Measuring market integration during crisis periods
Measuring market integration during crisis periods
Pukthuanthong and Roll (2009) measure the degree of market integration by the percentage of a market’s returns explained by global risk factors. However, during periods of crisis characterised by high volatility, their measure may be biased. This paper investigates the determinants of the explanatory power in a multi-factor model during global crises. We show that the explanatory power is influenced by factor heteroscedasticity, changes in factor loadings and residual heteroscedasticity. Using a counterfactual analysis, we establish an empirical framework to examine the effects of each element on integration for 53 financial markets during six recent crisis periods. We find the unconditional market integration is much lower for most markets during a period of crisis than implied. Both factor heteroscedasticity and the existence of contagion during crises account for this difference.
Contagion, Factor heteroscedasticity, Financial crisis, Market integration
Qin, Weiping
3e8d75f0-72bb-4ac5-8301-51633cc0eb16
Cho, Sungjun
9f1da7dd-769b-40d2-826d-06d4da3f5399
Hyde, Stuart
250c8794-2190-4b3e-83c6-7c6f40698d72
1 May 2022
Qin, Weiping
3e8d75f0-72bb-4ac5-8301-51633cc0eb16
Cho, Sungjun
9f1da7dd-769b-40d2-826d-06d4da3f5399
Hyde, Stuart
250c8794-2190-4b3e-83c6-7c6f40698d72
Qin, Weiping, Cho, Sungjun and Hyde, Stuart
(2022)
Measuring market integration during crisis periods.
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 78, [101555].
(doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101555).
Abstract
Pukthuanthong and Roll (2009) measure the degree of market integration by the percentage of a market’s returns explained by global risk factors. However, during periods of crisis characterised by high volatility, their measure may be biased. This paper investigates the determinants of the explanatory power in a multi-factor model during global crises. We show that the explanatory power is influenced by factor heteroscedasticity, changes in factor loadings and residual heteroscedasticity. Using a counterfactual analysis, we establish an empirical framework to examine the effects of each element on integration for 53 financial markets during six recent crisis periods. We find the unconditional market integration is much lower for most markets during a period of crisis than implied. Both factor heteroscedasticity and the existence of contagion during crises account for this difference.
Text
Qin, et al._2022_Market Integration_JIFMIM
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 21 March 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 March 2022
Published date: 1 May 2022
Keywords:
Contagion, Factor heteroscedasticity, Financial crisis, Market integration
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 472593
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/472593
ISSN: 1042-4431
PURE UUID: 22731f66-5b6c-4d95-80de-efb7a51eb98b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Dec 2022 17:38
Last modified: 20 Jul 2024 04:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Weiping Qin
Author:
Sungjun Cho
Author:
Stuart Hyde
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics