9b-8d8b-176c358eff20
Luke, Grace
a4e09944-eebe-4be5-b61d-5ac30382af81
Matouš, Petr
f46351ab-bc28-4d1f-bdc6-55dae5311e11
Morris, Rebecca J
f63d9be3-e08f-4251-b6a0-43b312d3997e
Paliau, Jason
c9bae7f3-b495-4060-8655-53c1bcaefdf1
Milner Gulland, E.J.
df4e9454-0517-43ec-9c70-c2e78ee52077

Hazenbosch, Mirjam, Sui, Shen, Isua, Brus, Beauchamp, Emilie, Kik, Alfred, Luke, Grace, Matouš, Petr, Morris, Rebecca J, Paliau, Jason and Milner Gulland, E.J. (2022) Quantifying unintended effects of an agroecological research project on farmers’ practices and social network in Papua New Guinea. People and Nature, 4 (6), 1592-1602. (doi:10.1002/pan3.10404).

Record type: Article

Abstract

1.Agroecological researchers and advocates often make assumptions about the social impact and dissemination of their work: researchers may assume that their work has impact through post-research dissemination, while advocates may assume that new agroecological practices can be effectively spread through existing social networks.

2.Here we test these assumptions by quantifying the effects of an agroecological research project on farming practices and the social network in a village community in Papua New Guinea. The project aimed to test the effect of applying banana peel compost, chicken manure and NPK fertiliser on sweet potato yields. Local farmers were involved in the research as project garden owners or research assistants. Using stochastic actor-oriented modelling, we tracked changes in farming practices and the social network.

3.Over the course of the research project, more people started to use food waste on their farms, while animal manure and NPK fertiliser were not frequently adopted. Farmers also took up practices that were not directly researched, such as mulching and planting the specific variety of sweet potato that was used in the project. This suggests that local farmers created meaning from the project, despite the researchers not intending to give advice until the end of the project.

4.The research project also affected the community’s social network. Research assistants became more often sought-after for advice, while knowledge about the project did not flow far from those directly involved. These results indicate that who gets involved in a project may have social consequences, and show the importance of understanding existing social networks before they are relied upon for spreading farming practices.

5.Overall, this work challenges often-held assumptions about the social impact and dissemination of agroecological research, provides insights into the types of agricultural innovations more likely to be accepted among farmers, and explores how new practices may most effectively be promoted within a community.

Text
Hazenbosch et al. 2022_Social network _People and Nature_Author Accepted Version - Accepted Manuscript
Download (158kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 8 September 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 November 2022
Published date: 5 December 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 470555
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/470555
ISSN: 2575-8314
PURE UUID: 0becf6ad-67c9-43ed-b381-b485a4a0e130
ORCID for Rebecca J Morris: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0020-5327

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Oct 2022 16:56
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mirjam Hazenbosch
Author: Shen Sui
Author: Brus Isua
Author: Emilie Beauchamp
Author: Alfred Kik
Author: Grace Luke
Author: Petr Matouš
Author: Jason Paliau
Author: E.J. Milner Gulland

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×