The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A critical analysis of a tripartite clinical decision involving a student, midwife and client

A critical analysis of a tripartite clinical decision involving a student, midwife and client
A critical analysis of a tripartite clinical decision involving a student, midwife and client
Clinical decision-making is integral to contemporary healthcare. Midwives support and advocate for primarily healthy women throughout a life-altering transition, as set out in the code. They provide safe, evidence-based, compassionate and individualised care in partnership with women, to promote choice and shared decision-making. This critical reflection analyses a tripartite clinical decision, focusing on the hypothetico-deductive and dual processing models. This is an opportune time to reflect upon one's own practice, particularly in light of the Ockenden report, to ensure high professional standards are maintained collaboratively across all parties involved in a clinical decision.
0969-4900
706-712
Hatherley, Katie
c5554f81-301f-47a0-ab89-1db277ff1177
Kitson-reynolds, Ellen
28b0a1aa-6f3c-4fed-bf0a-456fe5f5ca73
Hatherley, Katie
c5554f81-301f-47a0-ab89-1db277ff1177
Kitson-reynolds, Ellen
28b0a1aa-6f3c-4fed-bf0a-456fe5f5ca73

Hatherley, Katie and Kitson-reynolds, Ellen (2022) A critical analysis of a tripartite clinical decision involving a student, midwife and client. British Journal of Midwifery, 30 (12), 706-712. (doi:10.12968/bjom.2022.30.12.706).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Clinical decision-making is integral to contemporary healthcare. Midwives support and advocate for primarily healthy women throughout a life-altering transition, as set out in the code. They provide safe, evidence-based, compassionate and individualised care in partnership with women, to promote choice and shared decision-making. This critical reflection analyses a tripartite clinical decision, focusing on the hypothetico-deductive and dual processing models. This is an opportune time to reflect upon one's own practice, particularly in light of the Ockenden report, to ensure high professional standards are maintained collaboratively across all parties involved in a clinical decision.

Text
Hatherley and Kitson-Reynolds 2022 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (40kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 November 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 December 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473598
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473598
ISSN: 0969-4900
PURE UUID: 22854ae2-087a-4624-9852-eaa5f9daad1e
ORCID for Ellen Kitson-reynolds: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jan 2023 17:45
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Katie Hatherley

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×