The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Robustness under parameter and problem domain alterations of Bayesian optimization methods for chemical reactions

Robustness under parameter and problem domain alterations of Bayesian optimization methods for chemical reactions
Robustness under parameter and problem domain alterations of Bayesian optimization methods for chemical reactions

The related problems of chemical reaction optimization and reaction scope search concern the discovery of reaction pathways and conditions that provide the best percentage yield of a target product. The space of possible reaction pathways or conditions is too large to search in full, so identifying a globally optimal set of conditions must instead draw on mathematical methods to identify areas of the space that should be investigated. An intriguing contribution to this area of research is the recent development of the Experimental Design for Bayesian optimization (EDBO) optimizer [1]. Bayesian optimization works by building an approximation to the true function to be optimized based on a small set of simulations, and selecting the next point (or points) to be tested based on an acquisition function reflecting the value of different points within the input space. In this work, we evaluated the robustness of the EDBO optimizer under several changes to its specification. We investigated the effect on the performance of the optimizer of altering the acquisition function and batch size, applied the method to other existing reaction yield data sets, and considered its performance in the new problem domain of molecular power conversion efficiency in photovoltaic cells. Our results indicated that the EDBO optimizer broadly performs well under these changes; of particular note is the competitive performance of the computationally cheaper acquisition function Thompson Sampling when compared to the original Expected Improvement function, and some concerns around the method’s performance for “incomplete” input domains.

Bayesian optimisation, Reaction optimisation, Reaction optimization, Bayesian optimization
1758-2946
Khondaker, Rubaiyat
55874aa9-77b1-450a-9908-b3db85f65869
Gow, Stephen
922171a1-6d31-4969-9e2e-8443daff9c0c
Kanza, Samantha
b73bcf34-3ff8-4691-bd09-aa657dcff420
Frey, Jeremy G.
ba60c559-c4af-44f1-87e6-ce69819bf23f
Niranjan, Mahesan
5cbaeea8-7288-4b55-a89c-c43d212ddd4f
Khondaker, Rubaiyat
55874aa9-77b1-450a-9908-b3db85f65869
Gow, Stephen
922171a1-6d31-4969-9e2e-8443daff9c0c
Kanza, Samantha
b73bcf34-3ff8-4691-bd09-aa657dcff420
Frey, Jeremy G.
ba60c559-c4af-44f1-87e6-ce69819bf23f
Niranjan, Mahesan
5cbaeea8-7288-4b55-a89c-c43d212ddd4f

Khondaker, Rubaiyat, Gow, Stephen, Kanza, Samantha, Frey, Jeremy G. and Niranjan, Mahesan (2022) Robustness under parameter and problem domain alterations of Bayesian optimization methods for chemical reactions. Journal of Cheminformatics, 14 (59), [59]. (doi:10.1186/s13321-022-00641-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The related problems of chemical reaction optimization and reaction scope search concern the discovery of reaction pathways and conditions that provide the best percentage yield of a target product. The space of possible reaction pathways or conditions is too large to search in full, so identifying a globally optimal set of conditions must instead draw on mathematical methods to identify areas of the space that should be investigated. An intriguing contribution to this area of research is the recent development of the Experimental Design for Bayesian optimization (EDBO) optimizer [1]. Bayesian optimization works by building an approximation to the true function to be optimized based on a small set of simulations, and selecting the next point (or points) to be tested based on an acquisition function reflecting the value of different points within the input space. In this work, we evaluated the robustness of the EDBO optimizer under several changes to its specification. We investigated the effect on the performance of the optimizer of altering the acquisition function and batch size, applied the method to other existing reaction yield data sets, and considered its performance in the new problem domain of molecular power conversion efficiency in photovoltaic cells. Our results indicated that the EDBO optimizer broadly performs well under these changes; of particular note is the competitive performance of the computationally cheaper acquisition function Thompson Sampling when compared to the original Expected Improvement function, and some concerns around the method’s performance for “incomplete” input domains.

Text
Robustness under parameter and problem domain alterations of Bayesian optimization methods for chemical reactions - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (837kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 August 2022
Published date: 1 September 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: This work was supported by the AI for Scientific Discovery Network, funded by UKRI EPSRC under Grant no: EP/S000356/1. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).
Keywords: Bayesian optimisation, Reaction optimisation, Reaction optimization, Bayesian optimization

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 471065
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471065
ISSN: 1758-2946
PURE UUID: 96a37e55-8e21-4b19-a7e8-312a862a2667
ORCID for Stephen Gow: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0121-1697
ORCID for Samantha Kanza: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-9489
ORCID for Jeremy G. Frey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0842-4302
ORCID for Mahesan Niranjan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-140X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Oct 2022 16:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rubaiyat Khondaker
Author: Stephen Gow ORCID iD
Author: Samantha Kanza ORCID iD
Author: Jeremy G. Frey ORCID iD
Author: Mahesan Niranjan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×