The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Infrastructure challenges to doing health research “where populations with the most disease live” in Covid times—a response to Rai et al. (2021)

Infrastructure challenges to doing health research “where populations with the most disease live” in Covid times—a response to Rai et al. (2021)
Infrastructure challenges to doing health research “where populations with the most disease live” in Covid times—a response to Rai et al. (2021)
Background: The failure of randomised controlled trials to adequately reflect areas of highest health need have been repeatedly highlighted. This has implications for the validity and generalisability of findings, for equity and efficiency, but also for research capacity-building. Rai et al. (BMC Med Res Method: ol 21:80, 2021) recently argued that the poor alignment between UK clinical research activity (specifically multi-centre RCTs) and local prevalence of disease was, in part, the outcome of behaviour and decision-making by Chief Investigators involved in trial research. They argued that a shift in research culture was needed. Following our recent multi-site mixed methods evaluative study about NHS 111 online we identify some of the additional structural barriers to delivering health research “where populations with the most disease live”, accounting for the Covid-19 disruption to processes and delivery. Methods: The NHS 111 study used a mixed-method research design, including interviews with healthcare staff and stakeholders within the primary, urgent and emergency health care system, and a survey of users and potential users of the NHS 111 online service. This paper draws on data collated by the research team during site identification and selection, as we followed an action research cycle of planning, action, observation and refection. The process results were discussed among the authors, and grouped into the two themes presented. Results: We approached 22 primary and secondary care sites across England, successfully recruiting half of these. Time from initial approach to first participant recruitment in successful sites ranged from one to ten months. This paper describes frontline bureaucratic barriers to research delivery and recruitment in the local Clinical Research Network system and secondary care sites carrying large research portfolios, alongside the adaptive practices of research practitioners that mitigate these. Conclusions: This paper augments the recommendations of Rai et al., describing delays encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic, and suggesting in addition to cultural change, it may be additionally important to dismantle infrastructural barriers and improve support to research teams so they can conduct health research “where populations with the most disease live”.
Barriers to research, Case study, Health need
1471-2288
Maclellan, Jennifer
2035484c-7514-4a4b-9ad4-ef8e3fdc95e9
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Maclellan, Jennifer
2035484c-7514-4a4b-9ad4-ef8e3fdc95e9
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607

Maclellan, Jennifer, Turnbull, Joanne and Pope, Catherine (2022) Infrastructure challenges to doing health research “where populations with the most disease live” in Covid times—a response to Rai et al. (2021). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22 (1), [265]. (doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01737-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The failure of randomised controlled trials to adequately reflect areas of highest health need have been repeatedly highlighted. This has implications for the validity and generalisability of findings, for equity and efficiency, but also for research capacity-building. Rai et al. (BMC Med Res Method: ol 21:80, 2021) recently argued that the poor alignment between UK clinical research activity (specifically multi-centre RCTs) and local prevalence of disease was, in part, the outcome of behaviour and decision-making by Chief Investigators involved in trial research. They argued that a shift in research culture was needed. Following our recent multi-site mixed methods evaluative study about NHS 111 online we identify some of the additional structural barriers to delivering health research “where populations with the most disease live”, accounting for the Covid-19 disruption to processes and delivery. Methods: The NHS 111 study used a mixed-method research design, including interviews with healthcare staff and stakeholders within the primary, urgent and emergency health care system, and a survey of users and potential users of the NHS 111 online service. This paper draws on data collated by the research team during site identification and selection, as we followed an action research cycle of planning, action, observation and refection. The process results were discussed among the authors, and grouped into the two themes presented. Results: We approached 22 primary and secondary care sites across England, successfully recruiting half of these. Time from initial approach to first participant recruitment in successful sites ranged from one to ten months. This paper describes frontline bureaucratic barriers to research delivery and recruitment in the local Clinical Research Network system and secondary care sites carrying large research portfolios, alongside the adaptive practices of research practitioners that mitigate these. Conclusions: This paper augments the recommendations of Rai et al., describing delays encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic, and suggesting in addition to cultural change, it may be additionally important to dismantle infrastructural barriers and improve support to research teams so they can conduct health research “where populations with the most disease live”.

Text
Infrastructure challenges to doing health research - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (100kB)
Text
s12874-022-01737-z - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 September 2022
Published date: 8 October 2022
Additional Information: © 2022. The Author(s).
Keywords: Barriers to research, Case study, Health need

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 471516
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/471516
ISSN: 1471-2288
PURE UUID: 1b2c6624-da81-4b36-986c-9e47ed5e6169
ORCID for Joanne Turnbull: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-4438
ORCID for Catherine Pope: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-6702

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Nov 2022 18:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jennifer Maclellan
Author: Joanne Turnbull ORCID iD
Author: Catherine Pope ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×